Caesar's Messiah: The Roman Conspiracy to Invent Jesus Page #4

And it's at this time, I think,

the Gospels were written.

Because the theological structure

in the Gospels of a God, the father,

and the Son of God, is the same one

that Titus would have been presenting

to the Roman Senate.

Well, the Roman Senate

did accept Titus' evidence

and Vespasian was

deified and became a god.

Titus, therefore, became a Son of God.

The Arch of Titus, that still

stands in modern Rome today,

(?) is inscribed ??? dedication to the divine Titus,

son of the divine

Vespasian or son of a god.

This Imperial Cult set up

to worship Caesar as God,

also provided the basis for the

structure of the Roman Catholic Church.

Now, the rituals, paraphernalia

and symbols of paganism

would transfer wholesale

to the Christian Church.

The most obvious and clear

example is where the title

of the pagan chief priest of Rome,

the Pontifex Maximus,

became the title of the

Pope, the Christian Pope.

If you look at who held the

original bishop positions

in the Catholic Church

in those early times,

you would see that they are members

of the same pagan aristocracy.

They simply changed their

clothing a little bit,

they wore the same garments, but they

wore slightly different hairdresses.

They had become from being

a priest of a pagan cult

to being a priest of Rome.

Where the Vatican now stands,

there was once a pagan temple

which celebrated the mysteries of

a dying and ressurecting God-man

who wasn't Jesus.

There are many churches in

Rome, I've been to a few where

you go above into the

church, and there is Jesus;

and you go underneath, and there

is a little sanctuary of Mithras.

And it's basically the same figure.

PAGAN GOD MITHRAS

So, the Roman plot to invent

Christianity is just so clever,

when you think about it.

Through the Pope, who is

God's representative on Earth,

they no longer needed

expensive standing armies,

wars and punishment of

disobedient peasants.

They could, through

religion, rule their subjects.

Over time, Roman Christianity

propagated throughout the Empire

by way of the mass media of the day:

the Roman roads.

The Romans must have approved

of this new religion because,

as some scholar says, if the Gospels

really were Jewish literature

about a Roman sentenced criminal,

why wouldn't they have been destroyed?

One of the really surprising things

for me was to realize the extents

of Roman control of

propaganda and of literature.

So that, when you suddenly get all

of these Christians literature arising

in this period, one has to

ask:
how did that happen?

The conclusion that one has to reach

is that that could not have happened

without some degree of complicity

on the part of the Romans.

So, one is led to the conclusion

that the Romans must be involved

in the production of this literature.

RULING FAMILIES:
a CONSPIRACY

To produce and disseminate this

literature was a huge undertaking

and the Flavians

undoubtedly had colaborators.

We know they were funded

by the wealthiest family

in the world at this time: the

Alexanders, a Jewish family,

who served as Roman

tax collectors in Egypt.

Like the Herods in Judea, the

Alexanders had strong motivation

to keep the Jewish messianic

movement from threatening

their position and their wealth.

One of their family members

was Philo of Alexandria,

a famous Jewish teologian,

who was already writing works

that combined Jewish beliefs

with the modern Greek and

Roman pagan beliefs of the day.

Many scholars agree that his

writings formed the basis

from much of the

philosophy of Christianity.

In these pages is practically

every concept that you can find

(?) within Christianity. ???

combined to Greek philosophy and he took that

and he combined it with Judaism.

On top of that, he was from

a extremely wealthy family.

And this is important because

you have to follow the money

(?) when you're looking at major trends,

you've ??? paradigm is being set.

If you look at his family, then you

start seeing... well, this is interesting

because now we're starting to

come across the Flavians again.

His relatives were very

involved with the Flavians.

That whole area is where we're

going to look very closely

for the Christians origins.

It's from exactly this same circle

of people that you get the first signs

of Christian ideology and they all

lead to the rise of the Flavian dynasty.

Another wealthy influential

character, Princess Berenice,

was from the Herod family in Judea.

She's the grandaughter

of Herod, the Great,

a product of the Herod's intermarriage

with the conquered Jewish

ruling messianic lineage.

Princess Berenice appears

in the New Testament,

which makes her an

interesting character.

She had two or three husbands and

then became the mistress of Titus.

(?) So, you can see ??? rather like

dynasty here, you know, powerful people,

mixed marriages, you know,

shacking up with the conqueror.

Yea, and it's really where

Joe Atwill takes his idea

of a conspiracy to

write the New Testament.

But, let him say in his own words.

Berenice was a Herod related by marriage

to the Alexanders and, of course,

later she became the mistress to Titus.

The fact that she was so closely

linked with the Flavians, shows you that

the three families were very

unified in financial, romantic

and likely theological issues.

By the looks of things, this coalescence

seemed to have acquired about a dynamic

that led to the synthesis

of Judaism and paganism

and eventually became Christianity.

So, this is a very key time period.

I believe that the Gospels were

actually written under the control

of the Herods,

the Alexanders and the Flavians.

These families had the

motivation to create Christianity

and with the expertise in

Judaism that the Alexanders

and the Herods had, they had the

actual tecnical ability to come up with

(?) these stories that are a

fulfillment of a ??? prophecies.

So, it seems the Flavians

had the motivation, the means

and the colaborations through

which they likely constructed

PART TWO:
THE DOCUMENTS

and began disseminating Christianity.

PART TWO:
THE DOCUMENTS

And if our scholars are correct,

one of the documents they left behind

are the Gospels themselves.

THE AUTHORS OF THE GOSPELS

I began working on the study

of the Gospels in the 1970's

and I looked at texts in terms

of how were these composed,

JOHN HUDSON:

what is understanding their structure

tell you about who wrote them

Literary Analist and Author

"Goodbye Jesus"

and why they were written.

These texts were not

independent Jewish texts,

but they were created as literary

works using classical literary models.

If we expect that this is

the testimony of witnesses,

we've got a major problem.

We actually have four

anonymus documents.

MARK, MATHEW, LUKE AND JOHN

They were not written by the named

people on those documents.

This is simply church tradition

that the Gospels are so named:

according to Mark; according to Mathew.

Rate this script:0.0 / 0 votes