Caesar's Messiah: The Roman Conspiracy to Invent Jesus Page #9

the military campaign of Titus Flavius,

through parallel names,

locations and concepts.

Once I understood the system

that the Flavians were using

to link Jesus and Titus,

I was able to discover dozens

of these parallels

between Jesus and Titus.

And, what was amazing,

is that they occur in the same sequence.

And this simply proves

that this was deliberate,

that these unusual parallels had been

created by the Flavians as a signature.

It is their way to telling posterity

that they authored the Gospels.

These parallels are the Flavian

signature of the Gospels.

THE FLAVIAN SIGNATURE

Both Jesus and Titus began their

campaigns at the Sea of Galilee.

And then go into the

Galilean countryside,

followed by a journey to Jerusalem.

Once they reached the city's outskirts,

they pause for a period

before they enter.

Finally, they leave the city where

their campaigns come to an end.

To catalog the many parallels,

I gave each one a convenient name that

related to the concept in

that particular parallel set.

Starting at Galilee,

each of these are episodes that occurred

both in the Gospels story of Jesus

and in the history of Titus'

military campaign.

Cast out the supporters of the Son of Man

John possessed by a demon

The legion of demons

Demons infect another group

The herd ran violently

The herd drowned

Identification of the son of the living god

Binding and loosening

Both Jesus and Titus

journey to Jerusalem,

each sending messengers ahead to

meet him when he gets to the city.

On to Jerusalem - the messengers are sent ahead

Don't bury your dead or look back

The good Samaritan

When the Romans get to Jerusalem,

they noticed that the Jewish factions

are fighting against themselves.

At this point in the Gospels,

Jesus talks about "a house divided

against itself cannot stand".

Divide the group 3 for 2

Then Josephus wrote that,

in preparation for battle,

Titus ordered all of the fruit trees,

between the Roman camp

and the walls of Jerusalem, cut down.

At this point in the Gospels,

Jesus states that if a fruit tree

does not bear good fruit, cut it down.

Cut down the fruit tree

The narrow gate and the shut door

How to build a tower

Titus goes around the walls of

Jerusalem looking for the best place

to construct a tower, from which

they can watch their attack.

At this point in the Gospels,

Jesus asked which one of you who is going

to build a tower, doesn't first

sit and think about the cost.

Send a delegation

Inside the city:

At this point in the history,

Titus sends Josephus to ask the Jews

what terms they will accept for peace.

In the Gospels,

Jesus describes a king who sends a

delegation to ask for terms of peace.

The triumphal entrance and the stones that cried out

Both Jesus and Titus, at this point,

have triumphant entrances in Jerusalem.

During which, amazingly,

stones are said to cry out.

JOSEPHUS GOSPELS

And the stone came from it, and If every voice were still, the stones

cried out aloud... THE SON COMETH would immediately cry out

Each then drives a den of thieves out

from the area in front of the temple.

This is followed by Titus

encircling Jerusalem with a wall

and Jesus predicting that Jerusalem

will be encircled with a wall.

Because of wall,

starvation sets in Jerusalem.

Josephus wrote that a woman named Mary,

who called her son a myth for the world,

(?) slained him, ate him, thereby turning

him to a human Passover lamb.

In the Gospels,

we now have the Last Supper.

Jesus tells his disciples: "Take, eat,

this is my body, this is my blood. "

Thereby,

turning him into a Passover lamb.

Here, then, is the Flavian signature

of their authorship of the Gospels.

(?) You can see the fingerprints, ???

where they left their fingerprints

(?) all over these texts. You can start ???

to decode these texts

and start to arrive to really

startling conclusions about

how early Christianity first arose.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our scholars have shown that

the Gospels were not a product

of primitive Jewish fishermen. Rather,

they are a sophisticated literary work

combining religious ideas of the day

with Roman political

perspective and power.

Joseph Atwill's research reveals that

reading the works of Josephus,

concurrently with the New Testament,

shows that the events of Jesus'

life were not historical,

but, rather,

all of them are dependant on the events

in the military campaign

of Titus Flavius.

Jesus Christ was an allegory

for the Roman Caesar Titus.

The messiah of the Roman Empire.

The Roman son of a god that

Christianity was set up to worship.

I certainly don't wanna undermine the

positive things seen in Christianity.

I'm happy to admit that there are

positive things in Christianity

and the other religions as well.

What's at issue here,

are the historical claims

of these religions.

Traditionally,

religious dogma has forbidden

the examination of

historical discoveries.

Or the inclusion of certain scientific

findings in their teachings,

asking their followers, instead,

to blindly believe as they say,

not as the objective facts may show.

We live in a time, perhaps,

a new intellectual Rennaisance,

which is getting fed up with many

of the structures that we live with

and which is recognizing major frauds

at the heart of our financial markets

(?) and the heart of ??? our industry

and the plug is being pulled on them.

And my view is that we have yet

another fraud, the biggest of them all,

and it's a fraud at the

heart of Christianity.

And it's a time for

whistleblowers to come out

and to make this information available,

not just to scholars

in academic journals,

but to have it widely available

to anybody who wants to know.

It's helpful to hear a

wide diversity of voices,

in order for people to arrive

at their own conclusions.

And the theories brought

forth by our scholars

are a part of that diversity.

When they hear that the

Jesus story is a myth,

people feel that you're taking

something away, but you really not.

You push people and you go "why do you

believe in the historical Jesus?",

often people will go "well, you know,

the Bible..." and something.

But when you go "have you studied

it as an historical document,

have you looked at the evidence?",

they'll go "no, I haven't. "

So, that's not the real reason.

The real reason, when you push people is

"well, I have a relationship with Jesus. "

"I have a personnal relationship with Jesus

and that's what I don't wanna loose. "

And that's a really good

reason to be a Gnostic

and a really bad reason

to be a literalist.

The Gnostics, as well as

pre-Christian pagan mystery schools,

believed that the myth of the

dying and ressurecting god-man

was an allegory,

to be used for personnal growth,

to die to their lower nature and

arise to their higher nature.

The literalists took control

of the original myth

and shaped it so it would take the

power away from the individual

Rate this script:0.0 / 0 votes