The Pervert's Guide to Ideology

---

I'm giving you a choice:

either put on these glasses

or start eating that trashcan.

I already am eating from

the trashcan all the time.

The name of this trashcan

is ideology.

The material force

of ideology

makes me not see

what I'm effectively eating.

It's not only our reality

which enslaves us.

The tragedy of

our predicament

when we are within

ideology, is that

when we think that we

escape it into our dreams -

at that point we

are within ideology.

They Live from 1988

is definitely one of the

forgotten masterpieces

of the Hollywood left.

It tells the story of

John Nada.

'Nada' of course is Spanish

means 'nothing'.

A pure subject, deprived

of all substantial content.

A homeless worker in L.A.

who, drifting around

one day enters into

an abandoned church

and finds there a strange

box full of sunglasses.

And when he put one of them on,

walking along the L.A. streets

he discovers

something weird:

that these glasses function like

critique-of-ideology glasses.

They allow you to see

the real message beneath:

all the propaganda, publicity

glitz, posters and so on.

You see a large publicity

board telling you

have your holiday

of a lifetime

and when you

put the glasses on

you just see just on the white

background a gray inscription.

We live, so we are told,

in a post-ideological society.

We are interpolated,

that is to say

addressed by

social authority

not as subjects who should

do their duty, sacrifice themselves

but subjects of pleasures.

Realise your true potential.

Be yourself.

Lead a satisfying life.

When you put the

glasses on

you see dictatorship

in democracy.

It's the invisible order which

sustains your apparent freedom.

The explanation for the existence

of these strange ideology glasses

is the standard story of the

Invasion of the Body Snatchers.

Humanity is already under

the control of aliens.

Hey buddy!

You gonna pay for that or what?

Look buddy, I don't want

no hassle today.

Either pay for it

or put it back.

According to our common sense

we think that ideology is

something blurring, confusing

our straight view.

Ideology should be glasses

which distort our view,

and the critique of ideology

should be the opposite -

like, you take off the glasses

so that you can finally see

the way things really are.

This precisely, and here

the pessimism of

the film, of They Live

is well justified, this precisely

is the ultimate illusion:

ideology is not simply

imposed on ourselves.

Ideology is our spontaneous

relationship to our social world -

how we perceive each meaning

and so on and so on.

We in a way

enjoy our ideology.

All right.

To step out of ideology -

it hurts.

It's a painful experience.

You must force yourself to do it.

This is rendered in a

wonderful way with

a further scene in the film

where John Nada tries to force

his best friend, John Armitage

to also put the glasses on.

- I don't want to fight you.

- Come on!

- I don't want to fight you.

- Come on!

- Stop it!

- No!

And it's the weirdest

scene in the film.

The fight takes eight,

nine minutes.

Put on the glasses!

It may appear irrational

because why does this guy

reject so violently to

put the glasses on?

It is as if he is well aware

that spontaneously he lives

in a lie. That the glasses

will make him see the truth,

but that this truth

can be painful.

Can shatter many

of your illusions.

This is a paradox

we have to accept.

Put the glasses on!

Put 'em on!

The extreme violence

of liberation.

You must be forced

to be free.

If you trust simply your

spontaneous sense of

well-being or whatever -

you will never get free.

Look!

Freedom hurts.

The basic insight

of psychoanalysis

is to distinguish between

enjoyment and simple pleasures.

They are not the same.

Enjoyment is precisely enjoyment

in disturbed pleasure -

even enjoyment in pain.

And this excessive factor

disturbs the apparently simple

relationship between

duty and pleasures.

This is also a space

where ideology up to

and especially religious

ideology, operates.

This brings me to maybe

my favourite example -

the great classical Hollywood film

The Sound of Music.

We all know it's the story

of a nun who is too alive -

with too much energy -

ultimately sexual energy,

to be constrained

to the role of a nun.

Oh, Reverend Mother.

I'm so sorry. I just couldn't

help myself. The gates

were open and

the hills were beckoning

and before I...

Maria, I haven't summoned

you here for apologies.

Oh, please mother do let me

ask for forgiveness.

One, two three.

One, two, three.

One, two, three.

Step together. Now...

So, Mother Superior sends her

to the Von Trapp family

where she takes care

of the children...

Under.

- Kurt, we'll have to practice...

- Do allow me, will you?

...and at the same time,

of course, falls in love

with the baron Von Trapp.

And Maria gets too

disturbed by it -

cannot control it,

returns to the convent...

Oh there were times when

we would look at each other...

Oh, Mother,

I could hardly breathe.

Did you let him

see how you felt?

If I did, I didn't know it.

That's what's been

torturing me, I was there

on God's errand.

No wonder that in old

communist Yugoslavia

where I saw this film

for the first time,

exactly this scene,

or more precisely

the song which follows this

strange hedonist, if you want,

advice from the mother superior:

"Go back, seduce the guy,

follow this path,

"do not betray your desire... "

Namely the song which begins

with "Climb every mountain";

the song which is an

almost embarrassing display

and affirmation of desire.

This three minutes were censored.

Climb every mountain

Search high and low

Follow every by-way

Every path you know...

I think the censor was

a very intelligent man.

He knew, as probably

an atheist communist,

where the power of attraction

of catholic religion resides.

'Till you find your dream

If you read intelligent

catholic propagandists

and if you really try to discern,

what deal are they offering you?

It's not to prohibit,

in this case sexual pleasures.

It's a much more cynical

contract, as it were,

between the church as

an institution and the believer

troubled with, in this case,

sexual desires.

It is this hidden obscene

permission that you get -

you are covered by

the divine 'Big Other' -

you can do

what ever you want.

Enjoy.

A dream that will need...

This obscene contract

does not belong

to Christianity as such.

It belongs to catholic church

as an institution.

It is the logic of institution

at its purest.

Climb every mountain...

This is again a key

to the functioning of ideology.

Not only the explicit message:

renounce, suffer and so on,

but the true hidden message -

pretend to renounce and

you can get it all.

My psychoanalytic friends are

telling me that typically today

patients who come to the analyst

to resolve their problems

feel guilty, not because of

Rate this script:0.0 / 0 votes