Tim's Vermeer Page #2
Some way you could do that
in the 17th century.
I remember just having this vague idea
of comparing two colours with a mirror,
and it didn't go any farther than that
for a long time.
Sitting in the bathtub,
you know, that's I guess where you have
your eureka moments,
but, I don't know,
there's something about bath water...
It's just very, very relaxing.
And I was just picturing that mirror
hanging there in space,
and I pictured what I would see,
and there it was.
And so I grabbed a piece of paper,
being careful not to get it wet,
made a sketch, and that
was where I realised
Vermeer could have used a mirror
To test this I propped up a high school
photograph of my father-in-law on the table.
I put a piece of Masonite down here
to paint on.
I set a small mirror at a 45-degree angle.
And for the first time in my life,
I did just what Vermeer may have done.
I picked up some oil paints and a brush.
In Vermeer's camera
this would be a projection,
a lens is projecting this image.
But to show the actual
mirror painting process,
we're using a photograph here.
You can see that there's a reflection,
and then there's my canvas down here.
And right at the edge of the mirror,
I can see both things at once.
and either darken or lighten the paint
until it's the same exact colour.
And at that point,
when it's exactly the same colour,
the edge of the mirror will disappear.
All right, and I'm an idiot at this,
I have done this process
exactly twice in my life before.
What I'm doing is
I'm moving my head up and down
so that I can see first the original
and then my canvas.
I'm looking at both
things at the same time.
Right on the forehead,
you can see that they match,
because you can't really see
the edge of the mirror.
That's, that's your clue that
you've matched the paint exactly.
It's not subjective, it's objective.
I'm a piece of human photographic film
at that point.
What you're doing here
is you're essentially blending?
Yep, I am either darkening or lightening
the paint that's already on the surface.
You aren't tracing any lines,
'cause there are no lines.
Yeah, that's a characteristic of the
Vermeers that makes them unusual,
is that there weren't lines,
and there weren't any lines
drawn underneath the paint either.
It looks like there's these blobs
that are emerging into a picture.
It doesn't look like...
The order you're doing stuff in is not a...
It's not being done mentally.
No, it's...
And that's what's so nutty about it.
You know, if I was better at this,
it may be more systematic,
more systematically, but...
No matter what I've tried,
comparing the mirror to the canvas
and stirring the paint around,
it ends up looking like a photograph.
And this was the result
of Tim's experiment,
it took him five hours.
Not bad for a first oil painting.
The father-in-law picture was proof enough
in my mind that Vermeer probably did this.
However, my father-in-law doesn't look like
a 17th-century Dutch woman,
so I don't think it would be very
convincing evidence for a lot of people.
So, I thought the best way would be
to really do a Vermeer.
I had the suspicion that it was exactly
the same thing.
If I could do the father-in-law,
It seemed to me the most powerful
demonstration of the idea.
The reason I chose The Music Lesson
is probably because, of all the paintings,
because it's so complete
and so self-contained.
You know where the windows are,
you know how big the windows are,
you can reconstruct the harpsichord
independent of the painting,
the Spanish chair, the viola da gamba, the
rug, all these things could be procured,
and their appearance is gonna be what it
is, independent of Vermeer's painting.
It's a little scientific experiment
waiting to happen.
Before Tim went to all that trouble,
his idea by a working artist.
So we called up our friend,
Los Angeles-based painter
and entertainer, Martin Mull,
and asked him to meet Tim
at a studio in Las Vegas and see his gizmo.
Oh, my God.
Holy cow.
Took me about half an hour
to learn how to operate a paintbrush.
Good for you, it took me 40 years.
Well, and the beauty of this technique
is that you can make mistakes
and see what you did wrong instantly
and try to fix it.
This is astounding.
So this is a camera obscura,
typical of the type
that could be found in the 1600's.
This type of camera obscura
is called a "box camera obscura".
It generally had a ground glass like this.
It has the ability to refocus
by moving the lens in and out.
The general consensus of people
that believe Vermeer used optics
was that he may have looked at that image
and been inspired by it.
Yeah.
And that's the end of the story.
So now that we know there's a way
to copy the colours exactly,
I'm proposing an alternate history
of Vermeer.
Okay.
His father's an art dealer,
he wants to make a painting.
He looks at this image...
Okay.
There's my daughter, Natalie.
What if Vermeer took the camera,
turned it sideways, and now it's vertical,
- like my father-in-law picture.
- Okay.
He takes his canvas,
and, the secret ingredient,
the mirror.
Which corrects the inversion?
- Yeah, it brings it back...
- And everything...
And there it is! Clear as can be.
So if he's in his living room,
he puts up some curtains,
controls the light,
and now picks up his brush
and starts to paint.
My guess is that the Girl with the Red Hat
is that first painting.
- Wow.
- It's painted over the top of another painting.
We can x-ray it and see that
there's something else underneath,
so maybe this was just
a throwaway experiment.
So I understand, Tim,
that when you go back to Texas,
you're going to construct a replica
of the exact room where Vermeer painted?
Yeah.
And you're going
to do a painting in his stead,
am I right?
Yep.
Many of Vermeer's paintings appear
to have been painted in the same room,
likely the north-facing room
on the second floor
of the house Vermeer lived in.
That's the room Tim plans to construct.
I really hope to see firsthand
what Vermeer was up against,
if he was using this technique.
And try to get some idea
of how long it would take,
just to get the conditions right...
Just mundane things like how much
usable lighting do you get in a day.
So you're not going to use
any artificial light.
That's right.
And I'm only going to use materials
Okay.
into the constraint
of having to grind the pigments
and, you know, make the paint,
and use only pigments that he had access to
or that he used in his paintings.
For his experiment, Tim wanted
Translation
Translate and read this script in other languages:
Select another language:
- - Select -
- 简体中文 (Chinese - Simplified)
- 繁體中文 (Chinese - Traditional)
- Español (Spanish)
- Esperanto (Esperanto)
- 日本語 (Japanese)
- Português (Portuguese)
- Deutsch (German)
- العربية (Arabic)
- Français (French)
- Русский (Russian)
- ಕನ್ನಡ (Kannada)
- 한국어 (Korean)
- עברית (Hebrew)
- Gaeilge (Irish)
- Українська (Ukrainian)
- اردو (Urdu)
- Magyar (Hungarian)
- मानक हिन्दी (Hindi)
- Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Italiano (Italian)
- தமிழ் (Tamil)
- Türkçe (Turkish)
- తెలుగు (Telugu)
- ภาษาไทย (Thai)
- Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
- Čeština (Czech)
- Polski (Polish)
- Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Românește (Romanian)
- Nederlands (Dutch)
- Ελληνικά (Greek)
- Latinum (Latin)
- Svenska (Swedish)
- Dansk (Danish)
- Suomi (Finnish)
- فارسی (Persian)
- ייִדיש (Yiddish)
- հայերեն (Armenian)
- Norsk (Norwegian)
- English (English)
Citation
Use the citation below to add this screenplay to your bibliography:
Style:MLAChicagoAPA
"Tim's Vermeer" Scripts.com. STANDS4 LLC, 2024. Web. 18 Nov. 2024. <https://www.scripts.com/script/tim's_vermeer_21918>.
Discuss this script with the community:
Report Comment
We're doing our best to make sure our content is useful, accurate and safe.
If by any chance you spot an inappropriate comment while navigating through our website please use this form to let us know, and we'll take care of it shortly.
Attachment
You need to be logged in to favorite.
Log In