50 Years of Star Trek Page #11
- Year:
- 2016
- 84 min
- 404 Views
- Oh...
- 'Cause they're really one guy.
- I was like, "What did I miss?"
- [laughter]
- Mcskirk?
- I didn't see that episode.
It's a transporter malfunction.
You take that... those three...
Those three, it's like one guy
split up three ways.
You know, ordinarily,
if you have one person,
if you want to know what's
going on in their head,
you gotta have a
voice-over or something.
But with those three
guys, split up that way,
they could have a conversation...
- Yeah.
- And it's really like one guy.
I gotta go with Kirk.
- You gotta go with Kirk.
- I mean, the original series.
You just... the way he
just kinda, you know,
- sauntered around.
- Yes.
You gotta love him.
The Shat was the guy I grew up on.
I admire Picard.
I love them all equally, but...
uh... I think there is no substitute
for Bill Shatner.
Shatner's putting
on such a great persona
of a trustworthy captain
with just enough sense of humor.
You know? And calm under pressure.
And good with the ladies.
Shatner had it all.
The way he presented that character
was just so awesome
and believable and
theatrical at the same time.
He's not a subtle guy.
But I just thought it was great.
He fought... I think it was, like,
a Gorgan or
whatever. It's where he had...
Captain Kirk is stranded in the desert
and he's got, like, this lizard creature
he's gotta fight and he's gotta learn
how to make, like, gunpowder
and projectiles and stuff like that.
Certainly the iconic, classic scene
in which Spock... or Kirk
confronts "God" and says,
"What does God need with a starship?"
the history of cinema
would come up to God? Not
even Charlton Heston
would say to God, "What do
you need with a starship?"
Absolutely, without question,
my favorite captain is James T. Kirk.
I mean, he just... Kirk
did the right thing.
He said the right
thing. People looked up to him.
He was a man of action.
He was a man of romance.
And, like, I mean, as
performed by William Shatner?
I mean, there was a
reason why as a little kid
There's a reason why as an
almost 50-year-old grown-up
that I still watch the original series
and I still wanna be James T. Kirk.
He is the best captain.
100-foot tall Apollo, and with great...
sort of indignation.
"What gives you the right..." you know,
- to a 100-foot tall god...
- [laughter]
He shouted, "What gives you the right?"
- When Apollo just could have...
- [laughter]
Done that.
Yeah, the sort of
leadership and the fearlessness
and also... my first understanding
of what a...
- you lead by example.
- Yeah.
The captain's setting,
the fish stinks from the head down,
all of those leadership qualities
that hadn't been shown
to me by a family member
or by anyone at school, a teacher.
Really, it oddly was that
leadership necessary
as put forth by Captain
James Tiberius Kirk.
I mean, I love Captain Kirk. However...
I have...[stammers]
you know, I have to say
that I think my favorite
captain is Picard...
- Uh-huh.
Kirk is really only 1/3rd of a guy.
- Oh...
- He's only 1/3rd of a guy!
- Interesting.
- Picard is a nice,
well-rounded guy.
And he doesn't have to punch
anybody in the face
to get his point across, right?
- But if he has to, he can.
- Well, he can,
but he usually has Riker do it or Worf.
Yeah, he, uh...
You know, for me, in a lot of ways,
"Next Generation" was a...
- "Star Trek" kind of grown up.
- Yeah.
You know? And
that started with Picard.
Yeah. My answer's actually Picard too.
Just because I find him to be...
I don't think he's the
most realistic of a captain.
I think that Picard has so few flaws,
and he only really finally becomes human
after he's a Borg and
then turned into a human.
You know, he really just starts like...
They give him a love
story once in a while...
But it just... I don't know.
I just love... I found
Picard to be virtuous
and I found Picard to be like, oh...
day turn into that guy,
maybe "Star Trek's" plausible.
But it's not gonna happen.
Yeah, he's a great representation
0 of kind of Rodenberry's vision.
- Yeah, a vision of what
- humanity can be.
- What a captain is.
- Exactly.
Yeah. Just putting every...
He just... I don't
know. I just always...
And that accent. I
mean, you can't really...
- Well, the accent, yeah.
- Top that voice.
Narrator:
Coming up, the 50-yearlegacy of "Star Trek"
and beyond.
The show is about what
it is to be human,
and that never goes out of style.
And it's the type of
stories that they tell
that you don't generally
get in other television shows.
- Yeah.
- The introspective...
And the basis of it is who are we...
who are we as human beings?
I think it's because
it's an optimistic view of the future.
- Hope.
- Yeah. It's hope.
- Yeah.
- I think that's exactly
what it is... it's an
optimistic portrayal
of what we could hopefully achieve
and what our society could be like
and that we finally accept each other
look past differences
and things like that.
And I think that we so desperately hope
that we can achieve that.
And it evolves, you
know, from series to series,
over the 50 years.
It may have some core values and ideas
and the optimism and the hope,
but it evolves with the times, too.
So it, you know, it... hopefully
the next reiteration
will fit our times
today much like, you know,
"The Next Gen" did in
the late '80s, early '90s
or "Deep Space Nine" and
"Voyager" in the '90s,
and, of course, the
original series back in the '60s.
But it's been able to evolve.
It hasn't been a static
kind of franchise.
That is what's great about it, for sure.
There's that Martin Luther King line...
"The arc of history bends
toward justice."
I think for fans of this show,
the arc of history bends
towards "Star Trek,"
that we have this hope, this belief,
that... things are getting better.
And that, yeah, we're
probably not gonna, you know,
run into guys with
pointed ears out there.
But we will find a way
to fix our problems
and move out into the universe
and believe in, you know, the...
you know, the better
angels of our nature
and... and make the world a better place.
Trek" that I've said before
is it was the Beatles of 1960s TV.
And if you had to describe the Beatles,
you would say it's magic.
And take any one of
them out of that band,
and it's not the Beatles.
Well, "Star Trek's" the same way
from the same period.
I mean, take William Shatner out.
Take Rodenberry or Coon or Fontana out
or Deforest Kelley, and
you don't have it.
but it's not gonna be what it is,
and we wouldn't have what
we have now 15 years later.
I think there's a lot of reasons
why it endures so long.
Translation
Translate and read this script in other languages:
Select another language:
- - Select -
- 简体中文 (Chinese - Simplified)
- 繁體中文 (Chinese - Traditional)
- Español (Spanish)
- Esperanto (Esperanto)
- 日本語 (Japanese)
- Português (Portuguese)
- Deutsch (German)
- العربية (Arabic)
- Français (French)
- Русский (Russian)
- ಕನ್ನಡ (Kannada)
- 한국어 (Korean)
- עברית (Hebrew)
- Gaeilge (Irish)
- Українська (Ukrainian)
- اردو (Urdu)
- Magyar (Hungarian)
- मानक हिन्दी (Hindi)
- Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Italiano (Italian)
- தமிழ் (Tamil)
- Türkçe (Turkish)
- తెలుగు (Telugu)
- ภาษาไทย (Thai)
- Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
- Čeština (Czech)
- Polski (Polish)
- Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Românește (Romanian)
- Nederlands (Dutch)
- Ελληνικά (Greek)
- Latinum (Latin)
- Svenska (Swedish)
- Dansk (Danish)
- Suomi (Finnish)
- فارسی (Persian)
- ייִדיש (Yiddish)
- հայերեն (Armenian)
- Norsk (Norwegian)
- English (English)
Citation
Use the citation below to add this screenplay to your bibliography:
Style:MLAChicagoAPA
"50 Years of Star Trek" Scripts.com. STANDS4 LLC, 2024. Web. 20 Nov. 2024. <https://www.scripts.com/script/50_years_of_star_trek_1751>.
Discuss this script with the community:
Report Comment
We're doing our best to make sure our content is useful, accurate and safe.
If by any chance you spot an inappropriate comment while navigating through our website please use this form to let us know, and we'll take care of it shortly.
Attachment
You need to be logged in to favorite.
Log In