50 Years of Star Trek Page #6
- Year:
- 2016
- 84 min
- 404 Views
- Nobody does that kind of stuff.
- Right.
On science fiction in particular.
And so I think that
show in terms of its depth,
in terms of the issues it would address,
I thought made it the best.
And, you know, arguably
there are some of the best episodes
of all 700-plus hours.
"The Next Generation"
had become such a success
in first-run syndication for the studio
that they wanted more, so
you had "Deep Space Nine,"
which was about a space station
and it was a little darker.
"Next Gen" was my
undergraduate studies
and "Deep Space Nine" was graduate.
"DS9" had such a different feel
while still being "Star Trek."
It took things even deeper.
We were attracted to
doing darker stories.
We were attracted to doing stories
that had much more conflict in them,
that were more morally ambiguous,
that were tackling difficult
subject matter
with our characters.
And we all felt that
we were pushing "Trek,"
but none of us felt
like we were breaking it.
That was the first time that you see
what television is now, which
is dark and foreboding.
And I really wanted to do the show.
Really wanted to do the show.
I-I was like...
I just... not only as an actor who
would get a steady paycheck,
but more importantly,
as a fan of the show
I wanted to be part of the
ethos that was "Star Trek."
It's really nice to see that
people could stick with the show
more demanding of its audience.
But no victory can make this
moment any easier for me.
And I promise I will not
rest until I stand with you again.
Somebody had the brilliant idea
of bringing Worf onto our show.
Unfortunately, I will be
away from the station at that time.
What they hoped
would happen did happen.
Thousands, if not millions, of people
watched because Worf was on the show.
And so our fan base got resurrected
because of Michael Dorn.
And I had my concerns about that
'cause I didn't want
Worf to be standing around,
just to be a, you
know, some guy that just...
They throw in there.
I really want him to
open up as a character.
Worf was, like, really the
only choice from that cast
that made any sense and
something to the puzzle.
Here's the war-like
character coming into a situation
that's a war-torn environment.
So that made a certain amount of sense.
What is that smell?
Is there a pile of
rotting forshak in here.
I loved my time on "Next Generation,"
but the work I did on "Deep
Space" was much better.
Over my tenure on "Deep Space,"
that was the mantra was,
"How far can we push this franchise?
Or what are the places we can go
that none of the other shows can go?
What can't they do in 'Star Trek, '
and is there a way we can do it?"
Every "Star Trek" show broke
grounds in some way, you know?
"Deep Space Nine," Sisko,
he was a black captain.
And then you have
Janeway in "Voyager," a woman.
I mean, they were always thinking ahead.
Narrator:
When"Voyager" launches in 1995,
"Star Trek" has been
pushing the envelope
for nearly 30 years.
The new series pushes further.
A lot of women of a certain age
who that show meant a
lot to because of Kate.
You know, they look at it, you know,
the same way that guys of my generation
look at Kirk as a role model,
they look at Kate's Janeway and say,
"You know, she proved that, you know,
"I could be thoughtful and
smart and commanding,
and not necessarily use my sexuality
to get what I want."
Then you leave me no choice.
As a writer, writing Captain Janeway,
I didn't think of her as a woman.
I thought of her as the captain.
she ended up being a role model
to a lot of people, men or women.
I was very happy and proud
of what the producers had
done with this cast in "Voyager."
First of all, starting
off with a female captain
'cause we had not seen that before.
My friend, Rene, got
cast in "Deep Space."
And he told me how cool
it was, and I envied him.
I said, "What a great
show to be on," you know.
And then a couple of years later,
boom, I was in "Voyager."
And I-I had no idea
what the character
was makeup-wise, you know?
But I flew out and
I-I went into the room,
and there was UPN, and
there was Paramount,
and there were the
creators of "Star Trek."
And, um, I read
and I guess I was exactly
what what they were looking for.
"Star Trek:
Voyager" is probablyAnd I was so
excited, and I was so nervous.
It was a two-part special and
I was playing a scientist.
What do you do here?
- We watch the skies.
- For what?
Signs of extraterrestrial life.
Nice meeting you.
I remembered going to my acting coach,
and he read through the script.
And I was looking to him for guidance.
And he just went, uh,
"You know, sometimes when
you're running from lasers,
you just... you just gotta
pretend you're running from lasers."
- Get down!
- [laser fire]
I was like, "Oh.' Ahem.
It gave me so much freedom.
I was like, "Oh, yeah, I
just... I pretend," you know?
You don't really draw from
your childhood or something.
You just pretend you're
running from lasers.
[laser fire]
What the hell?
What I wanted to do
was bring the Borg in.
It was my feeling that the Borg
could always be "Voyager's" Klingons.
They needed a recurring villain.
And for better or worse,
that's what we ended up doing.
And it's one of the
things that defined "Voyager"
was the introduction of
the Seven of Nine character.
You had a very sexy
woman in a very sexy outfit.
You know, it was supposed to lure in
a certain male demographic.
But, in reality, she
was the Spock character.
She was the Data character.
Report.
I've applied 10,053 algorithms
to the energy signatures
produced by chaotic space.
The Roddenberry influence
was always respected.
We didn't want to do something
totally, outrageously anti-Roddenberry.
It's almost like you
have to keep pinching yourself.
You show up on these sets and
you have to remind yourself,
"I'm in the middle of
something that when we do it right,
is really important, can
really affect people."
Now it's hard to do
I don't know who has
ever succeeded in that,
but I think that we
all could feel as a cast
when we were telling a good
story and doing it well.
There was a lot of
discussion what "Enterprise"
would look like and feel like.
Narrator:
"Star Trek: Enterprise"is a prequel to the entire franchise.
Set in the 22nd century,
as Starfleet's first
explorers venture into space.
You know, we were trying to, I think,
deconstruct "Star Trek"
and figure out, you know,
how it all came together.
You know, we'd certainly seen the future
of where it was all going.
And it was a real
challenge to kind of back that up
and imagine, you
know, what was this...
What was this like 150
Translation
Translate and read this script in other languages:
Select another language:
- - Select -
- 简体中文 (Chinese - Simplified)
- 繁體中文 (Chinese - Traditional)
- Español (Spanish)
- Esperanto (Esperanto)
- 日本語 (Japanese)
- Português (Portuguese)
- Deutsch (German)
- العربية (Arabic)
- Français (French)
- Русский (Russian)
- ಕನ್ನಡ (Kannada)
- 한국어 (Korean)
- עברית (Hebrew)
- Gaeilge (Irish)
- Українська (Ukrainian)
- اردو (Urdu)
- Magyar (Hungarian)
- मानक हिन्दी (Hindi)
- Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Italiano (Italian)
- தமிழ் (Tamil)
- Türkçe (Turkish)
- తెలుగు (Telugu)
- ภาษาไทย (Thai)
- Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
- Čeština (Czech)
- Polski (Polish)
- Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Românește (Romanian)
- Nederlands (Dutch)
- Ελληνικά (Greek)
- Latinum (Latin)
- Svenska (Swedish)
- Dansk (Danish)
- Suomi (Finnish)
- فارسی (Persian)
- ייִדיש (Yiddish)
- հայերեն (Armenian)
- Norsk (Norwegian)
- English (English)
Citation
Use the citation below to add this screenplay to your bibliography:
Style:MLAChicagoAPA
"50 Years of Star Trek" Scripts.com. STANDS4 LLC, 2024. Web. 19 Nov. 2024. <https://www.scripts.com/script/50_years_of_star_trek_1751>.
Discuss this script with the community:
Report Comment
We're doing our best to make sure our content is useful, accurate and safe.
If by any chance you spot an inappropriate comment while navigating through our website please use this form to let us know, and we'll take care of it shortly.
Attachment
You need to be logged in to favorite.
Log In