Beyond A Reasonable Doubt Page #6
previously entered
as People's Exhibit C.
This was taken from
the defendant's apartment.
Could that be the murder weapon?
Yes, the blade's length and width
are the same as the stab wound.
And when you examined this knife
did you find any traces of blood on it?
No, it had recently been cleaned
with a strong industrial-strength
cleaning solution.
And deformities on the handle indicate
that it had been boiled.
Plus striations on the blade indicate
the blade had
recently been reground.
I have no more questions.
Thank you, Dr. Romans.
- Your witness.
- So just to be clear,
what you're saying
is you don't know
if this is the actual
murder weapon or not.
No.
Thank you.
No further questions.
The dog bite on Mr. Nicholas's left calf
was consistent with a dog bite
from a dog of that size and breed.
Now you found a shoeprint at the scene.
What kind of shoe was that?
They belonged to a Montalvo sneaker.
Similar to the shoes
owned by the defendant
marked for evidence
as People's Exhibit D?
Yes.
Now is that a popular brand sneaker?
No, they're extremely rare.
In fact, there isn't a single store
in Shreveport that carries them.
And did you compare the defendant's
sneaker with the print at the scene?
Yes. They were a match
for both size and weight.
Now the mask,
the ski mask
that was found
at the defendant's apartment
marked as People's Exhibit E.
What can you tell me about this?
around the eyeholes
on the outside.
Someone had sprayed it.
It was consistent with the pepper
spray belonging to the victim.
Thank you.
I have no more questions, Your Honor.
Now you can't actually tell us
that the bite on my client's calf
- came from Mr. Tarlow's dog?
- No.
So it could have come from any dog
of similar size and breed,
- like the one owned by my client in fact?
- Yes, that's right.
that there was considerable blood
spatter caused by the attack.
- Is that correct?
- Yes.
And yet when you examined
the defendant's clothing,
entered into evidence
as People's Exhibit E,
you found no traces of blood at all.
No, but the client had time...
Just a yes or no will be sufficient.
So in fact, would it be fair to say
that there is no direct
forensic evidence whatsoever
connecting my client to this crime?
Yes.
No further questions.
So sorry.
Yeah?
You'll excuse me for one minute.
- Sorry, honey.
- It's okay.
This better be good.
So what the hell kind
of emergency is this?
- We checked Nicholas's financials again.
- Yeah.
He bought a video camera at Wright's
Audio two days after the murder.
There's a point to this, right?
jogging suit and a ski mask
He bought a dog
at the animal shelter.
All this within a day of buying
the video camera.
Something doesn't smell right.
So when he went on this shopping spree,
was he alone?
People at the sporting goods
store can't remember.
Salesclerk at Wright's Audio said he
might have been with someone.
The man at the animal shelter,
for sure
remembers he was with another man.
- Do you know who this man is?
- I'm pretty sure.
Well, if someone did a video,
then this man's got it.
We can't have that, can we?
Now would you please tell the court what
you found on the defendant's pants?
On request of the DA's office,
we retested the defendant's clothing.
And what did you find on it?
We found small traces of blood
on the seams of his sweatpants.
It happens.
You Honor, we were given no
prior notice of this testimony.
Judge, we only discovered
this evidence yesterday.
I'll allow it.
Don't worry, Counselor.
I'll give you time
to examine this evidence.
Did you do a DNA analysis
of the blood
that you found
on the defendant's pants?
- Yes I did.
- And what did that analysis show you?
The blood belonged to the victim.
I have no more questions,
Your Honor.
Excuse me.
Stop.
Oh sh*t.
Your Honor, the prosecution rests.
Are you ready to call
your first witness, Counselor?
Yes, Your Honor. The defense would
like to call Dr. Aaron Wakefield.
Go.
Stop stop.
Stop stop.
Stop!
Excuse me. Sorry.
Hi, I need to open
My name's Corey Finley.
Here's my ID.
Certainly, Mr. Findley.
Oh, it's actually Finley.
No D.
I cannot find your record.
Probably, yeah.
You know, I have a cousin
named Findley.
- You do?
- With a D.
Second cousin really.
Or is it first cousin once removed?
You see, she's married
to my first cousin.
Do you know how
No, I don't really...
you know, if we could possibly...
Here it is.
Corey Finley no D.
Do you have your key
with you, Mr. Finley no D?
Yes, I do. I have my key.
There it is.
- Oh, good.
- Okay.
Hey.
Okay.
It's right in here.
It's right here. It's right there.
Well, of course.
There it is.
Okay, here's my key.
Do you think that we
could speed this up?
- I'm in a bit of a rush.
- No.
Okay.
- Care for a private booth?
- No thank you.
Mr. Finley!
Oh!
Ow.
Excuse me.
Excuse me, stop.
Sorry.
And in your opinion, Dr. Wakefield,
caused by a knife other than the one
- belonging to the defendant?
- Absolutely.
Any blade of that
approximate length
caused those wounds.
There are hundreds
of knives with blades that size.
Call your next witness, Mr. Spota.
I can't keep stalling.
Where is this surprise witness
you keep telling me about?
He'll be here any second.
You've been saying that
for the past four hours.
- He should have been here by now.
- Counselor?
Uh, Your Honor,
we're expecting the appearance
of a rebuttal witness.
Well, do you know where he is?
Uh...
no, Your Honor.
Your Honor, the defense requests
a continuance at this time
so we can examine the prosecution's
new forensic evidence.
Motion granted.
We'll meet back here at 9:00 AM
Monday morning.
Court adjourned.
Counselor, is the defense
ready to continue?
We are, Your Honor.
The defense calls CJ Nicholas.
Raise your right hand.
Do you solemnly swear to tell the truth,
the whole truth and nothing but the truth,
- so help you God?
- I do.
Be seated.
- Did you murder Doris Ruth Owens?
- I did not.
So why are you on trial here today?
'Cause I wanted to be.
What do you mean?
I deliberately implicated
myself in the crime.
- Why would you do such a thing?
- I was working on a story
about the DA's office planting
forensic evidence
in murder trials
in order to obtain guilty verdicts.
Your Honor, that is
an outrageous statement.
I felt the only way that I could uncover
evidence of corruption in the DA's office
was to implicate myself
in the crime,
to see if the DA would fabricate DNA
evidence which he now has done.
Silence.
Did you know about this?
Translation
Translate and read this script in other languages:
Select another language:
- - Select -
- 简体中文 (Chinese - Simplified)
- 繁體中文 (Chinese - Traditional)
- Español (Spanish)
- Esperanto (Esperanto)
- 日本語 (Japanese)
- Português (Portuguese)
- Deutsch (German)
- العربية (Arabic)
- Français (French)
- Русский (Russian)
- ಕನ್ನಡ (Kannada)
- 한국어 (Korean)
- עברית (Hebrew)
- Gaeilge (Irish)
- Українська (Ukrainian)
- اردو (Urdu)
- Magyar (Hungarian)
- मानक हिन्दी (Hindi)
- Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Italiano (Italian)
- தமிழ் (Tamil)
- Türkçe (Turkish)
- తెలుగు (Telugu)
- ภาษาไทย (Thai)
- Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
- Čeština (Czech)
- Polski (Polish)
- Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Românește (Romanian)
- Nederlands (Dutch)
- Ελληνικά (Greek)
- Latinum (Latin)
- Svenska (Swedish)
- Dansk (Danish)
- Suomi (Finnish)
- فارسی (Persian)
- ייִדיש (Yiddish)
- հայերեն (Armenian)
- Norsk (Norwegian)
- English (English)
Citation
Use the citation below to add this screenplay to your bibliography:
Style:MLAChicagoAPA
"Beyond A Reasonable Doubt" Scripts.com. STANDS4 LLC, 2024. Web. 19 Nov. 2024. <https://www.scripts.com/script/beyond_a_reasonable_doubt_3989>.
Discuss this script with the community:
Report Comment
We're doing our best to make sure our content is useful, accurate and safe.
If by any chance you spot an inappropriate comment while navigating through our website please use this form to let us know, and we'll take care of it shortly.
Attachment
You need to be logged in to favorite.
Log In