Blackfish Page #8
that she asks him to do
where Tilikum justjumps right in
and he does exactly what she asks him to do.
There seemed to be a point in the session
where things went south, so to speak.
And in my humble opinion,
it was at that missed bridge--
whistle bridge,
on the perimeter pec wave.
She asked him to do a perimeter pec wave
where she asked him to basically
go all the way around the pool
and wave his pectoral flipper.
And she blows her whistle...
- There we go.
- ...which is a bridge,
which tells the animal that, okay,
you've done a good job.
Come back and get food.
But he missed that cue.
That's beyond waving.
And he went all the way around the pool
on this perimeter pec wave.
That's all right.
We're going to let him keep on waving.
My interpretation is that
he didn't hear the whistle.
So not only did he not hear the bridge,
then he went and did
a perfect behavior and came back,
and what he got was what we call
a three-second neutral response,
which is just a way to let the animal know,
"No, you didn't do the correct thing.
You're not going to get rewarded.
And then we're going to move on."
And then you can also see through the video
that Dawn is running out of food.
The animals can sense
when you're getting to the bottom
of your bucket of fish,
because they can hear the ice clanging around
and the kind of fishy, soupy water
at the bottom.
And the handfuls of fish that
they're getting delivered by the trainer
are all getting smaller.
So they know that they're coming down
to the end of session.
When you see the difference
between the beginning of the video
and the end of the video, you can see
that he's just not quite on his game anymore.
There was no food left.
She kept asking him for more and more behaviors.
He wasn't getting reinforced for the behaviors
that he was doing correctly.
He probably was frustrated towards the end.
Then she walked around the perimeter of G pool.
He followed her.
And then continued over
where she laid down with him
to do a relationship session,
which is--
it's quiet time, basically.
Tilikum at some point
grabbed ahold of her left forearm
and started to drag her
and eventually did a barrel roll
and pulled her in.
It may have started as play or frustration
very violent behavior
that I think was anything but play.
In the end, he basically
just completely mutilated that poor girl.
They were gathering
all of the trainers at the Texas park.
He said, "There's been an accident
at the Florida park
and a trainer was killed."
Hearing that it was Dawn,
I was-- I couldn't believe it.
I just remember saying to myself, "Not Dawn.
It can't be Dawn."
He said that--
"And he still has her."
And I just...
was so disturbed by that
and the reality of how powerless we are.
Avulsion, laceration, abrasion, fractures.
Fractures and associated hemorrhages.
Blunt force traumas
to the main body, to the extremities.
To see this meted out against a trainer...
and I cannot fathom the reason.
It's shocking.
what I thought we'd learned,
and I'm sitting in the courtroom
and I've got the Keltie Byrne
case file in one hand
and I've got Dawn Brancheau in the other.
And they're almost, to the day, 20 years apart.
And I'm looking at these two things.
My only answer is, "Nothing."
In fact, it's not a damn thing.
We have not learned a damn thing
for something like that
Could you tell
if it was an accident or if this--
Did this female trainer
work with this whale on a regular basis?
I don't know. What apparently happened
is we had a female trainer
back in the whale holding area.
She apparently slipped or fell into the tank
and was fatally injured by one of the whales.
At first, SeaWorld reported
that a trainer slipped
and fell in the water and was drowned.
So that was the first report.
It wasn't until eyewitness
accounts disputed that
that they had to go back in their huddle
and say, "Wait a minute.
We gotta come up with a new plan."
New tonight--
SeaWorld has confirmed
the woman into the water.
She didn't fall into the tank
as the sheriff's department initially reported.
The new plan is that he grabbed her ponytail.
This is a subtle way of placing
the blame on Dawn's shoulders.
She shouldn't have had a long ponytail,
or if she did have that ponytail,
it should have been up in a bun.
Dawn, if she was standing here
with me right now,
would tell you that it was her mistake
in allowing that to happen.
They blamed her.
How dare you?
How disrespectful for you to blame her
when she's not even alive to defend herself.
He grabbed her ponytail
and pulled her into the water.
That's as simple as it gets.
There are photographs
doing exactly the same thing that she was doing,
so I knew that SeaWorld was lying
about the fact that this was her fault.
The ponytail, in all likelihood, is just a tale.
The safety spotter, who apparently
didn't actually see the takedown,
came up with that.
- Are you excited?
- Yeah!
During the spotter's testimony,
OSHA pushed him to say
that he wasn't really sure
that it was her ponytail
that was in the whale's mouth,
that he just saw her underwater
and he assumed it was the ponytail.
OSHA contends that the whale came up
and grabbed Dawn Brancheau's arm,
saying that that was another level
of aggressiveness.
And again, SeaWorld is saying
it was not an aggressive move.
One of SeaWorld's top curators, Chuck Tompkins,
said when Dawn Brancheau
was pulled off that ledge,
it wasn't necessarily
aggressive behavior by the whale.
The initial grab was not an act of aggression.
This is not a crazed animal.
The industry has a vested interest
in spinning these
so that the animals continue to appear
that are completely safe.
You know, that sells a lot of Shamu dolls,
it sells a lot of tickets at the gate,
and that's the story line
that they're going to continue
to stick with for as long as they can.
Recognize that those that say
this is a crazed animal
that acted out and grabbed Dawn maliciously,
they want to prove the theorem
that captivity makes animals crazy.
And that is just false.
All whales in captivity have a bad life.
They're all emotionally destroyed.
They're all psychologically traumatized,
so they are ticking time bombs.
It's not just Tilikum.
We have to separate
what happened to Dawn--
and, as tragic as it is, no one wants
to ever see it happen again.
Can SeaWorld create an environment
Yes, I absolutely believe they can.
What if there were no SeaWorlds?
I can't imagine a society, with the value we put
on marine mammals, if those parks didn't exist.
I'm not at all interested in having my daughter,
Translation
Translate and read this script in other languages:
Select another language:
- - Select -
- 简体中文 (Chinese - Simplified)
- 繁體中文 (Chinese - Traditional)
- Español (Spanish)
- Esperanto (Esperanto)
- 日本語 (Japanese)
- Português (Portuguese)
- Deutsch (German)
- العربية (Arabic)
- Français (French)
- Русский (Russian)
- ಕನ್ನಡ (Kannada)
- 한국어 (Korean)
- עברית (Hebrew)
- Gaeilge (Irish)
- Українська (Ukrainian)
- اردو (Urdu)
- Magyar (Hungarian)
- मानक हिन्दी (Hindi)
- Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Italiano (Italian)
- தமிழ் (Tamil)
- Türkçe (Turkish)
- తెలుగు (Telugu)
- ภาษาไทย (Thai)
- Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
- Čeština (Czech)
- Polski (Polish)
- Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Românește (Romanian)
- Nederlands (Dutch)
- Ελληνικά (Greek)
- Latinum (Latin)
- Svenska (Swedish)
- Dansk (Danish)
- Suomi (Finnish)
- فارسی (Persian)
- ייִדיש (Yiddish)
- հայերեն (Armenian)
- Norsk (Norwegian)
- English (English)
Citation
Use the citation below to add this screenplay to your bibliography:
Style:MLAChicagoAPA
"Blackfish" Scripts.com. STANDS4 LLC, 2024. Web. 22 Nov. 2024. <https://www.scripts.com/script/blackfish_4221>.
Discuss this script with the community:
Report Comment
We're doing our best to make sure our content is useful, accurate and safe.
If by any chance you spot an inappropriate comment while navigating through our website please use this form to let us know, and we'll take care of it shortly.
Attachment
You need to be logged in to favorite.
Log In