![Find Burzynski on Amazon](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BMzU1NzQ0MTI4NF5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwNjQwNjMyNw@@._V1_SX300.jpg)
Burzynski Page #7
Well, Dr. Burzynski has won his latest round in court,
the Medical Examiners order was reversed,
but that is not expected to be the end of his trouble
with the state of Texas.
The Texas Medical Board took this imaginary
case all the way to the Texas State supreme court,
where the judge issued an erroneous probation order
against Burzynski, which Burzynski successfully served.
But, again, leaving the Texas Medical Board completely
unsuccessful in their efforts to remove his medical license.
So if efficacy was not an issue, and Dr. Burzynski wasn't
breaking any laws, then why would the Texas Medical Board
continue on with this empty pursuit?
Well, it was eventually realized - even by the mainstream press
- that the Food and Drug Administration
had been pressuring the Texas Medical Board to continue
tying to take away Dr. Burzynski's medical license.
For this story we wanted to talk to
the FDA about its policies and procedures.
The FDA did agree to talk to us on background
where it wouldn't be quoted,
but it repeatedly refused
our requests for on-camera interviews.
While they were busy pressuring the Texas State Medical Board
to try to revoke Dr. Burzynski's medical license,
they were even busier tying to revoke Dr. Burzynski
completely from society - by trying to place him in prison.
The FDA and PhRMA quickly realized that if Dr. Burzynski's
discovery would be given a fair review process,
not only would chemotherapy and radiation dwindle into obscurity,
financially crippling the industry,
but it would also mean that for the first time in history,
all of that income would funnel away from PhRMA and into the lap
of one single scientist who holds the exclusive patent rights.
Apparently, the FDA had not ruled out
the possibility of this happening one day.
On March 12th, 1976, FDA Bureau of Drugs Director Richard Crout
states in "The Cancer Letter":
"when anyone other than large institutions ask permission
to conduct clinical trials, you want harsh regulations"
"sometimes we say it is proper to hinder research"
"and once these guidelines were adopted,
the FDA would consider itself 'bound' by them."
"I never have and never will approve a new drug to an individual,
but only to a large pharmaceutical firm with unlimited finances."
And so, the fiercest fight in FDA history began.
Dr. Burzynski's dealings with the FDA commenced in 1983.
At that point the FDA commenced a civil action to try to close the
clinic and stop all patients from receiving the medicine.
Before the judge in this case had announced her ruling,
the FDA sent her a letter, warning her in advance,
"if this court declines to grant the injunction sought be the government"
"thus permitting continued manufacture
and distribution of antineoplastons"
"the government would then be obliged
to pursue other less efficient remedies"
"such as actions for seizure"
(also known as raiding his clinic and home)
"and condemnation of the drugs"
(also known as a propaganda campaign)
"or criminal prosecution of individuals"
(also known as throwing Dr. Burzynski in prison)
Regardless of these threats from the FDA:
... the judge in the case basically said
he can treat anybody he wants in Texas,
but he can't ship his medicine in interstate commerce.
The FDA viewed that as a failure and told
Dr. Burzynski's attorneys at the time that
they "have other ways to get him".
Let's talk about the other ways.
In 1985, the FDA convened a grand jury to hear
evidence to try to indict Dr. Burzynski.
In connection with that they had a raid of his clinic
where they seized 200,000 pieces of paper including
all of his medical records of all patients.
It's a little difficult to practice medicine when
you don't have medical records.
Obviously they came armed,
and they confiscated all of our medical records.
It took us about 12 to 14 years to recover these medical records.
In the meantime we were permitted to make
copies of these medical records in their office.
But it was also a neglect of human well-being,
we were treating very sick people
and they took their medical records,
we needed these medical records to
fight for the lives of these patients.
But they took this away, they didn't care for these patients,
the patients could die. They were not important.
They presented the evidence to the grand jury, no indictment.
In 1986 they come back and seize another
100,000 documents, no indictment.
I just have a lot of trouble in knowing how much pain-
and what people go through that have cancer,
and since 1967 you've been saying "I can help these patients", and
people are saying to you "forget it", "you aren't allowed to help them",
and you have gone outside of the county
and they accept what you are doing,
and here we say "no"? Are we that backwards doctor?
Yes.
What do you mean yes?
Are we that backward?
Yes.
It's very unfortunate that there is a big gap between people's pain
and suffering, and what the powers that be are willing to accept, or
how they allow cancer patients to be treated.
It's difficult for doctors to deny 10 or 12 years of their medical
training, and suddenly believe that some guy from Houston
has invented an effective therapy by himself.
Isn't it part of your problem that the treatment of cancer is a very
profitable industry for a lot of companies and that your treatment
will threaten those companies profits?
Bingo!
I would think that the people who administer chemotherapy,
and the drug companies, would have a very good reason for
not supporting you.
As Dr. Burzynski has pointed out himself, the patients he's treating are
patients who are not currently eligible for chemotherapy or radiation.
If we were to find a new drug that had a high cure rate of cancer, it
would give us the opportunity to treat many patients for whom we
do not currently have effective therapies now.
In 1990, another grand jury, either the second or the third,
they present more documents,
Dr. Burzynski testifies extensively before the grand jury,
no indictment.
In 1991 to 1993, the FDA investigates Dr. Burzynski,
we don't know if evidence was presented to another grand jury.
In 1994, another grand jury, no indictment.
this grand jury started in March of this year, on March 25th
it was Dr. Burzynski along with a few of his patients
appeared on CBS Show This Morning...
Let me play devil's advocate,
you all were very desperate folk,
you had undergone some cancer treatment correct?
None at all for you?
No, I had no treatment
you had undergone some treatment,
could it not have been that the treatment that you
received prior to Dr. Burzynski's treatment was what
I'll jump on that, no way,
because the recurrence I had was in a brand new spot
that had not been involved before
so if all the punishment that I went through for the year went out of
Translation
Translate and read this script in other languages:
Select another language:
- - Select -
- 简体中文 (Chinese - Simplified)
- 繁體中文 (Chinese - Traditional)
- Español (Spanish)
- Esperanto (Esperanto)
- 日本語 (Japanese)
- Português (Portuguese)
- Deutsch (German)
- العربية (Arabic)
- Français (French)
- Русский (Russian)
- ಕನ್ನಡ (Kannada)
- 한국어 (Korean)
- עברית (Hebrew)
- Gaeilge (Irish)
- Українська (Ukrainian)
- اردو (Urdu)
- Magyar (Hungarian)
- मानक हिन्दी (Hindi)
- Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Italiano (Italian)
- தமிழ் (Tamil)
- Türkçe (Turkish)
- తెలుగు (Telugu)
- ภาษาไทย (Thai)
- Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
- Čeština (Czech)
- Polski (Polish)
- Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Românește (Romanian)
- Nederlands (Dutch)
- Ελληνικά (Greek)
- Latinum (Latin)
- Svenska (Swedish)
- Dansk (Danish)
- Suomi (Finnish)
- فارسی (Persian)
- ייִדיש (Yiddish)
- հայերեն (Armenian)
- Norsk (Norwegian)
- English (English)
Citation
Use the citation below to add this screenplay to your bibliography:
Style:MLAChicagoAPA
"Burzynski" Scripts.com. STANDS4 LLC, 2024. Web. 29 Aug. 2024. <https://www.scripts.com/script/burzynski_4858>.
Discuss this script with the community:
Report Comment
We're doing our best to make sure our content is useful, accurate and safe.
If by any chance you spot an inappropriate comment while navigating through our website please use this form to let us know, and we'll take care of it shortly.
Attachment
You need to be logged in to favorite.
Log In