Citizenfour
1
"Laura, at this stage,
I can offer nothing more than my word.
I am a senior government employee
in the intelligence community.
I hope you understand that
contacting you is extremely high risk
and you are willing to agree
to the following precautions
before I share more.
This will not be a waste of your time.
but should only take minutes
to complete for someone technical.
I would like to confirm out of email
that the keys we exchanged
were not intercepted
and replaced by your surveillance.
Please confirm that no one has
ever had a copy of your private key
and that it uses a strong passphrase.
Assume your adversary is capable
of one trillion guesses per second.
If the device you store the private key
and enter your passphrase on
has been hacked,
it is trivial to decrypt
our communications.
Understand that the above steps
are not bulletproof
and are intended only
to give us breathing room.
In the end, if you publish
the source material,
I will likely be immediately implicated.
This must not deter you from releasing
the information I will provide.
Thank you, and be careful.
Citizenfour."
Bottom line is... surveillance means
that there are facts
If you take away the surveillance,
there are no facts that
the government can manufacture.
Ah, that's right, and this is all
about creating an independent record.
To me, this goes to the question
of independently verifying
what the government is doing.
That's why I keep going
back to that question.
More with David Sirota after CBS news,
traffic, and weather
on KKZN Denver/Boulder, AM 7...
Hey, can you hear me?
I am here, David, how are you?
Well I would just point...
start by pointing to
when he was running for the office
that he now occupies.
In December of 2007, he said, quote,
"The president does not have
the power under the Constitution
to unilaterally
authorize a military attack
in a situation
that does not involve stopping
to the nation."
So by Obama's own words,
the president does not have the power
that he is now exercising
under the Constitution.
And as far as why it matters,
in... on August 1, 2007,
when he laid out his reasons
why he was running for office
and why he thought it was so important
to change the way we were doing things,
he said, quote, "No more ignoring
the law when it's inconvenient.
That is not who we are.
We will again
set an example for the world
that the law is not subject
to the whims of stubborn rulers..."
I didn't. You did.
The surveillance you've experienced
means you've been "selected,"
a term which will mean
more to you as you learn about
how the modern SIGINT system works.
For now, know that
every border you cross,
every purchase you make,
every call you dial,
every cell phone tower you pass,
friend you keep,
article you write, site you visit,
subject line you type,
and packet you route
is in the hands of a system
whose reach is unlimited,
but whose safeguards are not.
Your victimization by the NSA system means
that you are well aware of the threat
that unrestricted secret police
pose for democracies.
This is a story few but you can tell.
Thank you for inviting me here
to give me the opportunity
to express my story.
Let me give you some of my background.
I spent about four years in the military,
and then I went into NSA.
Directly, so...
So I ended up with about
Most of it was a lot of fun, I tell you,
it was really a lot of fun,
breaking these puzzles you know,
solving problems and things like that.
And that's really what I did,
I fundamentally started working with data,
looking at data and data systems
and how you do that.
I was developing
this concept of analysis
that you could lay it out in such a way
that it could be coded
and executed electronically.
Meaning you could automate analysis.
And it has to do with metadata
and using metadata relationships.
So that was the whole,
that was my whole theme there at NSA.
That was eventually,
that's what I ended up to.
I was the only one there
doing that, by the way.
So any rate, 9/11 happened,
and it must have been
right after, a few days,
no more than a week after 9/11
that they decided to begin actively
spying on everyone in this country.
And they wanted the back part
of our program to run all of the spying.
All right?
So, that's exactly what they did.
And then they started
taking the telecom data
I mean the one I knew was AT&T,
and that one provided
320 million records every day.
That program was reauthorized
every 45 days
by what I call the "yes committee,"
which was Hayden and Tenet and the DOJ.
The program was called Stellar Wind.
So first I went to
the House Intelligence Committee
and the staff member
that I personally knew there,
and she then went to
the chairman of the committee,
Nancy Pelosi was the minority rep.
They were all briefed into the program
at the time, by the way,
and all the other programs
that were going on,
including all these CIA programs.
I wasn't alone in this.
There were four others out of NSA,
and we were all
trying to work internally
in the government over these years
trying to get them to come around
to being constitutionally acceptable
and take it into the courts
and have the courts'
oversight of it too.
So we, we naively kept thinking
that could, uh, that could happen.
And it never did.
But any rate, after that,
and all the stuff we were doing
they decided to raid us,
to keep us quiet, threaten us, you know.
So we were raided
simultaneously, four of us.
In my case,
they came in with guns drawn.
I don't know why they did that,
but they did, so...
Laura, I will answer
what I remember of your questions
as best I can.
Forgive the lack of structure.
I am not a writer, and I have
to draft this in a great hurry.
What you know as Stellar Wind has grown.
SSO, the expanded
Special Source Operations
that took over Stellar Wind's
share of the pie,
has spread all over the world
to practically include
comprehensive coverage
of the United States.
Disturbingly,
the amount of US communication
ingested by NSA is still increasing.
Publicly, we complain that
things are going dark,
but in fact, our accesses are improving.
The truth is that the NSA
has never in its history
collected more than it does now.
I know the location of most
domestic interception points
and that the largest
telecommunication companies in the US
are betraying
which I can prove.
We are building the greatest
weapon for oppression
in the history of man,
yet its directors exempt themselves
from accountability.
lied to Congress,
which I can prove.
Billions of US communications
Translation
Translate and read this script in other languages:
Select another language:
- - Select -
- 简体中文 (Chinese - Simplified)
- 繁體中文 (Chinese - Traditional)
- Español (Spanish)
- Esperanto (Esperanto)
- 日本語 (Japanese)
- Português (Portuguese)
- Deutsch (German)
- العربية (Arabic)
- Français (French)
- Русский (Russian)
- ಕನ್ನಡ (Kannada)
- 한국어 (Korean)
- עברית (Hebrew)
- Gaeilge (Irish)
- Українська (Ukrainian)
- اردو (Urdu)
- Magyar (Hungarian)
- मानक हिन्दी (Hindi)
- Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Italiano (Italian)
- தமிழ் (Tamil)
- Türkçe (Turkish)
- తెలుగు (Telugu)
- ภาษาไทย (Thai)
- Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
- Čeština (Czech)
- Polski (Polish)
- Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Românește (Romanian)
- Nederlands (Dutch)
- Ελληνικά (Greek)
- Latinum (Latin)
- Svenska (Swedish)
- Dansk (Danish)
- Suomi (Finnish)
- فارسی (Persian)
- ייִדיש (Yiddish)
- հայերեն (Armenian)
- Norsk (Norwegian)
- English (English)
Citation
Use the citation below to add this screenplay to your bibliography:
Style:MLAChicagoAPA
"Citizenfour" Scripts.com. STANDS4 LLC, 2024. Web. 13 Nov. 2024. <https://www.scripts.com/script/citizenfour_5600>.
Discuss this script with the community:
Report Comment
We're doing our best to make sure our content is useful, accurate and safe.
If by any chance you spot an inappropriate comment while navigating through our website please use this form to let us know, and we'll take care of it shortly.
Attachment
You need to be logged in to favorite.
Log In