Countdown To Zero Page #4
If a terrorist thinks
that the portal monitor
might detect weapon,
they set it off in the port.
highly enriched uranium is
easy to smuggle
the radiation is very weak.
The detectors that we are
putting in place now
would have no chance of detecting
HEU:
in a cargo container.
The signature of highly enriched uranium
is so slight
that they would have to set
the monitors very high
to detect it,and so
they are getting
thousands of false alarms
every day.
Toilets, will set it off
china
Ceramics,
stones like granites,
lot of biological materials
like tobacco, some algae,
televisions ,the
old style televisions,
kitty litter,lot of chemical products,
and well other stuff also
bomb into the United States?
Ship it in a truck with a kitty litter
No one would ever find it
They are great for really
radioactive stuff,
like cesium or something
that might be used
in a "dirty bomb."
But for the stuff that you
would use to make a nuclear bomb
that would incenerate the
heart of a major city
they are not gonna detect that.
Robert Oppenheimer
in 1946, he appeared in a
closed door session
of the Senate,
and one of the senators
asked him
if nuclear terrorism
was a potential threat.
He said "Of course"
"Terrorists could bring a
bomb into New York City
"And destroy the city."
Somebody asked him :
"How would you stop it?"
He said:
"With a screwdriver,
"To open up every container
that comes into this city. "
Once you have smuggled the highly enriched uranium
into the U.S.you would need a
place to build the bomb.
The bomb could be built
right in the target city.
The hard part was
what we did in 1945.
The hard part is doing
it the first time.
This is no longer a conceptual challenge
There is no trick.
There is no magic
that needs to be figured out
It's really just an engineering challenge
It's definitely not rocket science.
The rocket science
is more difficult.
you can make a
very simple weapon,
a so called gun type weapon
which was the one used in Hiroshima
It was so simple we didnt even test it
before we dropped it
It is essentially just
a gun barrel.
with a target and you can projectile,
and you propel the projectile into the target.
you will need an artillary gun
to fire a
one piece of HEU in the other,
which would be bolted
onto the muscle of the gun
The military sells these
things as surplus,
but they sell them to save it
You would have to make the
gun capable of shooting again
and you would want to test fire the gun
to make sure that
that it fired the
projectile at the right speed.
This is the only thing that
you would need to do off-site.
you would need a
group of people ...
lets say,between 15 to 20 to 25,
who would be knowledgable in
particular aspects
of weapons designs
of explosives.
Two or three people
to do the machining,
two or three people to
work on the gun
two or three people
to work on electronics,
People who are experts
in ballistics
People who know something
about nuclear physics.
you just need the machinist and metallar
just to make the pieces into the right
shapes and make sure they fit together
Ordinary explosives and
detonators
maybe some
electronic equipment.
You can go online
and easily find the
blade for $ 10,000.
you could find the furnace
for about $ 50,000.
And you can even find the
surplus recoilless rifle
probably also
for $ 10,000.
More than 90% of the effort
in the Manhattan Project
was making the
nuclear material
to make
the nuclear bomb.
If you can get hold of
that nuclear material,
then it doesnt take a
Manhattan Project to make a bomb.
If the circumstances
are right,
acquiring a
complete bomb
may be easier
than building one
In Algeria, in 1961,
officers within the French
millitary rebelled
and tried to seize a nuclear weapon.
As the rebels closed in
the weapon was detonated in a
degraded explosion
to prevent it from falling into the
hands of the rebelling officers.
The Japanese death terror cult, Aum Shinrikyo,
attemted to buy a nuclear
bomb from the Soviet Union.
They had a lot of resources,
We are talking well over
billion dollars of assets.
and secondly they had
tremendous access. At one point,
the group had more members in Russia in the
former Soviet Union than they had in Japan
In 1994, a senior leader made eight trips to Russia
His personal notebook
included a shopping list
for $ 15 million.
A perfectly secure nuclear weapon
is also a perfectly
unusable one
So here one has this paradox
between security and usability
Where is the worlds most dangerous place right now?
mu money it is Pakistan.
you have got an unstable government,
plus enough material for
up to a 100 nuclear weapons,
plus Osama bin Laden in the country.
What we have seen over the last two or three years
has been a spiral that has
been going downwards
Destabilization,the
spread of the Taliban,
the spread of radicalism,
the collapse of the economy.
So could there be a cornals coup in Pakistan
by Islamic radicals
within the military
and then could nuclear
weapons be at risk?
What happens if that country destablises?
What happens if the
army splits?
Who gets the weapons?
Who gets the
material for the weapons?
Who gets the scientists
who know how to build the weapons?
There is no such thing as perfect command and control
over the nuclear weapons,
even in the sophasticated
of the arsenals.
from the levels of the presidents gone down
there are human weaknesses,
technical problems
deficiencies and
vulnerabilities.
I was the launch officer for
Minuteman missiles.
and I spent three years
in Montana in a hole
in an undergorund launch
control centre
I was one of the guys responsible for
for getting these missiles off ground
in one minute. we didnt call them
"Minuteman missiles" for nothing.
When I was serving in the Air Force
as the launch officer,
there was a device in the launch control centre
into which 12 digits
had to be dialed in
in order to unlock the missiles for firing
This had been installed under Robert McNamara
over the objections of the Strategic Air Command
Since they couldnt prevent the panel from being installed
the StrategicAir Command
in Omaha
had set these codes to zero
and we all knew it.
That was the secret unlock code
for firing
our missiles:
In fact, in our launch
check list
we had to ensure
that the unlock code
was set to al zeros
before we completed
the launch sequence.
This changed in 1977
when they started using
actual codes.
But until then, I and one other
crew member
could have actually
formatted a launch order
a completely valid launch order
and transmitted it to the
entire American stratergic arsenal.
Looks like we are in a shooting war
Oh hell.Oh the russians have got it?
i think:
Thats what i have been told / ijust came in on the
red phone.
Translation
Translate and read this script in other languages:
Select another language:
- - Select -
- 简体中文 (Chinese - Simplified)
- 繁體中文 (Chinese - Traditional)
- Español (Spanish)
- Esperanto (Esperanto)
- 日本語 (Japanese)
- Português (Portuguese)
- Deutsch (German)
- العربية (Arabic)
- Français (French)
- Русский (Russian)
- ಕನ್ನಡ (Kannada)
- 한국어 (Korean)
- עברית (Hebrew)
- Gaeilge (Irish)
- Українська (Ukrainian)
- اردو (Urdu)
- Magyar (Hungarian)
- मानक हिन्दी (Hindi)
- Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Italiano (Italian)
- தமிழ் (Tamil)
- Türkçe (Turkish)
- తెలుగు (Telugu)
- ภาษาไทย (Thai)
- Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
- Čeština (Czech)
- Polski (Polish)
- Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Românește (Romanian)
- Nederlands (Dutch)
- Ελληνικά (Greek)
- Latinum (Latin)
- Svenska (Swedish)
- Dansk (Danish)
- Suomi (Finnish)
- فارسی (Persian)
- ייִדיש (Yiddish)
- հայերեն (Armenian)
- Norsk (Norwegian)
- English (English)
Citation
Use the citation below to add this screenplay to your bibliography:
Style:MLAChicagoAPA
"Countdown To Zero" Scripts.com. STANDS4 LLC, 2024. Web. 28 Dec. 2024. <https://www.scripts.com/script/countdown_to_zero_5968>.
Discuss this script with the community:
Report Comment
We're doing our best to make sure our content is useful, accurate and safe.
If by any chance you spot an inappropriate comment while navigating through our website please use this form to let us know, and we'll take care of it shortly.
Attachment
You need to be logged in to favorite.
Log In