Dancing in the Dark: The End of Physics? Page #7
- Year:
- 2015
- 19 Views
think the dark matter distribution
in our galaxy should look like.
As I see it, they see, essentially,
the sort of excess we've been
talking about for years.
That's a great step.
They haven't been saying that
until very recently.
So I think it's very exciting
because this could be
the first time that we are seeing
dark matter shining.
However, there is a lot more
work that we need to do to
actually confirm that what we're
seeing is dark matter.
So, we're heading in the right
direction? Right direction.
Maybe not there yet, but definitely
in the right direction.
So you're happy that the
last few years' work
hasn't been a complete
waste of time?
It doesn't seem to have been
OK, good.
It might be that, finally, science
is making inroads
into the mysterious non-visible
world of dark matter, perhaps.
and if all the fingers being
crossed in Switzerland
and France pay off, then, at least
in theory, the deep-mine scientists
will simply have the formality
of looking in the right place.
Dark matter identified,
standard models intact,
Nobel prizes handed out.
that, the end of the story.
But you'd be wrong, because there's
another problem, another
dark thing that is a description
of something we don't understand.
It's called dark energy.
So, 15 years ago some astronomers
observing distant supernovae
saw that the distance to
those supernovae was larger
than they expected,
and so the only way that they could
understand that was to have a
universe that started accelerating
whether that carries on accelerating
or not, we don't know, but what
we do know is that there has to be
another component to the universe
which we call this dark energy.
But you don't know what it is?
No idea. Not at all.
No-one knows what it is?
No-one. No-one.
There are more theories than
there are theoreticians.
And that's a problem,
because according to the standard
model of cosmology,
it makes up most of the universe.
Our universe
consists of 4% baryonic matter.
26% dark matter.
And 70% dark energy.
And because dark energy
seems to make sense,
at least at a theoretical level,
it's the role of experimentalists
like Bob
to think of ways to explain it.
That's why he's come here to the
Dark Energy Survey
at Cerro Tololo, where one of the
world's largest digital cameras
scans the night sky
in search of more supernovae
and an ever more accurate picture
of the universe's expansion history.
You can probably see some
of the stars, and in here will be
some of the supernovae that we're
hunting to measure dark energy.
So are you hopeful?
I am hopeful.
I think we will be able to make at
least a factor-of-ten improvement
with using this instrument,
than we have today.
And then if we don't get that,
we'll have to wait for LSST.
The LSST,
the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope,
is being built on another Chilean
mountain and is due to come
on stream in 2021, representing
a significant jump in resolution.
With this instrument, we can observe
about 3,000 supernovae.
With the LSST we'll be able to
observe about a million supernovae,
and that should really nail it.
OK.
It won't though, will it? Actually?
THEY LAUGH:
See...
It'll nail it, it will nail it.
What, what will it nail?
Well, it'll nail the expansion
history of the universe
and then, hopefully, some bright
theorist will come up with...
So it's not going to nail
dark energy.
It'll just show you how it's
expanding?
It'll show us how the
universe is expanding
and then, hopefully, that will
give us some direction
in which to understand
the true nature of dark energy.
It could be that cosmology
stands on the cusp of revealing
the true nature of our universe.
Then again, it may
stand on the cusp of nothing at all.
It might be that the only way to
progress is not to look harder,
but to embrace a new physics
that's currently,
like the dark universe,
just out of reach.
HE EXHALES:
HE LAUGHS:
Translation
Translate and read this script in other languages:
Select another language:
- - Select -
- 简体中文 (Chinese - Simplified)
- 繁體中文 (Chinese - Traditional)
- Español (Spanish)
- Esperanto (Esperanto)
- 日本語 (Japanese)
- Português (Portuguese)
- Deutsch (German)
- العربية (Arabic)
- Français (French)
- Русский (Russian)
- ಕನ್ನಡ (Kannada)
- 한국어 (Korean)
- עברית (Hebrew)
- Gaeilge (Irish)
- Українська (Ukrainian)
- اردو (Urdu)
- Magyar (Hungarian)
- मानक हिन्दी (Hindi)
- Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Italiano (Italian)
- தமிழ் (Tamil)
- Türkçe (Turkish)
- తెలుగు (Telugu)
- ภาษาไทย (Thai)
- Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
- Čeština (Czech)
- Polski (Polish)
- Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Românește (Romanian)
- Nederlands (Dutch)
- Ελληνικά (Greek)
- Latinum (Latin)
- Svenska (Swedish)
- Dansk (Danish)
- Suomi (Finnish)
- فارسی (Persian)
- ייִדיש (Yiddish)
- հայերեն (Armenian)
- Norsk (Norwegian)
- English (English)
Citation
Use the citation below to add this screenplay to your bibliography:
Style:MLAChicagoAPA
"Dancing in the Dark: The End of Physics?" Scripts.com. STANDS4 LLC, 2025. Web. 20 Jan. 2025. <https://www.scripts.com/script/dancing_in_the_dark:_the_end_of_physics_6271>.
Discuss this script with the community:
Report Comment
We're doing our best to make sure our content is useful, accurate and safe.
If by any chance you spot an inappropriate comment while navigating through our website please use this form to let us know, and we'll take care of it shortly.
Attachment
You need to be logged in to favorite.
Log In