Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed Page #3
The people in the--
from the discovery institute--
The people who are doing
the intelligent design--
They're all varnish
and no product.
The discovery institute
is a propaganda mill.
It's a--
it's an institution
Designed to suck in money
from religious investors
And turn it into a sanitized,
somewhat secular version
Of the creation story
to get it into the schools.
If they have a way
of understanding nature
That's superior
to the one that we all
Are making lots of
discoveries using, great.
- bring it on.
- [rings]
[norman greenbaum's
"spirit in the sky" plays]
We are really,
really lost.
I think it's on third.
I think it's on third.
I think it's down there.
I have no idea
where this place is.
I guess I just
keep walking.
Do you have any idea where
Have you ever heard
of that?
- stein:
okay, thank you.- man:
hey, ben.- how are you, sir?
- man:
i'm good. Yourself?- good.
Do you have any idea where
- not a clue.
- discovery institute?
- thank you, it's very kind
of you to offer--
- welcome to seattle.
Thank you, sir.
It's gotta be
this whole building.
Yes, where is
the discovery institute,
please?
Discovery institute--
on the eighth floor,
suite 808.
when I die
and they lay me to rest
gonna go to the place
that's the best
Okay, very good.
when I lay me
down to die
goin' up
to the spirit in the sky
Aha, success at last.
goin' up
to the spirit in the sky
Aha, we found you.
Are you bruce chapman?
- I am.
- how are you?
I'm ben stein.
- welcome.
- kind of you to have me here.
Delighted to meet you.
Can I look around
and see your offices?
Absolutely.
Do you just have
this floor,
Or do you have several
other floors as well?
- chapman:
no, this is it.
- this is it?
You've made
an awful lot of trouble
For being such
a small office.
I thought it was going
to be like the pentagon.
We're like
the little boy that said
the emperor has no clothes.
And he didn't have
a big organization either.
When you go around
and raise funds,
Your people are
not saying to them,
"by the way,
we're going to get
"all these scientists
out of the classroom
And put christ back
in the classroom?"
Well, I don't know
that christ
Has ever been
in the science classroom.
This is not
a religious argument.
This is something
that people--
We have fellows
who are jewish
or agnostic
There are--there are
moslem scientists.
There are people
of all kinds of backgrounds
Who agree
that darwin's theory
has failed.
So why would you bring
religion into it?
You don't need religion.
This is a red herring, ben.
People who don't have
an argument
Are reduced to throwing
sand in your eyes.
If the discovery institute
Could get its wish
about this subject,
What would your wish be?
Well, on this subject,
as on others,
We'd like people
to be able to have
A robust dialogue
and even a debate
Where the best evidence--
In this case
the best scientific evidence--
Is made available to people.
Surely no one questions
there should be a debate.
Oh, yes, they do.
- they do?
- they say the debate
has been settled,
- that the issue's settled.
- when was the debate settled?
Ben, i'd like you to talk
to the scientists.
You don't want to get
your science from me.
nothing to do with religion,
So why was my first stop
biola university,
Formerly known
as the bible institute
of los angeles?
[johnny cash's
"personal jesus" plays]
your own personal jesus
someone to hear
your prayers
someone who cares
Nelson:
string theorywill be a footnote
in the history of science.
The inference that
stonehenge was caused
by intelligence...
your own
personal jesus
someone to hear
your prayers
someone who's there
Stein:
how much moneyhave you ever gotten
from jerry falwell?
Uh, zero dollars.
How about
pat robertson?
Zero.
Are you a minister?
No.
- are you a priest?
- no.
- pastor?
- no.
- youth pastor?
- no.
I did teach
Sunday school once.
Hasn't this all
been resolved?
Aren't we all
darwinists now,
Except for a few
cranks like you?
Well, it's a funny thing
that questions
That aren't properly answered
don't go away.
This question
is loaded with all kinds
of political baggage,
But one-on-one
at a scientific meeting
After the third
or fourth beer,
My experience has been
That many
evolutionary biologists
Will say, "yeah,
this theory's got
a lot of problems."
So you mean to tell me
About whether or not
evolution occurred?
Well, "evolution"
is a kind of funny word.
It depends
on how one defines it.
If it means simply
change over time,
Even the most rock-ribbed
fundamentalist
Knows that the history
of the earth has changed--
That there's been
change over time.
If you define evolution
precisely, though,
To mean the common descent
of all life on earth
From a single ancestor
Via undirected mutation
and natural selection--
That's textbook definition
of neo-darwinism--
Biologists of the first rank
have real questions.
But the modern theory
of intelligent design
Is just microwaved
creationism.
I don't think
that's the case.
Creationism,
properly understood,
Begins with the bible
and says,
"how can I fit the bible
into the data of science?"
Intelligent design
doesn't do that.
Intelligent design
is the study
of patterns in nature
That are best explained
as a result of intelligence.
So intelligent designers
believe that god
is the designer.
Not necessarily.
Intelligent design
is a minimal commitment,
Scientifically,
to the possibility
Of detecting
intelligent causation.
Dr. Nelson didn't
sound like a crazy person,
But I still suspected
id was nothing but
reheated creationism.
My next stop
didn't seem like
It was going
Male country singer:
didn't crawl
out of the ocean
I didn't come
from no monkey
but science tends
to forget
evolution's just a theory
they present it
in the textbooks
and on animal tv
like it's fact
but tell me
were you there
12 million b.C.?
Evolution is a--
from an intelligent design
perspective,
Is perfectly acceptable
if the sense is that
"how did the design
get implemented?"
The issue is, is there
a real design there
And are these
material mechanisms,
Like natural selection,
Are these adequate
to account for everything
We see in biology?
And our argument
is no, it's not.
But darwin produced
all this evidence
From his travels
and his studies
at the galapagos
That evolution
explained things.
If you look
at the history of science,
People often have
a good idea,
And then they decide
just to run with it.
And they say, "we're going
to apply this everywhere."
of natural selection
And says,
"i'm going to explain
Translation
Translate and read this script in other languages:
Select another language:
- - Select -
- 简体中文 (Chinese - Simplified)
- 繁體中文 (Chinese - Traditional)
- Español (Spanish)
- Esperanto (Esperanto)
- 日本語 (Japanese)
- Português (Portuguese)
- Deutsch (German)
- العربية (Arabic)
- Français (French)
- Русский (Russian)
- ಕನ್ನಡ (Kannada)
- 한국어 (Korean)
- עברית (Hebrew)
- Gaeilge (Irish)
- Українська (Ukrainian)
- اردو (Urdu)
- Magyar (Hungarian)
- मानक हिन्दी (Hindi)
- Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Italiano (Italian)
- தமிழ் (Tamil)
- Türkçe (Turkish)
- తెలుగు (Telugu)
- ภาษาไทย (Thai)
- Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
- Čeština (Czech)
- Polski (Polish)
- Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Românește (Romanian)
- Nederlands (Dutch)
- Ελληνικά (Greek)
- Latinum (Latin)
- Svenska (Swedish)
- Dansk (Danish)
- Suomi (Finnish)
- فارسی (Persian)
- ייִדיש (Yiddish)
- հայերեն (Armenian)
- Norsk (Norwegian)
- English (English)
Citation
Use the citation below to add this screenplay to your bibliography:
Style:MLAChicagoAPA
"Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed" Scripts.com. STANDS4 LLC, 2024. Web. 21 Nov. 2024. <https://www.scripts.com/script/expelled:_no_intelligence_allowed_7861>.
Discuss this script with the community:
Report Comment
We're doing our best to make sure our content is useful, accurate and safe.
If by any chance you spot an inappropriate comment while navigating through our website please use this form to let us know, and we'll take care of it shortly.
Attachment
You need to be logged in to favorite.
Log In