Eye in the Sky Page #3
collateral damage estimate.
Yes, yes, and my weapons
only invoke a low CDE.
It's the explosives
inside that house
that bring it to
a potentially high CDE.
And since you know
the explosives are there,
it is incumbent upon you
to take them into account.
I can see a potential
legal objection.
Jesus! We've got two
suicide bombers
and three very high value
individuals inside that house!
And you want them off your
list, I understand that.
But the rules of engagement
you're operating under
envisaged a capture,
not a kill scenario.
Ma'am, I think it
would be wise to refer up.
Are you telling me that,
or just debating with me?
To refer up?
Mmm-hmm.
- I am telling you.
- Oh!
(PHONE RINGS)
- Benson.
- COLONEL POWELL: Sir.
Legal has advised me to refer
up to the Attorney General.
I need a quick answer, Frank.
Okay,
I'll put that to him.
George.
Those explosives mean there
is an imminent threat
of serious harm to
the civilian population.
Can we strike?
Well, given the new
circumstances, I would say yes.
Brian.
There is a political as well as
a legal call to be made here.
Yes, I'm quite
aware of that, George.
We need a decision
now, Minister.
Legally, we don't
have a problem?
No, we don't.
But politically...
Do we have
permission to proceed?
Well,
- you seem to be implying yes, George.
- Thank you.
- Hold on a minute. Hold on.
- No. That is not what I...
This is a change of mission from a
capture to a shoot-to-kill, isn't it?
Yes, it is.
ANGELA:
Are we all right with that?
I'm sure we are not.
There are two British citizens
and an American as targets.
This mission has
the full support
of Kenya and
the United States.
For a drone strike?
Yes, a missile
fired from an RPA
is part of
an agreed contingency plan
in circumstances like this.
Do we have
permission to proceed?
No. Such a plan should not
have been signed off by the PM
without the
authority of Parliament.
Operational issues are not
generally discussed at Cabinet,
and certainly
not at Parliament.
I know the protocol.
I'm talking about what should be happening.
Angela, in my view,
all the legal criteria
for an attack
have been met.
Namely, this is
a military necessity,
there is no
reasonable alternative,
and the force to be used is
in proportion to the threat.
That should
answer your question.
It does not, George.
Has there ever been a British-led
drone attack on a city
in a friendly country
that is not at war?
General?
I do not believe so, no.
Then how can
we sanction it?
Generate new damage rings
for the compound
with an assessment of the
payload on those jackets.
- Yes, ma'am.
- Right now.
(PHONE RINGING)
- Colonel Walsh.
- COLONEL POWELL: Colonel.
Can I speak to
your pilot directly?
Yes, ma'am.
Patch me through.
Steve.
to you directly. Pick up.
Ma'am.
Lieutenant.
You are now our best option
to take these HVIs out.
Now, prepare to launch
a single AGM-114 Hellfire
on the target house.
- Yes, ma'am.
- This is a friendly city,
so collateral damage
must be kept to a minimum.
- Ma'am...
- Yes?
I have an ROE question.
Is my government
aware that we are
targeting a person
with a US passport?
Yes. Yes, it is,
Lieutenant.
I didn't see anything
Lieutenant, we have
new rules of engagement.
You are covered.
so be ready to shoot.
Yes, ma'am.
Running the dash
34 checklist.
Carrie, call when ready.
You ever shot a Hellfire?
No.
GERSHON:
Or anything?No. I've only ever
been the eye.
You?
GERSHON:
Me, too.Looks like it's your
lucky day today, guys.
Just stay cool, okay?
Be all right.
LIEUTENANT WATTS:
Yes, sir.
Carrie, call when ready.
Slant range 22,000 feet.
High-impact angle.
Stand by for targeting brief.
Ready.
Angela, I agree,
we are at risk of being perceived
as embarking on
a shoot-to-kill policy.
But since all the legal
criteria are sound,
military action to continue.
ANGELA:
Legally we may be safe,
but politically we're
walking into a minefield.
Especially with an
American citizen involved.
Do I have permission,
Minister?
BRIAN:
Um...Given the situation,
that it is a change of mission,
that it is now a missile
attack on a British subject,
two British subjects,
and an American citizen,
and in a friendly country,
I think it is
only right and proper
that I refer this up to
the Foreign Secretary.
Minister, you've heard
the arguments, he hasn't.
And the rules of
engagement mean that
the Prime Minister
- No...
- Therefore,
the Foreign Secretary's input
should not be rendered...
No, the point is that
I have not been party
to any previous discussion
with the Prime Minister
about matters
such as this,
whereas the Foreign Secretary
undoubtedly has.
So, actually, it is my
duty to refer to him.
And what am I
telling Colonel Powell?
Tell her to wait!
- (COMPUTER CHIMES)
- Oh, Christ Almighty!
- (ALL APPLAUDING)
- JAMES:
Thank you.As a member of the
British government,
I am proud to introduce
Integrated Battlefield Solutions,
field in the production
of life-saving,
lightweight military clothing.
Protecting our soldiers
in the field of battle
is at the core
of my government's
commitment to
our armed forces.
"Soldier safety first"
is why we 're in...
Excuse me.
Oh, God, he's gonna
throw up!
TOM:
I told himnot to eat the prawns.
Excuse me.
And so I'm very pleased to introduce
Mr. Nigel Adler.
NIGEL:
Thank you very much,Foreign Secretary.
Today we're introducing the Adamant
Assault Body Armor System.
- Do we have that CDE yet?
- Yes, ma'am.
Good.
SERGEANT SADDIQ:
If we target this cornerroom here, where the explosives are,
mortality rate in that room
and an 80 to 90% rate within
the rest of the house.
but this area
here in the street...
A 65 to 75% rate.
That's just the Hellfire.
If we factor in
the explosives in the vests,
we're looking at even more extensive
damage way out to this area here.
But I can't accurately
estimate that yield.
But we would be containing
that payload in the vests
within those walls, right?
Far less
collateral damage
than them going off in
Yes. Of course.
Yeah. Thank you.
Obvious to anyone not trying
(PROTESTORS SHOUTING
INDISTINCTLY)
The meeting with the Malaysian
Trade Minister is now at 4:30.
You'll have to
do it for me.
But, sir, the whole
point of us being here...
Yeah, maybe if you
take an Eezi Tum.
Look. I need to go
back to the hotel now.
BRIAN:
Jack, what's the holdup?
I'm sorry, sir, I'm trying
to reach him.
Minister, the consequences
of delay
may be fatal to
scores of civilians.
I'm well aware
of that, General,
Translation
Translate and read this script in other languages:
Select another language:
- - Select -
- 简体中文 (Chinese - Simplified)
- 繁體中文 (Chinese - Traditional)
- Español (Spanish)
- Esperanto (Esperanto)
- 日本語 (Japanese)
- Português (Portuguese)
- Deutsch (German)
- العربية (Arabic)
- Français (French)
- Русский (Russian)
- ಕನ್ನಡ (Kannada)
- 한국어 (Korean)
- עברית (Hebrew)
- Gaeilge (Irish)
- Українська (Ukrainian)
- اردو (Urdu)
- Magyar (Hungarian)
- मानक हिन्दी (Hindi)
- Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Italiano (Italian)
- தமிழ் (Tamil)
- Türkçe (Turkish)
- తెలుగు (Telugu)
- ภาษาไทย (Thai)
- Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
- Čeština (Czech)
- Polski (Polish)
- Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Românește (Romanian)
- Nederlands (Dutch)
- Ελληνικά (Greek)
- Latinum (Latin)
- Svenska (Swedish)
- Dansk (Danish)
- Suomi (Finnish)
- فارسی (Persian)
- ייִדיש (Yiddish)
- հայերեն (Armenian)
- Norsk (Norwegian)
- English (English)
Citation
Use the citation below to add this screenplay to your bibliography:
Style:MLAChicagoAPA
"Eye in the Sky" Scripts.com. STANDS4 LLC, 2024. Web. 21 Nov. 2024. <https://www.scripts.com/script/eye_in_the_sky_7897>.
Discuss this script with the community:
Report Comment
We're doing our best to make sure our content is useful, accurate and safe.
If by any chance you spot an inappropriate comment while navigating through our website please use this form to let us know, and we'll take care of it shortly.
Attachment
You need to be logged in to favorite.
Log In