First Freedom: The Fight for Religious Liberty Page #10
- Year:
- 2012
- 84 min
- 87 Views
the vice president,
was outraged.
The election campaign
of 1800 was bitter.
George:
The electionof 1800 was a crucial moment
in our national history.
People think our politics
today is polarized--and it is--
but, boy, if you wanted
to see polarization,
you should look
at the election of 1800--
bitterness, recriminations,
nasty campaigning.
Mitchell:
Jefferson hiredJames callender,
a writer who specialized
in political slander.
Adams a fool, a hypocrite,
a criminal, a tyrant,
but Adams'
supporters retaliated.
Jefferson was branded
a weakling, a libertine,
and a coward.
Perhaps the worst
accusation of all--
this politician who said he was
"in a sect by myself,"
did he believe in God at all?
Man:
"The only question to"laying his hand
on his heart, is
"shall I continue
in allegiance to God
"and a religious president
or impiously declare
for Jefferson and no God?"
Wood:
Jefferson was accusedof being an atheist,
and he felt he was
not an atheist.
He never was.
He learned his lesson,
which Franklin had voiced
several years earlier.
1784 he said, "look.
Anybody who speaks out
"against religion,
it's like spitting in the wind.
You just don't
do it in America."
Mitchell:
The brutalityof the campaign severed
the old friendship.
It was a tragedy of spirit
that seemed to endanger
everything that
the two great men had worked
so hard to create--
Brinkley:
There was great feardestroyed because suddenly
this two-party system
had reared its head,
and the Adams crowd,
the federalists, were saying
that he was a pagan--
Thomas Jefferson--
a crazy deist,
and that he was going to
forever ban christianity
in the United States,
and it got very heated.
Mitchell:
The partisanmaelstrom created genuine fear.
Citizens actually believed
that Jefferson
would banish the Bible.
Bushman:
In 1800,one of the questions was,
"are we going to go
the jeffersonian/baptist route
"with no established religions
of any kind
"and take the risk that
religion will diminish
in America and virtue
will go down with it?"
Mitchell:
It was a closeand confused election.
In the end, Jefferson won.
Fenster:
The electionproved a point that
reverberates to this day,
that the implementation
of religious freedom
and separation of church
and state were laws
laid down by the founders,
but the protection
in the hands
of the people.
Man as Jefferson:
If the freedom for religion,
guaranteed to us
by law in theory,
can ever rise in practice under
the overbearing inquisition
of public opinion,
truth will prevail
over fanaticism.
Thomas Jefferson.
Mitchell:
Jeffersonand Madison both realized
that freedom is
a greater spur than force.
The absence of federal
government intervention
actually helped religion
to grow.
Hatch:
There wastremendous upsurge.
I was reading the diary
of William Bentley,
who kept talking about
how the common people
of the town were holding
night religious meetings,
sailors preaching,
there would be women preaching,
there would be
African-Americans preaching.
I shout, "hallelujah,"
when I think of his life.
Butler:
The first amendmentforbids an establishment
and also protects the right
of religious worship,
and both of them working
together have encouraged
religious groups to go out
and seek members.
In the old days,
in the days of an establishment,
you didn't need
to seek members
because the state paid
for religious services.
Hatch:
Look atin America, and you can
find forms of faith
that the founding fathers
would have found unimaginable
but would have given
free choice
to any individual to belong
to a wide variety of groups
or to no group,
and I think that
would have pleased them.
Butler:
The stateof the United States
at the beginning
of the 21st century suggests
that they were
completely correct.
They couldn't have
been more correct.
We now live
in a society that has
far more religions,
far more religious
participation,
far more religion involved
in the nature of society
than happened to have
been true at the time
of the American revolution
and the creation
of the first amendment,
and that in part is
a testament
to their conviction
that religion would
flourish on its own.
Meacham:
The great good newsabout the country
is that religion has shaped us
without strangling us.
Mitchell:
The Americanrevolution we all know
came with drums and guns,
with battle and bloodshed.
The quieter revolution
was less spectacular
and much slower,
coming only step by step,
but it was more
unique in human history.
This was the story
of an idea,
a government devoted
to maintaining liberty,
not uniformity.
Bushman:
The story of libertyIt requires constant attention,
constant thought.
It requires argument and debate,
and only out of that process
can we achieve
the goal that we want,
which is religious freedom
for all.
Wood:
The founding fathersnot only created
the institutions by which
but they infused
into the culture, our culture,
all of our highest aspirations,
our ideals,
our greatest values,
including religious liberty
being one of the most important.
The struggle
a perennial struggle.
There will always be
the temptation
to cut back
on religious freedom.
There will always be
some end in view,
some fear that people have
that will tempt us as a people
to dishonor
the fundamental right
to religious freedom
into the public square.
It was a world historic
contribution to say that
"yes, religion matters
for the health
"of a society,
but government
as they see fit."
It is a system that we should
change with great care,
if at all.
Mitchell:
Ben Franklinwas the first to go.
By 1790, he was 84
and quite ill.
One day his daughter said,
"I hope, father,
that you will yet recover,
and live many years."
"I hope not,"
Ben Franklin said.
His wish was granted.
He died that April, 1790.
It was soon discovered
that he'd added a note
onto his will.
Man as Franklin:
My fine crab-tree walking stick
with a gold head
curiously wrought
in the form
of a cap of liberty
I give to my friend
and the friend of mankind
George Washington.
Mitchell:
Washingtonbefore he could rest
from his 8 years as president.
It was 1796 before
he would write
his farewell address
to the American people.
An advisor suggested
that Washington mention
"a generally received
and divinely authoritative
religion"in the address.
Washington refused,
but he believed that faith
needed to be a part
of the national character.
Translation
Translate and read this script in other languages:
Select another language:
- - Select -
- 简体中文 (Chinese - Simplified)
- 繁體中文 (Chinese - Traditional)
- Español (Spanish)
- Esperanto (Esperanto)
- 日本語 (Japanese)
- Português (Portuguese)
- Deutsch (German)
- العربية (Arabic)
- Français (French)
- Русский (Russian)
- ಕನ್ನಡ (Kannada)
- 한국어 (Korean)
- עברית (Hebrew)
- Gaeilge (Irish)
- Українська (Ukrainian)
- اردو (Urdu)
- Magyar (Hungarian)
- मानक हिन्दी (Hindi)
- Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Italiano (Italian)
- தமிழ் (Tamil)
- Türkçe (Turkish)
- తెలుగు (Telugu)
- ภาษาไทย (Thai)
- Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
- Čeština (Czech)
- Polski (Polish)
- Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Românește (Romanian)
- Nederlands (Dutch)
- Ελληνικά (Greek)
- Latinum (Latin)
- Svenska (Swedish)
- Dansk (Danish)
- Suomi (Finnish)
- فارسی (Persian)
- ייִדיש (Yiddish)
- հայերեն (Armenian)
- Norsk (Norwegian)
- English (English)
Citation
Use the citation below to add this screenplay to your bibliography:
Style:MLAChicagoAPA
"First Freedom: The Fight for Religious Liberty" Scripts.com. STANDS4 LLC, 2024. Web. 18 Nov. 2024. <https://www.scripts.com/script/first_freedom:_the_fight_for_religious_liberty_8246>.
Discuss this script with the community:
Report Comment
We're doing our best to make sure our content is useful, accurate and safe.
If by any chance you spot an inappropriate comment while navigating through our website please use this form to let us know, and we'll take care of it shortly.
Attachment
You need to be logged in to favorite.
Log In