GMO OMG Page #6
and delighted to see
Republican and Democrat
representatives
and Senators with us
all of whom believe as we do
that people have
the right to know
what they're putting
in their bodies.
Connecticut's GMO
labeling provision
was eliminated after Monsanto
threatened to sue the state.
attempted to label GMOs,
but none have succeeded.
And yet, over 60 countries
around the world
require labeling of GMOs
including Russia,
India, even China.
By far, the biggest attempt to
label GMOs at the state level
was California's ballot
initiative proposition 37.
to label GMOs in California,
45 million dollars to defeat it
and won a narrow victory
by just 3% of the vote.
You said it's in
all of the foods,
80% of the foods?
80% of processed foods.
And I eat a lot of
processed foods.
So, you eat GMOs,
but you didn't know it?
No, sir.
I don't eat processed foods.
Do you eat out ever?
- Do you eat meat, sort of dairy...
- Yeah,
I don't eat meat,
no, no, no meat, no dairy.
Wow. Very good.
Do you eat soy?
Soy, yeah.
93% of soy is
genetically modified.
Oh, why you have
to tell me that.
So, if you eat out, if you...
Oh, we eat out all the time.
Do you eat 100%
organic or just...?
No.
OK.
So, you eat GMOs?
Probably.
We have an organic garden here
in the back of the White House,
and it symbolizes
good healthy food,
and then, behind the walls
of the White House,
they're promoting chemical food
which is untested
and we don't know what
what the environmental
risks are.
This is unbelievable to me
that this irony sitting
right here is so thick.
Where is the outrage?
Today, we produce 4,600
kilocalorie per person per day
at household levels.
That's twice as much as we need.
So, today, we produce enough
food to feed 14 billion people.
Now, who is out there saying
we need to double
The industry obviously.
In 1992,
the biotech industry,
were generally recognized
as safe,
G.R.A.S., a designation only
given to food additives
that have gone through
rigorous scientific testing
and been proven safe by
overwhelming consensus
from experts.
They didn't have
any scientific basis.
There were no peer
reviewed studies.
Absolutely, no
longitudinal studies.
These are relatively
new products
and they then opened
the gates up.
These foods can
create new allergens.
They can make a
nontoxic food toxic.
They can lower immune response.
They do lower nutrition.
We've heard this from our
government scientists
they weren't listening to, but
we know that that was there.
The precautionary
principle says that
if you're not sure,
you don't do it.
And that's not what
is being done today.
There's something
extremely wrong
when a government becomes
captive to one industry
and pushes nonrenewable,
debt-creating seeds,
that destroy biodiversity
and independence
and self reliance.
And we can see now all of sudden
how this all fits together
and who is behind
the government.
It's always the industry
and we know the revolving door
policy here in the US.
Michael Taylor is the
revolving door poster boy.
staff attorney for the FDA.
Then, the joined the law
firm representing Monsanto,
oversaw policy for Monsanto's
genetically engineered
bovine growth hormone.
From there, he headed up
Food Safety and Inspection
at the USDA.
Then, back to Monsanto.
Finally, he has returned
to the FDA
as the second
highest-ranking official
pushing the deregulation
of genetically modified
alfalfa and salmon.
Michael Taylor is one of many
who used government
to feed corporate greed
at public expense.
as many experts
and politicians as possible,
but the rabbit holes
were endless
because GMOs involve almost
everything you can think of,
world hunger,
international trade,
the patenting of life,
the rights of corporations
now defined as people,
government and universities,
the loss of independent
research and science,
anti-trust investigations,
the multibillion dollar
farm bill
and our tax dollars essentially
subsidizing this whole mess,
the future of food and seed,
peak oil, and climate change,
labeling and the right to
know and choose as free people,
but what it all really boiled
down to was one thing.
Why are we doing this
is really the question.
And the answer is very clear
because it is huge money.
In the end, a few companies will
control what the farmer grows
and what you have in your plate.
One of the things we've learned
in the last five years
is that we can have seemingly
powerful institutions
that turn out to be extremely
vulnerable and brittle.
Our banks in the financial
collapse were too big to fail.
OK. Well, our energy system
and our agricultural system
are just as top heavy
and just as vulnerable.
And what that means is
not as with the banks
that we should like,
bail them out
because they're too big to fail.
too big to fail is too big
and we need to build
down this system,
spread it out,
make it more stable,
and I think that's the key.
We do not know the effect
of this grand experiment
that is being vested
upon humanity
by the purveyors of genetically
modified organisms.
If, in fact, we are what we eat,
then we certainly
should be mindful of
the nature of the products
were are consuming
so we know what we will become.
The sun just went
behind the clouds
There's darkness
all around me now
I've just destroyed the
world I'm livin' in
I broke her heart
so many times
And now I've finally
broken mine
And I've just destroyed
the world I'm livin' in
What made me think that
I could go on hurtin' her
I should have known
there had to be an end
But schools of love
are taught by fate
We never learn
till it's too late
And I've just destroyed
the world I'm livin' in
I was worn out and overwhelmed
and needed to get away
from everything for a while.
So, I took my family to one of
in the Sequoia National Forest.
Is there anything sacred left?
Will they genetically modify
these ancient giants
to grow faster so we can
harvest more wood?
There are nearly a hundred new
GMO vegetables and fruit
in the pipeline waiting
to be released.
GMO eucalyptus trees
There are glow in the dark
rabbits and cats,
spermicidal corn,
goats that lactate
spider silk protein,
salmon that grow
four times faster,
and thousands of other
science experiments
mostly for profit.
Even human genes,
thousands of them in
have been patented by
companies and universities.
Are there any limits
to what we will do,
Translation
Translate and read this script in other languages:
Select another language:
- - Select -
- 简体中文 (Chinese - Simplified)
- 繁體中文 (Chinese - Traditional)
- Español (Spanish)
- Esperanto (Esperanto)
- 日本語 (Japanese)
- Português (Portuguese)
- Deutsch (German)
- العربية (Arabic)
- Français (French)
- Русский (Russian)
- ಕನ್ನಡ (Kannada)
- 한국어 (Korean)
- עברית (Hebrew)
- Gaeilge (Irish)
- Українська (Ukrainian)
- اردو (Urdu)
- Magyar (Hungarian)
- मानक हिन्दी (Hindi)
- Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Italiano (Italian)
- தமிழ் (Tamil)
- Türkçe (Turkish)
- తెలుగు (Telugu)
- ภาษาไทย (Thai)
- Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
- Čeština (Czech)
- Polski (Polish)
- Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Românește (Romanian)
- Nederlands (Dutch)
- Ελληνικά (Greek)
- Latinum (Latin)
- Svenska (Swedish)
- Dansk (Danish)
- Suomi (Finnish)
- فارسی (Persian)
- ייִדיש (Yiddish)
- հայերեն (Armenian)
- Norsk (Norwegian)
- English (English)
Citation
Use the citation below to add this screenplay to your bibliography:
Style:MLAChicagoAPA
"GMO OMG" Scripts.com. STANDS4 LLC, 2024. Web. 22 Nov. 2024. <https://www.scripts.com/script/gmo_omg_9044>.
Discuss this script with the community:
Report Comment
We're doing our best to make sure our content is useful, accurate and safe.
If by any chance you spot an inappropriate comment while navigating through our website please use this form to let us know, and we'll take care of it shortly.
Attachment
You need to be logged in to favorite.
Log In