Inequality for All Page #8
that paid as low a tax rate.
The taxation system
and away from the middle class
in the last ten years.
It is dramatic, and I don't
think it's appreciated.
What's the effective rate
I've been paying?
Well, it's probably closer
to the 15% rate than anything.
Mr. Romney's income taxes
were finally posted,
and he paid 13.9%.
Nancy and I paid 33% or more.
It was in the 30s,
and I find that atrocious.
I paid 11% last year
on an eight-figure income.
- Wowzers.
- So less than Mitt Romney.
When you give rich
businesspeople tax breaks
all in the name of job creation,
all that really happens
is that the fat cats get fatter.
And, of course,
that's what's happened
over the last 30 years.
That's the signature feature
of the economy
over the last 30 years.
Look, nobody wants
to pay taxes.
But taxes are the price we pay
to finance the kinds of things
that we can't do individually,
that we need to do together.
There's kind of a negative
trickle-down effect,
and it starts in Washington.
I mean, if the wealthy
are not paying their fair share
and if the middle class
are basically stagnant
and are not paying much
in taxes
because they're not making
much money,
then you're gonna have
a budget crisis
somewhere along the line.
That means less revenue sharing
with the states.
That means the states
have to pull in their belts.
They cannot support
public higher education.
As state funding to institutions
of higher education went down,
tuitions went up to compensate.
I mean, at Berkeley,
where I teach,
in the 1960s, tuition was free.
In the 1970s,
it was $700 a year
in today's dollars.
But now it costs $15,000
for in-state residents.
Next week, members of Congress
are gonna have a chance to vote
on what we call
the Buffett Rule,
and it's simple.
If you make more money...
more than $1 million a year,
not if you have $1 million
but if you make more
than $1 million a year,
you should pay
at least the same percentage
of your income in taxes
as middle-class families do.
He is killing the economy,
and this is class warfare.
I think Barack Obama
is a socialist.
It'll only be a minimum tax
on people who make
lots of money.
More class warfare
from an affable billionaire.
Is he completely a socialist?
Is Warren Buffett a socialist?
You really have no clue
what socialism is, do you?
CEOs and Wall Street
have been doing terribly...
you know, enormously well.
Why should they get
continued tax cuts
when, in fact, we have a huge
deficit way down the line?
- Robert Reich.
- You know Robert Reich?
- I do indeed.
- He's a Communist.
- You know that, right?
- Communist/socialist.
- Okay.
- Confused. He's a confused.
The guy secretly adores
Karl Marx
and is up there in Cambridge...
Can I just be clear about this?
I am not, nor have I ever been,
a member of the Communist Party
or a Communist.
A lot of people are
watching Fox, and I like Fox.
I like appearing with you,
and I like you personally.
I used to be on O'Reilly's show.
In fact, I even substituted
for Bill O'Reilly
a couple of times.
He asked me.
I was on Fox quite a lot.
Joining us now
our good friend Robert Reich.
Secretary, how are you,
my friend?
Good see you.
But no longer.
They don't ask.
The football field
of American politics
has kept on shifting
to the right.
I just... you know,
basically I just stand here.
I've watched it move.
I used to be
something of a centrist.
In fact, my first job
was in the Ford administration.
Hello.
That's a Republican
administration.
You know, were considered
conservative in the 1990s.
Yeah.
majority leader of the Senate.
I could have been king.
Our staffs
were not terribly happy
that we were getting together.
My staff said, "Don't have lunch
with this right-winger."
- From Wyoming.
- From Wyoming.
"There's nothing in it."
We were approached
about doing a show.
Mmhmm.
- Hello, Robert.
- Good to see you again.
- Good evening.
- Yeah, here.
Oh, thank you so much.
You're now considered
a moderate,
if not lefty.
- Commie.
- What happened?
They came in,
and they brought with them
an antigovernment hatred.
And you don't have adversaries
anymore.
You have enemies.
There does seem to be
a strong correlation
between political polarization
on the one hand
and widening
economic inequality.
Researchers measured
the distance
between the median
voting patterns
of one party
and the other party,
and what they found is that
in times of high inequality,
you have the highest degree
of polarization.
It almost tracks exactly.
You see how totally integrated
and connected
the issue of inequality is
to our democracy.
And you see how the ultimate
guardians of our democracy...
if Congress doesn't do it
and if the executive
doesn't do it,
the ultimate guardians
are up here.
In 2010, the Supreme Court
in Citizens United
decided that corporations
are people.
And as Citizens United
was interpreted by lower courts,
it basically said
that corporations,
wealthy individuals,
anybody who has a lot of money,
can flood the political system,
can basically inundate
our democracy
with their money.
Mr. Wertheimer?
- Robert, how are you?
- How are you?
The idea that a corporation
could spend $1 billion
in an election
to elect a president
and it would not have
the capacity
to have a corrupting influence
over government decisions...
- That's absurd.
- I mean...
Is a concept
from another planet.
The money isn't new.
The quantity of the money
is new.
In the last
presidential election,
we saw for the first time
in this country
billionaires...
I mean,
a handful of billionaires...
contributing huge sums of money
to individual candidates,
basically keeping
those candidates going.
I mean, is this America?
Not in my mind.
I think
it's absolutely stupefying.
I think, if you keep going,
in the next presidential
election,
it will be, "Have you got
$300 million in your pocket?
'Cause you can buy a president."
There are liberal billionaires.
There are conservative
billionaires.
So if you see someone
buying a result that you like,
someone else can buy a result
that you're gonna hate
if they can give
a huge amount of money.
You cannot have government
on the auction block.
When we see the contrast
between the values we share
and the realities we live in,
that is the fundamental
foundation for social change.
You work for us!
You work for us!
The Tea Party movement
was born in the wake
of the Wall Street bailout.
We want to make sure
that the government
is doing what's right
for all people,
not just for some of the people.
An everyday Tea Partier
is an American citizen
that is frustrated
with the direction
the country's going.
We got sold out.
The Occupy movement
Translation
Translate and read this script in other languages:
Select another language:
- - Select -
- 简体中文 (Chinese - Simplified)
- 繁體中文 (Chinese - Traditional)
- Español (Spanish)
- Esperanto (Esperanto)
- 日本語 (Japanese)
- Português (Portuguese)
- Deutsch (German)
- العربية (Arabic)
- Français (French)
- Русский (Russian)
- ಕನ್ನಡ (Kannada)
- 한국어 (Korean)
- עברית (Hebrew)
- Gaeilge (Irish)
- Українська (Ukrainian)
- اردو (Urdu)
- Magyar (Hungarian)
- मानक हिन्दी (Hindi)
- Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Italiano (Italian)
- தமிழ் (Tamil)
- Türkçe (Turkish)
- తెలుగు (Telugu)
- ภาษาไทย (Thai)
- Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
- Čeština (Czech)
- Polski (Polish)
- Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Românește (Romanian)
- Nederlands (Dutch)
- Ελληνικά (Greek)
- Latinum (Latin)
- Svenska (Swedish)
- Dansk (Danish)
- Suomi (Finnish)
- فارسی (Persian)
- ייִדיש (Yiddish)
- հայերեն (Armenian)
- Norsk (Norwegian)
- English (English)
Citation
Use the citation below to add this screenplay to your bibliography:
Style:MLAChicagoAPA
"Inequality for All" Scripts.com. STANDS4 LLC, 2024. Web. 23 Dec. 2024. <https://www.scripts.com/script/inequality_for_all_10812>.
Discuss this script with the community:
Report Comment
We're doing our best to make sure our content is useful, accurate and safe.
If by any chance you spot an inappropriate comment while navigating through our website please use this form to let us know, and we'll take care of it shortly.
Attachment
You need to be logged in to favorite.
Log In