Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined Page #3

---

and I don't know

the context of how it

came up in his speech

last night in New York

said that China must be a part

of the New World Order.

I guess I would like to

ask you how you envision

China fitting in to the New World Order.

It is a country that we are going to

have relationships with by virtue

of its geopolitical importance.

American officials say breaking

down regional and national barriers

to the flow of goods and services

would represent a spectacular

benefit to economies around the world.

We are building a New World Order.

Bush would actually make

a commencement address

at Maxwell Air Force Base

declaring the birth of this Order.

And that's why I wanted

to speak to you today

about the new world

taking shape around us,

about the prospects for a New

World Order now within our reach.

In the coming weeks,

I'll be talking in some detail about

the possibility of a New World

Order emerging after the Cold War,

but today I want to discuss

another aspect of that Order.

You see, as the Cold War drew to an end,

we saw the possibilities of a New Order

in which nations work together.

It refers to new ways of working

with other nations to deter aggression

and to achieve stability.

As old threats recede, new threats emerge.

The quest for the New World Order

is in part a challenge to keep

the dangers of disorder at bay.

We must build on the

successes of Desert Storm

to give new shape and momentum

to this New World Order.

Only when this transformation is complete

will we be able to take full measure

of the opportunities presented

by this new and involving World Order.

The New World Order really

is a tool for addressing

a new world of possibilities.

This Order gains its mission and shape,

not just from shared interests,

but from sheared ideals.

After the Gulf War had ended,

Bush was so obsessed with

the idea of a New World Order,

that he had a series of

Glocks imprinted with the term

that he would give to

members of his administration,

including Colin Powell, Brent Scowcroft,

Dick Cheney and General

Norman Schwarzkopf.

Cheney would even approve policy

papers regarding the New World Order.

Defense Secretary Dick Cheney

has approved a revised draft

of a policy document

on the New World Order.

The Pentagon is backing off

a controversial earlier draft

and has abandoned a

one-superpower strategy.

The final document puts more emphasis

on international alliances

and organizations.

This would become an

unprecedented time period

for people all over the

globe to discuss at length

what the New World Order meant to them.

People within the media:

Does anybody want to talk

about the New World Order?

Is there a New World Order

out there or is this a,

a vision that exists in the...

He does have his vision;

there's no doubt about that.

But does that exist

in the President's mind

or does it exist out there in reality.

This President sees this

episode as the first test case,

as the first example for the New

World Order he is trying to organize.

Some people have called

it the New World Disorder

and there's a lot of truth to that.

University and Institutional Chairs

I mean, we're talking a New

World Order at Georgetown,

and we'd like to very much be a

part of it and continue to live.

This is a world that that is likely

to be dominated in the near future,

and perhaps longer, by the Gulf

War and the New World Order,

which is the buzzword of the moment.

So the secret of a New World Order...

and at this point it's just a slogan

but it does have some

historical background

in terms that orders have

succeeded each other over time

the secret of this is to learn

how to use coalitions.

We are effective in the United Nations.

People within Government

George Bush has invoked a New World Order

without enunciating a

new American purpose.

The President has still failed

to articulate clear goals

for our nation's foreign

policy in this new age.

I find the term New World

Order very revolting,

and not only historically

but politically today.

I think Hodding is absolutely

right and the actions

of the administration just after

annunciation of the New World Order

put the lie to the fact

there is any real substance

behind what they say is New World Order.

The first act of the New

World Order was a.) to make war

and then b.) was to

sell arms all over again.

Is there a New World Order?

We know certainly that George Bush has

copyrighted the term at this point.

In the aftermath of this war

though, is it an empty vessel

into which something will be poured?

Is it the appropriate term to use?

Is it going to be a New World Order

or will disorder be just as significant

in this process as we look ahead;

and let's start with Madeleine.

I think that we have, in fact,

kind of had this term thrown at us

and many of us have not liked it,

partially because of the

previous historical connotation

and partially because I think it doesn't

really deal with the way the world

ought to be or is at the moment.

But we are far from seeing a World Order

and I'm not sure that it is

in best U.S. interest to have

a New World Order in

which we are the policemen.

While many began to become

critical of this Order,

the term began to evaporate

into the background.

We are very, very skeptical

of an international order

if we are not sure how the rules

will be made, because thus far,

the international order has been made

with rules that we had no

input into and that affect us;

and even when on the few occasions

when the rules will seem to favor us,

then they get changed.

A unipolar world, a

world of one superpower,

may be quite dangerous for us.

A New World Order under the

United Nations would mean,

among other things, an end of our God

- given rights,

given us and secured by the Constitution.

The New World Order which now has,

has been called by some

the New World Disorder

and by some people of a

more liberal persuasion

the taking over of the world by

the Council on Foreign Relations,

the Trilateral Commission and the

U.N., to put us all in slavery.

But what are these organizations?

Who founded them and what

are the stated goals of each?

Before we begin with the

Council on Foreign Relations,

let's delve further into history

to understand round table

groups and their origins.

Its roots go way, way back in history.

And they go back to the

formation of a secret society,

a secret organization that

was created by Cecil Rhodes,

a very powerful and

very wealthy individual.

And people have heard about him in history

and they know about the Rhodes Scholarship

and they think, Well, isn't that nice?

But they don't understand

at all what that's all about.

Cecil Rhodes, when he

died, left his great fortune

not to his family, not to his heirs,

but for the creation of a secret society.

And we know about this because

there were some people

Rate this script:0.0 / 0 votes