Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined Page #7

---

And we're following this breaking story.

Candy Crowley, we understand

has new information.

Candy, what have you learned?

We are hearing, actually, from

Chris Welch who is our embed

with the Obama campaign... those

are the people that took off

without Obama and went to Chicago.

The spokesman there is, in

fact, confirming that the meeting

did take place. They're

talking in past tense now,

but saying that the meeting did not

take place at the Clinton's house.

It took place at, at this point

at some place, I don't know where;

some undisclosed place in Washington, DC,

not at Hilary Clinton's house.

Remember Gibbs mentioned that Obama

had a desire to have several

meetings, not just one.

Is there more than one meeting?

Is there more than one

person with whom he...

I'm not gonna get into all

the details of the meetings.

I don't know that I've got a ton more

different answers

for all of your questions.

The truth of the matter is that Bilderberg

just happened to be in the

neighborhood at the time.

They were holding their annual

meeting just down the road

in Chantilly, Virginia.

What are the chances?

What's interesting and dangerous

about the New World Order

is that it's not a natural

progressing idea.

It's just not civilization naturally

evolving and organizing into this system.

It's the group of extremely powerful

people that are manipulating the system

to get it to this status from behind

the scenes without anybody's knowledge.

You have to ask yourself: if

there isn't an agenda going on

to keep those organizations quiet

and to keep them out of the news,

to keep the discussions about

them behind closed doors,

then why is it that

these supposed experts,

on the left and on the

right, never talk about them.

This has been a condensed history of

the globalist organizations

and their rise to power.

But is there a reason they

meet behind closed doors?

A shadow world government

had been mentioned,

but to truly understand what that means,

let's go back to this iconic warning

from President Dwight D. Eisenhower.

Progress toward these noble

goals is persistently threatened

by the conflict now engulfing the world.

It commands our whole attention,

absorbs our very beings.

We face a hostile ideology, global

in scope, atheistic in character,

ruthless in purpose

and insidious in method.

Unhappily, the danger it poses

promises to be of indefinite duration.

The need to maintain balance

in and among national programs,

balance between the private

and the public economy,

balance between the cost

and hoped-for advantages,

balance between the clearly necessary

and the comfortably desirable.

We have been compelled to create

a permanent armaments industry

of vast proportions.

We annually spend on

military security alone

more than the net income of

all United States corporations.

The total influence... economic,

political, even spiritual...

is felt in every city, every State House,

every office of the Federal Government.

Yet we must not fail to

comprehend its grave implications.

Our toil, resources, and

livelihood are all involved;

so is the very structure of our society.

In the councils of government,

we must guard against

the acquisition of unwarranted influence,

whether sought or unsought, by

the military-industrial complex.

The potential for the disastrous

rise of misplaced power

exists and will persist.

America went into a major mobilization,

revived its defense industries,

and we saw the civilian economy of America

more and more skewed through the '50s.

Already in Eisenhower's

time he could see it coming

that you were getting a larger and larger

defense-military component of the economy

which, unlike the rest of the economy,

was very, very centrally

organized about lobbying

for more and more new weapons.

It was the political skills of

this military-industrial complex

which I think Eisenhower was really

warning us about, and rightly.

There is a military-industrial complex.

Today we see a situation where the

civilian economy is really in tatters

and most of our civilian production is

gone overseas to third world countries.

What do we export? Our biggest

export, practically, is garbage,

but apart from garbage we

export military equipment.

We have a special Act which subsidizes,

makes it possible for countries

abroad to buy our armaments

because it's too expensive to

produce them for one country only.

So we have become a very efficient

military-industrial complex but

the civilian economy is only a ghost

of what it used to be and this has

terrible consequences for democracy

because it means that the power

of this lobby is now sort of

dominating what goes on in Washington.

Through multi-national corporations,

global intelligence networks,

out of control banksters,

all under the veil of national

security and black operations,

the global elite have consolidated power

on a massive scale over

the last several decades.

You see, global corporations

not only fund and develop

large technological and military

projects here and abroad,

they also own the consumer

industry and production,

as well as all of the important media.

By owning the vast majority of what

we hear and see on a daily basis,

we have been manipulated on a mass scale,

as to regards to what we believe and

desire, both socially and politically.

Edward Bernays, the nephew of world

famous psychoanalyst Sigmund Freud,

would study group dynamics and

become the father of public relations.

He authored the book Propaganda in 1928.

In it, he described how to

intelligently and consciously

manipulate the habits and opinions

of the masses within a democratic society.

He went on to state that those who

harness this unseen mechanism of society

constitute an invisible government

and are the true ruling power.

It is they who pull the wires

which control the public mind,

who harness old social forces

and contrive new ways to

bind and guide the world.

The average American

is distracted, mindless,

worried about minuscule things,

celebrities, as if it was

their own family members.

And this is by design

because The Powers That Be,

who own the media, know

how our brains work.

They know scientifically

how the human mind functions,

they know about sociology,

and they are using the media

and have used the media for decades now,

to entertain people with

issues that don't really matter.

When you have the big news

networks covering celebrity issues

as if it's the most important thing,

it becomes the most important thing.

And this is not by accident;

this is to keep us out of the way.

Because if you're worried

about the latest celebrity death

or the latest celebrity couple,

or the celebrity brake-up,

or your sports team having a shot

at the Superbowl or the World Series,

there's so much information about

those issues that can be discussed

that will mesmerize

people and they won't know

Rate this script:0.0 / 0 votes