Judgment at Nuremberg Page #2
- NOT RATED
- Year:
- 1961
- 186 min
- 4,015 Views
before this tribunal?
I am represented.
How do you plead? Guilty or not guilty?
You may be seated.
Werner Lammpe?
Are you represented by counsel
before this tribunal?
Counsel?
Yes, of course. I am represented.
How do you plead to the charges?
Guilty or not guilty?
You may be seated.
Ernst Janning?
Are you represented by counsel
before this tribunal?
Are you represented by counsel
before this tribunal?
I represent the defendant, Your Honor.
How do you plead to the charges
and specifications set forth...
in the indictment against you?
Guilty or not guilty?
Your Honor, may I address the court?
The defendant does not recognize
the authority of this tribunal...
and wishes to lodge a formal protest
in lieu of pleading.
A plea of "not guilty" will be entered.
The prosecution
will begin its opening address.
Slow and easy, Junior.
The case is unusual...
in that the defendants
are charged with crimes...
committed in the name of the law.
These men, together with their deceased
or fugitive colleagues...
are the embodiment of what passed
for justice during the Third Reich.
The defendants served as judges
during the period of the Third Reich.
Therefore, you, Your Honors,
as judges on the bench...
will be sitting in judgment...
of judges in the dock.
And this is as it should be.
For only a judge knows
how much more a court is than a courtroom.
It is a process and a spirit.
It is the house of law.
The defendants knew this, too.
They knew courtrooms well.
They sat in their black robes...
and they distorted, they perverted,
they destroyed justice and law in Germany.
Will the prosecution please watch the light?
- The interpreter cannot follow you.
- I'm sorry, Your Honor.
They distorted, they perverted...
they destroyed justice and law in Germany.
Now, this in itself
is undoubtedly a great crime.
But the prosecution
is not calling the defendants...
to account for violating
constitutional guarantees...
or withholding due process of law.
The prosecution
is calling them to account...
for murder...
brutalities...
torture...
atrocities.
They share with all the leaders
of the Third Reich...
responsibility for the most malignant,
the most calculated...
the most devastating crimes
in the history of all mankind.
And they are perhaps more guilty
than some of the others.
For they had attained maturity
long before Hitler's rise to power.
Their minds weren't warped at an early age
by Nazi teachings.
They embraced the ideologies
of the Third Reich as educated adults...
when they, most of all...
should have valued justice.
Here they'll receive the justice
they denied others.
They'll be judged according to the evidence
presented in this courtroom.
The prosecution asks nothing more.
Herr Rolfe will make the opening statement
for the defense.
May it please the tribunal...
it is not only a great honor...
but also a great challenge...
for an advocate...
to aid this tribunal in its task.
The entire civilized world...
will follow closely what we do here.
For this is not an ordinary trial...
by any means
of the accepted, parochial sense.
The avowed purpose of this tribunal...
Is broader than the visiting of retribution
on a few men.
It is dedicated to the reconsecration...
of the temple of justice.
It is dedicated to finding a code of justice...
the whole world will be responsible to.
How will this code be established?
It will be established...
in a clear...
honest evaluation...
of the responsibility for the crimes
in the indictment stated by the prosecution.
In the words of the great American jurist,
Oliver Wendell Holmes:
"This responsibility will not be found
only in documents...
"that no one contests or denies.
"It will be found in considerations
of a political or social nature.
"It will be found, most of all...
"in the character of men."
What is the character of Ernst Janning?
Let us examine his life for a moment.
He was born in .
Received the degree
of Doctor of Law in .
Became a judge in East Prussia in .
Following WWI, he became one
of the leaders of the Weimar Republic...
and was one of the framers
of its democratic constitution.
In subsequent years
Translation
Translate and read this script in other languages:
Select another language:
- - Select -
- 简体中文 (Chinese - Simplified)
- 繁體中文 (Chinese - Traditional)
- Español (Spanish)
- Esperanto (Esperanto)
- 日本語 (Japanese)
- Português (Portuguese)
- Deutsch (German)
- العربية (Arabic)
- Français (French)
- Русский (Russian)
- ಕನ್ನಡ (Kannada)
- 한국어 (Korean)
- עברית (Hebrew)
- Gaeilge (Irish)
- Українська (Ukrainian)
- اردو (Urdu)
- Magyar (Hungarian)
- मानक हिन्दी (Hindi)
- Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Italiano (Italian)
- தமிழ் (Tamil)
- Türkçe (Turkish)
- తెలుగు (Telugu)
- ภาษาไทย (Thai)
- Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
- Čeština (Czech)
- Polski (Polish)
- Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Românește (Romanian)
- Nederlands (Dutch)
- Ελληνικά (Greek)
- Latinum (Latin)
- Svenska (Swedish)
- Dansk (Danish)
- Suomi (Finnish)
- فارسی (Persian)
- ייִדיש (Yiddish)
- հայերեն (Armenian)
- Norsk (Norwegian)
- English (English)
Citation
Use the citation below to add this screenplay to your bibliography:
Style:MLAChicagoAPA
"Judgment at Nuremberg" Scripts.com. STANDS4 LLC, 2024. Web. 22 Dec. 2024. <https://www.scripts.com/script/judgment_at_nuremberg_210>.
Discuss this script with the community:
Report Comment
We're doing our best to make sure our content is useful, accurate and safe.
If by any chance you spot an inappropriate comment while navigating through our website please use this form to let us know, and we'll take care of it shortly.
Attachment
You need to be logged in to favorite.
Log In