Life of Python Page #2
- Year:
- 1990
- 57 min
- 39 Views
Which nobody saw at all,
was a series Terry
Jones and I wrote.
The whole essence of the
complete and utter histories
was to look at history
As if television
had existed at the time,
so we were reporting
on historical events
as if it was modern television.
There'd be an interview
with the victorious Normans
in the showers after
the Battle of Hastings.
"Boys, how did it go?"
When were you sure
you were going to win?
You can never be sure
of a thing like that,
when they were 2,000 down.
Great fun, these lads.
Well, now what about that incident?
You mean when Harold was knocked down.
Very nasty business, David,
but I think it was fair.
Certainly gave our lads a laugh.
That was the good bit.
in what must have been April of 1969,
and he said,
"Oh, I've seen The Complete
And Utter History."
He said, "Um,
"you won't be doing any
more of those, will you,
So why don't we do
something together?"
Meaning your lot and our lot.
Barry took, who was
then, you know,
and still is a highly
respected writer
who had worked with
Marty and all that,
was acting as a sort of
entrepreneur of comedy
at the time.
In 1969, I was the advisor
to the comedy department at the BBC,
And we'd just finished
a very successful
second series of Marty,
starring Marty Feldman.
The BBC asked me, "What comes next?"
I'd been looking around
at the various people
who were extremely good
writer-performers.
There were a lot of them,
and I, in my mind's eye,
which subsequently became six.
They were John Cleese
and Graham Chapman,
Michael Palin and Terry Jones,
Eric Idle and Terry Gilliam.
When you look back,
it was an amazing act of courage.
I was the only one who'd been
much on as a performer,
except that the others--
Mike, Terry, and Eric,
and Terry Gilliam's
first animation--
first appeared on
Do Not Adjust Your Set,
but nobody knew that.
It was the funniest
thing on television,
but it went out at half past 4:00.
It was extraordinary they
went straight into a series
without asking for a pilot.
I thank them for that.
They used to meet and
argue first at my home,
then go to their homes,
then through the evening
they'd phone me and say,
"Am I ruining my career
"by being a part
of this new thing?"
Nobody knew what to call it.
The first title was "It's".
We thought the idea of
somebody saying "It's"
And then being immediately cut off
before they could
announce the program
was funny.
It's...
The BBC said, "Why don't
you just have something
really wacky or
off the wall like...
like somebody's flying circus?
how about that,
John Cleese's flying circus
or something like that?"
John, commendably, didn't
want to be associated
that closely with the show.
And it wasn't any one person's show.
That was something we didn't want--
the John Cleese Show.
We merged our identities
as much as possible.
John suggested Python,
and I suggested Monty
'cause in my pub in Warwickshire,
there was this guy wore a bow tie.
Monty was the guy--
slightly overweight,
was always there in his corner
and had his own pint mug.
It was this wonderful,
warming sort of name.
shows, the early ones.
The first one was called
Whither Canada?
A silly send up of a
documentary subtitle.
Sex And Violence-- we liked that.
The BBC said, "We hope there
won't be any sex and violence."
Weren't we naughty?
Gosh, we were naughty boys.
Aah!
Monty Python's Flying Circus.
It was important to us
to have control
because even when we'd been
writing for other people
and had become well-
established writers,
artists would change a line.
Producers would change a line.
"We think this is better."
We'd say, "No, it isn't."
They might have been right,
but we wanted to say we do know.
The six of us know what is right.
We started off
having group meetings.
We'd meet and talk about
what we wanted to do,
what we should avoid,
The shape of the show--
Get based, then a Gilliam cartoon--
It would go through and link and flow,
and it wouldn't have stop-starts.
Terry Gilliam had done this
stream animation of consciousness.
It was definitely a conscious idea
that was a stream
of consciousness.
All the kids really wanted to hear
was that we were heavily into drugs.
Nothing else interested them.
We were all by then pushing 30.
We'd all been working
for a very long time
and were disciplined,
hard-working guys
doing a terrible, boring business
of trying to make people laugh.
They would be terribly,
bitterly disappointed
that we're not sort of--
"Hey, wow, let's do this.
Let's do that."
You can't get a knight in armor
and a chicken just like that.
You've got to plan it.
we stuck to our own usual
writing groupings--
Terry Jones and myself,
Eric Idle writing on his own,
Terry Gilliam doing
his animations on his own,
And John and Graham writing together.
Graham is a very, very clever writer
and the best judge
of whether something's funny
that I've ever come across.
If ever I was not sure,
I would always take
Graham's opinion.
He seemed to be a sort
of perfect litmus paper
with just extraordinary judgment.
And that was unbelievably
valuable, I think,
to the group and to me as a writer.
John always has to
write through someone.
ideas through someone.
The Graham-John partnership
worked extremely well
'cause Graham was always
able to throw in
this really bizarre...
Now and again he'd say "Mongoose,"
which would set the whole thing
careering off in another direction.
Funny that penguin being there.
What's it doing there?
Standing.
I can see that.
Perhaps it comes from next door.
Penguins don't come
from next door.
They come from the Antarctic.
Burma!
Why did you say "Burma"?
I panicked.
The "Nudge-nudge" sketch,
I'd actually written
for Ronnie Barker
for a Frost On Sunday.
I thought it was
a funny character.
It was only afterwards I realized
why he never did it.
Because the script says,
"Know what I mean?
Know what I mean?
Nudge nudge. Say no more.
Know what I mean?"
There's no jokes in it or anything.
I read it out very tentatively
at one of the early Python meetings,
and they laughed like
crazy at the character.
Is your wife, uh, a goer?
Know what I mean?
Nudge nudge. Nudge nudge.
Know what I mean?
I beg your pardon?
Your wife, does she...
Does she go?
Know what I mean?
Nudge nudge. Say no more.
She sometimes goes, yes.
I'll bet she does.
Know what I mean? Nudge nudge.
I don't quite follow you.
Oh, follow me. That's good.
A nod's as good as a wink
to a blind bat, eh?
Are you selling something?
Selling? Selling? Very good.
Very good.
Oh, wicked! Wicked! You're wicked.
Know what I mean? Nudge nudge.
Know what I mean? Nudge nudge.
Nudge nudge.
Translation
Translate and read this script in other languages:
Select another language:
- - Select -
- 简体中文 (Chinese - Simplified)
- 繁體中文 (Chinese - Traditional)
- Español (Spanish)
- Esperanto (Esperanto)
- 日本語 (Japanese)
- Português (Portuguese)
- Deutsch (German)
- العربية (Arabic)
- Français (French)
- Русский (Russian)
- ಕನ್ನಡ (Kannada)
- 한국어 (Korean)
- עברית (Hebrew)
- Gaeilge (Irish)
- Українська (Ukrainian)
- اردو (Urdu)
- Magyar (Hungarian)
- मानक हिन्दी (Hindi)
- Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Italiano (Italian)
- தமிழ் (Tamil)
- Türkçe (Turkish)
- తెలుగు (Telugu)
- ภาษาไทย (Thai)
- Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
- Čeština (Czech)
- Polski (Polish)
- Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Românește (Romanian)
- Nederlands (Dutch)
- Ελληνικά (Greek)
- Latinum (Latin)
- Svenska (Swedish)
- Dansk (Danish)
- Suomi (Finnish)
- فارسی (Persian)
- ייִדיש (Yiddish)
- հայերեն (Armenian)
- Norsk (Norwegian)
- English (English)
Citation
Use the citation below to add this screenplay to your bibliography:
Style:MLAChicagoAPA
"Life of Python" Scripts.com. STANDS4 LLC, 2024. Web. 22 Dec. 2024. <https://www.scripts.com/script/life_of_python_12558>.
Discuss this script with the community:
Report Comment
We're doing our best to make sure our content is useful, accurate and safe.
If by any chance you spot an inappropriate comment while navigating through our website please use this form to let us know, and we'll take care of it shortly.
Attachment
You need to be logged in to favorite.
Log In