Lions For Lambs Page #3

Synopsis: Three stories told simultaneous in ninety minutes of real time: a Republican Senator who's a presidential hopeful gives an hour-long interview to a skeptical television reporter, detailing a strategy for victory in Afghanistan; two special forces ambushed on an Afghani ridge await rescue as Taliban forces close in; a poli-sci professor at a California college invites a promising student to re-engage. Decisions press upon the reporter, the student, and the soldiers.
Genre: Drama, Thriller, War
Director(s): Robert Redford
Production: MGM
  3 nominations.
 
IMDB:
6.2
Metacritic:
47
Rotten Tomatoes:
27%
R
Year:
2007
92 min
$14,971,658
Website
928 Views


Did it demonstrate it to him in their classes?

Yes.

You always showed it, you involved yourself.

You made all that sent.

You were hungry, you requested those classes, you had

that to emit your trial in any debate.

Now, the question

here es:
Por how no longer?

I already responded that, Mister.

Many things. Small, the

fraternity, to socialize...

He/she hears, Tod, we go.

Not I want to hurt their feelings.

He/she hears,

we have one hour, don't lose a

second worried by my feelings.

Not I am worried by yours.

Thank you, it has taken out all my letters.

Of agreement, we go.

It is well.

The Political Sciences, doc.

What is there of scientific in that?

Maybe in the psychology that

it is necessary to know all sh*t...

... it is spoken without they notice it.

So this part, really

alone they worry about how to win.

Not another thing, not how to make him/her

well to somebody, alone how to win.

Not it cares how stupid, or

how criminal you have to be...

Give me an example.

Of agreement, the one

president Kennedy is one.

He/she announced their candidacy stopping

before a great audience...

... and saying in high voice

that he/she didn't want to be a president.

Does he/she know?

- Yes.

- Yes, what is that sh*t?

That is last time.

No, I don't believe it.

Of agreement, you had me when

we studied the old philosophers.

The Greek.

Doc, you caught me,

they were astonishing.

In some place...

... I got lost, I don't know it.

At some time you have been in Greece?

- No.

- No, of course that not.

You only worry about others that had

a rationalized version of the future.

That was not my point.

Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, they could

to solve problems in a very easy way.

How, abandoning?

I have to pay my taxes, I will have

that to pay the lights of the traffic...

He/she was thinking of something bigger.

How what? To be a congress member?

- That is bigger.

- Oh, yes.

Super, and later I will give those trips

to the AD and I will be part of that sh*t.

Those that make our laws,

I will have to be a puppet,

that they comb themselves all of the same side.

The type that he/she never says anything.

You know that I am never quiet.

It could be the type that him

of lessons of morality,

while they happen to me papers for

under the table, oh yes, please.

The type that uses 1 million of

dollars that don't belong him/her and...

... they are never discovered.

How many they are never captured.

If that is something bigger than to be

a good man with a good work,

I take it.

Yes, it is for that reason that I lost.

Almost you convince me.

Almost you convince me.

What?

You really know of

what you are speaking?

You are brilliant with the words,

but, do you know that he/she would make you better?

That you involved yourself.

If they are confronted in

any type of experience.

If you are not behind the doors,

making a damned meeting,

Alone you put on in the line of

any not well this thing.

Confronting me, that is

to put on in the mean, not?

You would make more than only speaking.

Ernie?

Brother.

The left part,

it is hot.

Not we should have left

to our parachutes.

The pilots?

They have been on board baleados and

they didn't land where they would should.

Where did they land?

We think that they are in the plateau.

The troops are not well,

two lost men.

Lost?

Be in charge of of that, who does it lack?

Vinch and Rodrguez.

According to the informations, they should be

in a small place of flat LZ.

They are not known if they can have survived.

Ernie?

Brother.

Jodido idiot.

How wrong are you?

He/she hears, indicate me.

I am begun.

He/she hears, he/she is Jim.

It tolerates.

How much does it delay the rescue troop?

They are here, but they have to make

a perimeter to make us know,

We won't put them in the same situation.

Put them hidden for

that they tell us that it happens.

Can we control everything?

But I don't know since time, G2 is the one

to be covered by a snowfall that he/she comes at 71mph.

It is about seeing the more than you can

for the possible biggest time.

What you tell me of

to send him/her a sign express?

I am working hard, I sent one ago

- But those...

- Code it.

Make it.

He/she wanted to speak with prostitute's son

that he/she said that this area was sure.

The Afghans cannot train,

the commands are small,

the specialized teams

they established 4 operation points.

I thought that they would be 4 operation bases,

but they are 4 operation points,

a point for if alone it is

smaller than a base.

Because it is it.

What?

I sit down it, not.

Me alone...

That sounds as putting

the bait troops.

Janine, is not as putting 1

or 2 types in the mountains.

Small it is as we decide it.

Alone they are men under those conditions.

This is the war in the

that we are put...

... and unfortunately the civilization

it is not sustained for if alone...

... if there is not an answer violence.

What does that mean? Van to

to drain the diplomatic road?

The State Department...

We will attack.

Not you respond to an attack with diplomacy.

The diplomacy is not made

with the idea of teaching.

new in the UN,

and the UN responded making 30 strong

declarations condemning their behavior.

On the other hand France, China and Russia,

the discussions continue for Sudan.

And we don't arm

also to Sudan in those '80?

But we are here now.

Yes, we are here now and not

you believe that it is imposed to analyze...

... as we arrive to this point.

How and why the matter is not now.

We have to move ahead, we are

fighting against the nickname of evil.

The 1300 years of the human progress they have

been marked by the violence and the death.

Now, if that is something that you not

that should be shown...

I, would like me him to be spoken

of that more than anyone,

but I don't understand how it is that

you don't want to look to the past,

I believe that it is decisive.

What is decisive,

what is outstanding...

... it is the implementation of this new one

strategy that we will make in this war.

A war that we cannot lose.

But we are not winning it.

Still.

This new strategy can change that.

What there is of the strategy

of bringing to the troops to house?

Then veto.

That is not an option.

Of agreement, we go...

to put it this way.

We were...

... to Afghanistan in a

beginning for the talibanes.

Alone that now the talibanes has

made of this a bigger problem...

... because they have given to

to glitter their super powers.

They pushed people that voted for

they, were the sufficiently stupid ones...

... to put their faith in our world.

So to call it now the end of the

it thrills to put an end to the life of...

... 10 millions of Afghan for the one

end of the credibility of America.

The end of America is a force

for the incorrect thing in the world.

- When the Americans... ?

- And when our forces...

... return in a couple of

Rate this script:0.0 / 0 votes

Matthew Michael Carnahan

Matthew Michael Carnahan (sometimes credited as Matt Carnahan) is an American screenwriter who wrote the feature film The Kingdom (2007), and the film adaptation of the hit BBC television drama serial State of Play. Carnahan also wrote the screenplay for Lions for Lambs for United Artists. His brother is Joe Carnahan, who wrote and directed Narc (2002), Smokin' Aces (2006) and The A-Team (2010). More recently, he worked on the screenplay for the zombie film World War Z (2013). He wrote the screenplay for the film adaptation of Nemesis with his brother Joe Carnahan. more…

All Matthew Michael Carnahan scripts | Matthew Michael Carnahan Scripts

0 fans

Submitted on August 05, 2018

Discuss this script with the community:

0 Comments

    Translation

    Translate and read this script in other languages:

    Select another language:

    • - Select -
    • 简体中文 (Chinese - Simplified)
    • 繁體中文 (Chinese - Traditional)
    • Español (Spanish)
    • Esperanto (Esperanto)
    • 日本語 (Japanese)
    • Português (Portuguese)
    • Deutsch (German)
    • العربية (Arabic)
    • Français (French)
    • Русский (Russian)
    • ಕನ್ನಡ (Kannada)
    • 한국어 (Korean)
    • עברית (Hebrew)
    • Gaeilge (Irish)
    • Українська (Ukrainian)
    • اردو (Urdu)
    • Magyar (Hungarian)
    • मानक हिन्दी (Hindi)
    • Indonesia (Indonesian)
    • Italiano (Italian)
    • தமிழ் (Tamil)
    • Türkçe (Turkish)
    • తెలుగు (Telugu)
    • ภาษาไทย (Thai)
    • Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
    • Čeština (Czech)
    • Polski (Polish)
    • Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
    • Românește (Romanian)
    • Nederlands (Dutch)
    • Ελληνικά (Greek)
    • Latinum (Latin)
    • Svenska (Swedish)
    • Dansk (Danish)
    • Suomi (Finnish)
    • فارسی (Persian)
    • ייִדיש (Yiddish)
    • հայերեն (Armenian)
    • Norsk (Norwegian)
    • English (English)

    Citation

    Use the citation below to add this screenplay to your bibliography:

    Style:MLAChicagoAPA

    "Lions For Lambs" Scripts.com. STANDS4 LLC, 2024. Web. 27 Jul 2024. <https://www.scripts.com/script/lions_for_lambs_12621>.

    We need you!

    Help us build the largest writers community and scripts collection on the web!

    Watch the movie trailer

    Lions For Lambs

    Browse Scripts.com

    Lions For Lambs

    Soundtrack

    »

    The Studio:

    ScreenWriting Tool

    Write your screenplay and focus on the story with many helpful features.


    Quiz

    Are you a screenwriting master?

    »
    What is "exposition" in screenwriting?
    A The ending of the story
    B The climax of the story
    C The introduction of background information
    D The dialogue between characters