![Find Madame Curie on Amazon](https://ia.media-imdb.com/images/M/MV5BMjI4NzAwNDUwNl5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwMTA1MjkyMTE@._V1_SX300.jpg)
Madame Curie Page #6
- NOT RATED
- Year:
- 1943
- 124 min
- 780 Views
Yes, I'm positive, Pierre.
And you found that
only two of them...
uranium and thorium
gave off rays.
That's right.
Then
you measured the uranium and thorium
And that's when I run
into trouble.
radioactivity than I can explained
by the amount of
uranium and thorium had in it.
Would you like to show me
how you make your measurements
Marie?
You wouldn't mind?
Of course not.
Alright.
Here is what I've done
so many times that I lost count.
Now we know that
the rays came from the uranium
and thorium that are
in this pitch blende.
Those two elements
give off the rays.
Correct.
I put the pitch blende
in this mortar.
Has the mortar always been clean?
Always and grinded up.
Here is the ground pitch blende
throw in the uranium
and thorium in it
I also fill a disk level full.
Just like what I've done
every time.
Then I placed it
in the electrometer.
And I close the case
so there is no draft.
Good.
I charged the electrometer.
Now I will find out
how much energy to raise
is it right?
Right. Start.
Ready. Read.
Eight.
Eight.
This pitch blende
with the uranium and the thorium
still in it comes to eight.
Now, here is pure uranium
I strike it
in the same amount of pitch blende.
This is exactly the same case
close the case
charged the electrometer
Now, we will find out
how much energy
the rays in the uranium have.
Right.
Ready. Read.
Two, same as always.
Not that I can see.
We know then that...
comes to eight and that
I am going to test the thorium.
From the same amount of pitch blende?
Of course, and put in exactly
the same case
close the case
charged the electrometer.
Now we find out how much energy
the rays in thorium have?
Right.
Ready. Read.
Two
I don't understand.
There must be a mistake.
When the uranium and thoarum are
in the pitch blende
the reading is eight.
But individually
they only total four.
Have you checked
all the other elements
in the pitch blende?
There is no the result.
Every elements in existence.
Uranium and thorium are
the only elements that give off rays.
Why do they give off twice
as much when they are
in the pitch blende as they do
as they were tested separately?
Where are those
four missing points?
That is what I don't understand.
I don't understand.
You make the chemical analysis of
what is content
in the pitch blende, didn't you?
Of course. Could I see it?
Yes.
Uranium oxide - 75%
Chlorium Oxide - 13%
Lead sulfide - 3%
Silicon dioxide - 2%
Calcium oxide - 3%
Barium oxide - 2%
Iron oxide - 1%
Magnesium oxide - 1/990%
other extraneous elements
Pierre Yes?
definitely known substances
isn't it?
Elements are fixed forever
in earth unchanging
we know that, don't we?
All of our scientist
based on that
All of our science is
based on that. Go on
In the beginning
man used to think that the world
have only of four elements,
earth, air, fire and water.
They thought that everything
in their universe
could be made out of those.
Yes. Go on.
But They were wrong, weren't they?
They were wrong.
Now we know that
there are 78 elements
The elements over there
on the shelves
but we assume that...
these missing elements
have the same character
as those we know already.
That is right
Pierre
What if there is
a kind of matter in the world
What would that mean?
Marie, that would mean
that our whole conception of the
nature of matter would
have to be changed.
It is cold in here.
Tell me what you are thinking.
I don't quite dare.
Go on and say it now matter
how crazy it sounds.
What if we did not make a mistake
in our measurement?
What if the conception
of science is wrong?
that is not in earth
but alive, dynamic?
Do we dare think that our
four missing points
these strange power
is of 1/1000%?
Pierre.
We have discovered a new element.
An active element.
What was left over
After I extract
the uranium and the thoarum
it must be in there.
Where it is?
In the resin...
Close the curtains.
Ready?
Marie, if your four missing
points are here
our notion of the universe
will be changed.
Ready? Read.
Four.
Oh, Pierre.
Marie. This new concept.
If we can prove the existence
of this new element
it may enable us to look into
the secret of life itself
deeper than ever before in the
history of the world.
Madame Curie, you must realize
that the board
has given you repetition
every consideration. However...
the university has not an
extensive budget
for the creation of
new laboratories
and for the new equipment
you ask for.
You state that...
you and Dr. Curie had detected
the presence of a new element
an active element.
But unfortunately
you have given us
no convincing proof
of its existence.
We have demonstrated of
its existence experimentally.
We have carried on our
research intensely
except for five weeks
in the autumn.
In September
my daughter was born
and a week later
my husband has the misfortune to
lose his mother.
But the rest of the time, we have
devoted entirely to research.
And yet in this eight
or nine months
you have came no closer
to any proof
as to the existence of ah...
what is the name of it?
Ah, my wife has named it radium.
Oh yes, radium
I should like to ask
Dr. Curie a question.
Yes, Professor Roger
This work.
Will it require
quite a little time
will it not? Yes, of course.
But you are already
teaching at school
of physics and chemistry.
And Madam Curie is teaching at
It would be
a formidable undertaking
under the best of circumstances.
Under these conditions
hardly seems promising.
her acknowledged abilities is
to say so young
inexperienced, and a woman.
Gentleman. If you please.
entirely irrelevant.
It is perfectly true
that she has not
had the experience
that most of us have had
and as you say she is a woman.
But let me impress upon you
gentlemen
that she is of most unusual woman
I might say her, ah
a most unusual woman.
You can't classify her
with that term
I have had the opportunity of
observing Madam Curie
very closely
and I can assure you, gentlemen
that she is remarkable scientist
as scrupulous as she is brilliant
and furthermore...
Of course, gentlemen
you understand
that I am looking upon
Madame Curie
with complete coolness
and complete detachment
as I would in judging
any other colleague.
We understand that
Translation
Translate and read this script in other languages:
Select another language:
- - Select -
- 简体中文 (Chinese - Simplified)
- 繁體中文 (Chinese - Traditional)
- Español (Spanish)
- Esperanto (Esperanto)
- 日本語 (Japanese)
- Português (Portuguese)
- Deutsch (German)
- العربية (Arabic)
- Français (French)
- Русский (Russian)
- ಕನ್ನಡ (Kannada)
- 한국어 (Korean)
- עברית (Hebrew)
- Gaeilge (Irish)
- Українська (Ukrainian)
- اردو (Urdu)
- Magyar (Hungarian)
- मानक हिन्दी (Hindi)
- Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Italiano (Italian)
- தமிழ் (Tamil)
- Türkçe (Turkish)
- తెలుగు (Telugu)
- ภาษาไทย (Thai)
- Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
- Čeština (Czech)
- Polski (Polish)
- Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Românește (Romanian)
- Nederlands (Dutch)
- Ελληνικά (Greek)
- Latinum (Latin)
- Svenska (Swedish)
- Dansk (Danish)
- Suomi (Finnish)
- فارسی (Persian)
- ייִדיש (Yiddish)
- հայերեն (Armenian)
- Norsk (Norwegian)
- English (English)
Citation
Use the citation below to add this screenplay to your bibliography:
Style:MLAChicagoAPA
"Madame Curie" Scripts.com. STANDS4 LLC, 2024. Web. 29 Aug. 2024. <https://www.scripts.com/script/madame_curie_13121>.
Discuss this script with the community:
Report Comment
We're doing our best to make sure our content is useful, accurate and safe.
If by any chance you spot an inappropriate comment while navigating through our website please use this form to let us know, and we'll take care of it shortly.
Attachment
You need to be logged in to favorite.
Log In