Mother: Caring for 7 Billion Page #6
that we empower women,
I mean it's just common sense
and it's difficult to
understand...
why we are still not getting it.
Why we are still keeping
half of the population
in a situation where,
it cannot contribute to
the wealth...
of the country and to
the wealth of the world.
I'm hoping, that one day...
we would have... more women
who would have opportunities
to go to school,
to learn how to read and write,
Not even from western ideologies,
within their culture,
within their religion,
they have rights,
but they don't know.
And we don't have to go
far to start...
teaching them these things.
We can start right from within
the culture
and then go the next steps.
You can't liberate the women...
without changing the men or
you will just end up with
a lot of beaten women.
So changing...
humanity of women
is critically important.
vexing thing
called gender.
You know people feel uncomfortable
talking about it,
but as the great sociologist
Louis Wirth said,
"The most important things
about a society
uncomfortable talking about.
We saw that about race
and we certainly see it
about gender.
Before Copernicus
everyone thought that the Earth
was the center of the Universe
because the Sun revolved
around the Earth.
had to be reconstructed
and that's where we are
now with economics
and economic policy.
We've got to reconstruct
the whole thing
and to realize that
it is the economy
that is a subset of the
Earth's environment.
What does it take for
humanity to live
within the means of
one planet?
We haven't found the
silver bullet yet.
But essentially you start to look
at all these five factors:
population, consumption, efficiency...
productivity of ecosystems, etc.
to see how we can match
them all
to get us back... within,
the capacity of one planet
and possibly even below
that line because
some space we want
to leave for wild species
because they too need food.
If there's anything we know is
coded into our genes
it's out-reproduce your buddies.
That is the principle of
natural selection,
we wouldn't be here if
it doesn't work,
we do it in the laboratory
all the time,
we see it in nature all the time
to override it
No society we know has ever
fully exercised it's ability
to keep reproducing.
The big problem today intellectually
is consumption.
Many economists think
that the solution
is to consume more.
But of course to consume
more means
wrecking the planet more.
And we don't have... there are no
consumption condoms.
The reason you want to
start controling
the size of the population early,
is that to do it humanely,
it takes many decades.
Whereas we know we can solve
the consumption problem,
in a very short time.
We're going to need
a different compass
than growth as it is
currently measured.
We want to grow in wisdom,
we want to grow in knowledge,
we want to grow in just
plain smarts
in figuring out how to live well
and take care of each other
on this planet.
There's many opportunities
now for
developing countries to be
able to leap frog
over the traditional path
of development,
the way that we got rich
in the US or in Europe.
In every poor community
you're going to find
these kinds of social entrepreneurs
that are figuring out
a different way to create
a better lifestyle.
People are already creating
solar energy
and bio gas solutions,
more village level or homestead
level solutions.
The real wealth of a nation,
indeed of the world
is not financial.
We've certainly seen that
in the economic melt down;
that the real wealth of a
nation consists
really of the contributions
of people and of nature.
And we therefore need
what we haven't had
economic policies that give
visibility and value
to the work of caring for people,
starting in early childhood
and caring for our Mother Earth.
Sweden, Finland, Norway,
invested in what I call
They have policies that are very,
very much intended
to help care for people
starting in early childhood
not only universal health care,
high quality childcare,
very generous paid parental leave
for both mothers and fathers.
that these should be countries
with a very large population
because after all these are what
we call family friendly policies,
but on the contrary
they have a very stable,
low population growth.
By investing more,
in that high quality human capital
you have a more skilled,
if you will, functionally
literate society
and you also will have people
who will contribute more
to programs like social security.
This is a kind of shift
that is very tough to imagine
in our current political climate
but this idea of investment
of public goods
is a big part of a sustainable
economy.
Before I went to Ethiopia
I intellectually understood...
a smaller biological family.
But now... I feel like I really get it.
About how population is
the thing
putting all this pressure on
children's rights and...
on our planet.
I think it's interesting
that I'm the one...
being in this population film.
My brothers and sisters have gone
on to have many children.
Their children are now
having children.
A lot people have advanced
degrees.
We have a surgeon,
lawyers, doctors,
but it's still just an issue
of numbers.
Each person has a car, each
person has to have a home.
The impact is huge.
And I realize that it...
it starts with
people like me and like JP
just sitting down together
at the beginning of our families
and saying, "Our planets limits
have changed. "
"How are we going to change
how we make a family?
As long as you acknowledge that
you do have choices
and you take responsibility
for those choices,
I think happiness is something
that we all can have
whether or not we
have a child, or not
whether we are parents or not.
Everyone has their own path,
everyone has their own choices,
everyone has their own desires,
hopes and dreams
and that diversity is a
good thing.
There are people working
on agricultural issues,
food security, HIV/ AIDS, etc.
We cannot deny...
that population growth
is the common factor
that could help the
missions and agendas
of all of these separate groups.
There should be more dialogues
between those groups,
there should be more
comprehensive...
programs being delivered
into communities.
So until we reprioritize...
we're going to continue
to just focus on...
crises that result from
population growth issues...
of the day.
We will need our collective
thinking as humans.
And that's an opportunity
maybe,
to break the barrier
between
Translation
Translate and read this script in other languages:
Select another language:
- - Select -
- 简体中文 (Chinese - Simplified)
- 繁體中文 (Chinese - Traditional)
- Español (Spanish)
- Esperanto (Esperanto)
- 日本語 (Japanese)
- Português (Portuguese)
- Deutsch (German)
- العربية (Arabic)
- Français (French)
- Русский (Russian)
- ಕನ್ನಡ (Kannada)
- 한국어 (Korean)
- עברית (Hebrew)
- Gaeilge (Irish)
- Українська (Ukrainian)
- اردو (Urdu)
- Magyar (Hungarian)
- मानक हिन्दी (Hindi)
- Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Italiano (Italian)
- தமிழ் (Tamil)
- Türkçe (Turkish)
- తెలుగు (Telugu)
- ภาษาไทย (Thai)
- Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
- Čeština (Czech)
- Polski (Polish)
- Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Românește (Romanian)
- Nederlands (Dutch)
- Ελληνικά (Greek)
- Latinum (Latin)
- Svenska (Swedish)
- Dansk (Danish)
- Suomi (Finnish)
- فارسی (Persian)
- ייִדיש (Yiddish)
- հայերեն (Armenian)
- Norsk (Norwegian)
- English (English)
Citation
Use the citation below to add this screenplay to your bibliography:
Style:MLAChicagoAPA
"Mother: Caring for 7 Billion" Scripts.com. STANDS4 LLC, 2024. Web. 19 Nov. 2024. <https://www.scripts.com/script/mother:_caring_for_7_billion_14102>.
Discuss this script with the community:
Report Comment
We're doing our best to make sure our content is useful, accurate and safe.
If by any chance you spot an inappropriate comment while navigating through our website please use this form to let us know, and we'll take care of it shortly.
Attachment
You need to be logged in to favorite.
Log In