Page One: Inside the New York Times Page #6
But to say you got it wrong
when your sources were wrong,
that, as your colleagues
at "The New York Times" have said,
reduces your role as a journalist
to no more than a stenographer.
No, on the contrary,
I really reject that criticism.
We made errors in our coverage
of the weapons of mass destruction.
We made them at the reporting
level and at the editing level.
Does she tell the truth?
"The New York Times"
can't have a reporter-
And we don't.
Anytime "The Times" fails
on a serious scale
on a particular story, a big story,
there's a cost.
There's a price to pay.
And certainly in recent years,
"Well, I no longer need 'The Times.'
I can no longer trust 'The Times."'
One more Jayson Blair
or one more Judy Miller
and you're chipping away
at this institution
that everyone is sort
of desperate to protect.
I think kind of until Jayson Blair,
they were kind of impervious.
They were Teflon.
a real scandalous occasion.
The reporter was found
to be reporting stories
at places where he was
not actually there,
though the dateline would give
indication that he was there,
taking stories and not even
rewriting them-
written by other people
at other newspapers.
He eventually got caught
because he plagiarized
a story from someone
who had previously been
a colleague of his at "The Times."
Not only does he take
and wind a rope around his neck
and, like, go jumping off
a cliff, you know,
right in plain sight,
but he ties it to our feet and tries
to pull us off the cliff with him.
The minute they put it
on the front page in that little box-
I still remember the day it came out-
Raines's reign was over.
This system is not set up
to catch someone
who sets out to lie
and to use every means
at his or her disposal
to put false information
into the paper.
You went from having Howell
being the most successful editor,
not just in the history
of "The Times,"
in the history of newspapering,
to his being fired.
I'm delighted to announce Bill Keller
as our next executive editor.
I'm aiming to raise our ambitions
higher than they've ever been.
When Bill came in,
he was all about
restoring trust
after Howell Raines.
He was supposed to sort of get
the ship back on course.
It just wasn't
in the conversation that,
you know, there was going
to be an economic crisis in journalism.
And that's been
the dominant event,
I think if you
asked him, on his watch.
Darker times
are ahead for the "Grey Lady."
"The Times" will resort to layoffs.
100 jobs from its news staff
by the end of the week.
We're hearing that the layoffs
are beginning today.
We now know how many people
have opted to go voluntarily,
which means we know how many
people we have to layoff.
In the immediate moment,
we're in the middle of cutting
100 people out of a staff
of roughly 1250.
We've spent a lot of time
in the last couple of weeks
going over lists,
trying to prioritize
based on skills
we can afford to lose.
We are not a specialized newspaper,
we're a general-interest newspaper.
And we try to be excellent
at everything from foreign coverage
to education coverage
to arts to sports.
You know, we're large, but there's
not a lot of slack in the system.
I feel some days that,
you know,
we should be
symbolically wearing, you know,
bloody butchers' smocks
or something around the newsroom.
It's such a kind of
grim undertaking.
I was hired in 1977.
When I was trying
to get this job,
a job-getting focus group
asked me to write my own obituary.
And since then, I've been
the deputy editor of obituaries.
Hey, it's Claiborne Ray,
the departing retiring person.
Should I come down through
the freight elevator
or through the regular
passenger elevator?
I came with the high hopes
of staying for one year.
I've overstayed that by 20 years.
We have to
dump bodies overboard.
They don't really have any choice.
We all got the packets in the mail.
There's something obviously dispiriting
about getting a packet in the mail
that invites you to leave your job.
I almost feel like I don't know
of everything that's going on
and I almost feel like
I don't have a clear grasp
on the enormity of the situation.
I decided not to press my luck.
Nobody knows if there'll be a paper
on paper in another five years.
Everybody is
unbelievably pressured to do
more than people
are really humanly able to do.
I'm sorry to leave "The Times."
There are a lot of unemployed
people out there,
a lot of underemployed people
and a lot of scared people.
And I have to remind myself every day
that I'm one of the lucky ones.
The main effect is just this insecurity
that pervades
the newspaper business.
The mood is so funereal.
For those of us who work in media,
life is a drumbeat
of goodbye speeches
with sheet cakes
That carnage has left behind
like model trains whose
cabooses have square wheels.
Sure, I've been fired
in my day, but always after
I'd failed to show up at work
like a normal person.
"Go to treatment," my editor at the
magazine in Minneapolis would tell me.
"There's a bed waiting for you."
But at the tender age oi 31,
I still had a year left
before hitting rock bottom,
a year left of being that guy,
the violent drug-snorting thug,
before I found
my way to this guy,
the one with a family and a job
at "The New York Times."
One day I came over from
"The Twin Cities Reader" where I worked,
came over here to the Skyway Lounge
and met my friend Phil.
Phil gave me
a film canister full of coke,
and I was going to get a gram.
I went into the bathroom,
the cop hit
the stall door that I was in
and said,
"You roll a noisy joint, pal."
And he immediately
put me up against the wall
and then walked me down
the street this way
and up the block toward Nicollet Mall
where his car was parked.
The interesting thing about that is that
my father worked right in City Center,
so I was being crabwalked
in handcuffs past the shopping-
the downtown shopping center
where my father worked.
It was another life.
It was another guy.
It's that guy.
Not very.
Look, I'm afraid of guns
and I'm afraid of bats.
I'm really not afraid of anything else.
It's an advantage of having
lived a textured life.
I've been a single parent on welfare.
This is nothing.
I was talking to John Hume
and he said, "Look,
you didn't go to Afghanistan.
You didn't tum
into the great city-hall columnist.
You didn't set out to be
a media reporter, but you are.
And your story has arrived
and it behooves you
to man up, show some sack
and cover it until it's done."
And I thought, "You know what?
That's what I'm going to do."
Welcome, everyone, to another debate
from "Intelligence Squared."
We'll be debating this motion:
Good riddance
to the mainstream media.
Translation
Translate and read this script in other languages:
Select another language:
- - Select -
- 简体中文 (Chinese - Simplified)
- 繁體中文 (Chinese - Traditional)
- Español (Spanish)
- Esperanto (Esperanto)
- 日本語 (Japanese)
- Português (Portuguese)
- Deutsch (German)
- العربية (Arabic)
- Français (French)
- Русский (Russian)
- ಕನ್ನಡ (Kannada)
- 한국어 (Korean)
- עברית (Hebrew)
- Gaeilge (Irish)
- Українська (Ukrainian)
- اردو (Urdu)
- Magyar (Hungarian)
- मानक हिन्दी (Hindi)
- Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Italiano (Italian)
- தமிழ் (Tamil)
- Türkçe (Turkish)
- తెలుగు (Telugu)
- ภาษาไทย (Thai)
- Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
- Čeština (Czech)
- Polski (Polish)
- Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Românește (Romanian)
- Nederlands (Dutch)
- Ελληνικά (Greek)
- Latinum (Latin)
- Svenska (Swedish)
- Dansk (Danish)
- Suomi (Finnish)
- فارسی (Persian)
- ייִדיש (Yiddish)
- հայերեն (Armenian)
- Norsk (Norwegian)
- English (English)
Citation
Use the citation below to add this screenplay to your bibliography:
Style:MLAChicagoAPA
"Page One: Inside the New York Times" Scripts.com. STANDS4 LLC, 2024. Web. 23 Dec. 2024. <https://www.scripts.com/script/page_one:_inside_the_new_york_times_15494>.
Discuss this script with the community:
Report Comment
We're doing our best to make sure our content is useful, accurate and safe.
If by any chance you spot an inappropriate comment while navigating through our website please use this form to let us know, and we'll take care of it shortly.
Attachment
You need to be logged in to favorite.
Log In