Particle Fever
- No, I don't know.
- A few people.
I was... it was terrible.
Tomorrow's will be better.
I don't think I can say that.
Say it in a public forum.
I need... I need evidence.
It's big, no?
Ever since I entered physics,
people have been talking about
this machine.
The Large Hadron Collider,
the biggest machine
is finally going to turn on.
And after many, many years
of waiting and theorizing
about how matter got created
and about what
the deep fundamental theory
of nature is...
all those theories
are finally going to be tested,
and we're gonna know something.
And we don't know
what it's gonna be now,
but we will know,
and it's gonna change
everything.
And if the LHC
sees new particles,
we're on the right track.
And if it doesn't, not
only have we missed something,
but we may not ever know
how to proceed.
We are at a fork in the road,
and it's either going to be
a golden era...
Oh!
Or it's going to be quite stark.
And I've never heard of
a moment like this in history,
where an entire field
- Hi.
- Hi.
- I'm David.
- I'm Fabiola.
Fabiola, nice to meet you.
So, look, I have suggested
to be on this side
because this big wheel
is quite spectacular.
Yeah, yeah.
More than ever,
this will require
the collaboration
between the theory
and experimentalists,
so it would be
a very nice period
where we work together and,
uh...
Well, it's fun to finally
interact with experimentalists.
I mean, I used to be
just in my office,
coming up with, you know,
crazy ideas.
It's a big thing.
There is a general sense waiting
for this machine to start,
this massive machine that has
taken so many years to build.
We are all in great anticipation
of what it might find.
And every time
there's even a rumor
that a new particle
is discovered...
even before it turns on...
the entire field
goes into a fever pitch.
The experiment was designed
initially in the mid '80s
and has taken
this long to construct.
There are 10,000 people
of over 100 nationalities.
That includes countries
which are mortal enemies
of each other,
like India and Pakistan,
and Georgia and Russia,
and Iran and Israel.
All have physicists
working on this machine.
These big blue things
are 7-ton
superconducting magnets,
which have to be cooled
with liquid helium
to the coldest temperatures
on Earth,
colder than empty space.
There are 100,000 computers
connected all over the world
to deal with the data.
In fact, the worldwide web
was invented at CERN
so that physicists
all over the planet
could share the data.
The United States was building
a machine just like this,
in fact, a bigger machine,
in Texas,
but they ran into
a small technical difficulty.
I doubt anyone believes
that the most pressing issues
facing the nation include
an insufficient understanding
of the origins of the universe.
Unfortunately, the
Superconducting Super Collider
was canceled by Congress
in 1993.
And finally, he's saying,
"Well, if we don't do it,
the Europeans will do it."
Let them do it!
We'll steal their technology
like they steal our technology.
It got very political.
It was very expensive,
very complicated.
It's hard for physicists
to explain
why we do
these kinds of experiments.
The purpose of the machine
is not military application.
It's not commercial application.
It's to understand something
about the basic laws of physics.
There are two kinds
of particle physicists:
There are the experimentalists.
They built the big machines,
run the experiments,
analyze the data,
and try to discover things,
like new particles;
And then there are
the theorists, like me.
We construct the theories
that try to explain everything
we see in nature.
Without us, the experimentalists
are in the dark,
but without them,
we'll never know the truth.
I mean, if you go,
it won't be so terrible.
When I was at Stanford,
I had a mentor:
Savas Dimopoulos.
Savas only likes to work
on the biggest puzzles.
Now, just for fun,
I wanted to tell you that the
enabling technologies that...
He has
some of the most famous theories
that will be tested at the LHC,
but he doesn't know
if any of them are true,
so there's an intensity with
which he approaches physics.
If he works on a paper that
could result in a Nobel Prize,
he doesn't allow more
than three people on the paper,
because you can only share
the Nobel Prize
with three people.
That's the level
at which he's operating
and the impact
he's trying to have.
Takes us beyond the
confines of atomic physics.
In particle physics,
you have to have a threshold
amount of intelligence,
whatever that means.
But the thing
that differentiates scientists
is purely an artistic ability
to discern what is a good idea,
what is a beautiful idea,
what is worth spending time on,
and, most importantly,
what is a problem that
is sufficiently interesting,
yet sufficiently difficult
that it hasn't yet been solved,
but the time
for solving it has come now?
So people have been waiting
for this experiment,
the LHC, for a very long time.
Nothing like it
has ever happened.
All the superlatives
are justified.
This is the case
where the hype is...
the hype
is approximately accurate.
To get, you know, 3,000 people
to work
on an experiment together,
whose goal is to understand
what's going on at distances
a thousand times smaller
than the proton...
this is... this is a really
extraordinary testament
to what...
to some of the highest ideals
we can have as human beings.
It's...
Nima and I got our PhDs
around the same time.
He's a couple years ahead of me.
And Nima
is the star of our generation,
and he's the guy we all followed
and looked up to
and tried to keep up with
and tried to outpace
if we could.
Since the mid '70s,
we've had an amazingly
successful theory of nature
that we call the Standard Model
of particle physics.
But sitting in the heart
of the theory is a sickness,
very, very glaring
conceptual problems
that infected
this fantastic understanding.
Why is the universe big?
Why is gravity so much weaker
than all the other forces?
The kinds of answers that this
theory gives to these questions
seems so patently absurd
that we think that we're missing
something very, very big.
And on top of all of that,
there is one prediction
of this theory...
absolutely crucial
for it to even make
internal theoretical sense...
and this is
the famous Higgs particle.
The Higgs, or something like it,
must show up.
If it doesn't show up,
there's something
truly, deeply wrong,
very, very, deeply wrong
with the way
we think about physics.
There are strong reasons
to think that some
of these questions
will find answers at the LHC.
There's been no shortage
of ideas
for what they might be,
but this is really
this generation of people's...
my generation of people's...
Translation
Translate and read this script in other languages:
Select another language:
- - Select -
- 简体中文 (Chinese - Simplified)
- 繁體中文 (Chinese - Traditional)
- Español (Spanish)
- Esperanto (Esperanto)
- 日本語 (Japanese)
- Português (Portuguese)
- Deutsch (German)
- العربية (Arabic)
- Français (French)
- Русский (Russian)
- ಕನ್ನಡ (Kannada)
- 한국어 (Korean)
- עברית (Hebrew)
- Gaeilge (Irish)
- Українська (Ukrainian)
- اردو (Urdu)
- Magyar (Hungarian)
- मानक हिन्दी (Hindi)
- Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Italiano (Italian)
- தமிழ் (Tamil)
- Türkçe (Turkish)
- తెలుగు (Telugu)
- ภาษาไทย (Thai)
- Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
- Čeština (Czech)
- Polski (Polish)
- Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Românește (Romanian)
- Nederlands (Dutch)
- Ελληνικά (Greek)
- Latinum (Latin)
- Svenska (Swedish)
- Dansk (Danish)
- Suomi (Finnish)
- فارسی (Persian)
- ייִדיש (Yiddish)
- հայերեն (Armenian)
- Norsk (Norwegian)
- English (English)
Citation
Use the citation below to add this screenplay to your bibliography:
Style:MLAChicagoAPA
"Particle Fever" Scripts.com. STANDS4 LLC, 2024. Web. 22 Dec. 2024. <https://www.scripts.com/script/particle_fever_15623>.
Discuss this script with the community:
Report Comment
We're doing our best to make sure our content is useful, accurate and safe.
If by any chance you spot an inappropriate comment while navigating through our website please use this form to let us know, and we'll take care of it shortly.
Attachment
You need to be logged in to favorite.
Log In