Physical Evidence Page #5
- R
- Year:
- 1989
- 99 min
- 85 Views
that Joe Paris is guilty
of the cold-blooded
murder of Jacob farley.
Thank you.
Does the defense
wish to make
an opening statement?
We do, your honor, but we reserve
opening until the government
has concluded its case.
The state calls
Matthew farley.
Matthew farley.
Matt, will you please
tell the court your experience
the night
of September the 23rd.
The 23rd was a Wednesday.
Every Wednesday we went
to this little fish place
for dinner.
My sister, Amy,
and I both went.
And on the night
of the 23rd?
My father called
from the club
and said he couldn't make it.
He tell you why?
He said he was
going to meet Joe Paris.
He said Paris
had been bugging him again.
That it was time he dealt with
the bastard once and for all.
Objection! Hearsay!
Move to strike.
Sustained.
The witness's last comment
will be stricken from the record.
Did you recognize
the name of Joe Paris?
Yeah.
6 months ago,
Paris came into the club
and got into a shouting fight
with my father.
This Joe Paris
that fought that night
with your father in the club,
can you identify him
here in the courtroom?
Him.
Let the record show the witness
pointed to the defendant.
We had
a good band that night,
but everybody
was listening to the yelling
at the entrance.
Do you recall
what was yelled?
Yeah.
He kept sayin' that my father
wouldn't be around much longer.
How did you feel
when you then heard
that your father
was going to meet Joe Paris
on September the 23rd?
I was afraid for him.
Thank you.
No further questions.
Mr. farley, do you know for a fact
that your father
actually met Mr. Paris
on the night of the 23rd?
-It's where he said he was going.
You do not know
that he actually met
Mr. Paris?
-No.
Mr. farley, what business
was your father in?
He had a club.
Is this the same club
that you yourself
have now taken over?
-Yeah.
You did not close it down
at all for the funeral?
Objection!
-Sustained. Counselor.
Since you have taken
it over so easily,
you must know a lot about
your father's business.
Did he ever do business
with anyone else
named Joe Paris?
-No.
Do you know a Joe parish?
With an "h"?
Yeah.
Were you aware
that Mr. parish
owed your father
a lot of money?
Objection! Not covered by direct.
Over-ruled. You many
answer the question.
Yeah, well, parish
didn't come down to the club.
But that prick did.
Mr. farley,
this is a court of law.
Choose your
language accordingly.
Shall I repeat the question,
Mr. farley?
Look, lady,
this is all lawyer bullshit.
Answer the question.
Because I have
a tape of Joe Paris,
that Joe Paris, saying
he's going to kill my father.
Objection!
That's hearsay!
Mr. farley, you will limit
your answers
to the questions asked.
He didn't come home
that night. I went down to the club,
there were some tapes.
One had Paris' name on it.
Your honor, I object! I object!
-P-a-r-l-s.
Order!
The witness's answer
will be stricken
from the record.
And the jury is instructed
to disregard his statements.
Counsel may sidebar.
Your honor,
the district attorney
said nothing about
a tape during discovery.
We had no knowledge
of any tape.
I now want a warrant for
possible admission into evidence.
Your honor, I ask
the tape not be admitted
into evidence, since it was not
discovered prior to trial.
Denied.
Where is the tape now,
Mr. farley?
At the club.
Your honor,
unless the state proves
that this tape is authentic,
I must ask for a mistrial.
It is technically possible
to re-edit a recording
so that the intent
of that person
is completely taken
out of context,
or even contradicted.
That's true, counselor.
We'll recess to allow
prosecution to secure the tape
and test its authenticity.
All rise. Hear ye.
Hear ye. Hear ye.
All persons who have
anything further to do...
So, tell me
about the tapes.
Farley used to tape everything.
-How?
The same way
Nixon did.
How do you think
Jake got that club?
So the tapes
are real?
She made a mistake,
farley, but you screw around with her,
I'll take
those goddamn tapes
and I'll stick 'em
up your ass. You got that?
Can't we discuss
this rationally, Joe?
No. How's this for rational?
Give the lady back her money,
give me the tapes,
and get off her back.
Otherwise you know what I'll do.
What is Matt farley doing with
something like that, anyway?
Trying to find
his father's murderer.
We don't even know
when it was recorded.
3-7-84.
That's pretty stale. I mean,
it's more prejudicial than probative.
It demonstrates
the defendant's motive.
Miss Hudson, I'm inclined to
admit this tape.
However, I will give you
the opportunity
to have it examined for
authenticity by your own expert
prior to my
final ruling.
Now if you two
will excuse me.
That was pretty dirty.
I told you, I didn't know
anything about it.
This is the big time,
little girl.
You wanted high stakes,
you got 'em.
Public counsel.
I'm afraid
your client's been
hiding things from you.
You wanna meet me
at the bay tower room?
I was just
on my way home, James.
This is documentary evidence.
It blows your case wide open.
in court tomorrow.
That's fine with me.
-I'll be there.
Sit down.
No, thank you.
Have you seen
your client's war record?
He's a killer. Special forces,
Phoenix program.
He killed a lot of people
in Vietnam.
He strangled them.
The same way
he allegedly
strangled farley.
He was
trained for it.
You'll never get this into evidence.
It's 18 years old.
Are you ready to talk
a plea-bargain now?
Say, 2nd-degree?
Maybe it wasn't
premeditated.
I mean, strangling evidently
It's circumstantial and it doesn't
prove a thing.
You know what your problem is?
You're too hungry.
You wanna make
a name for yourself.
And you think Joe Paris
is your ticket.
I don't have to listen to this.
-There comes a point
when you gotta think
about your client first.
You can't win this. Murder 2
is the best you're gonna do.
He'll be out in 3 years, unless he
kills somebody else in the meantime.
You'd better
take him this offer.
Good night, James.
I'm going to nail
your man, Hudson.
Yeah, Paris.
Yeah. Guess what?
I just saw
your war record.
What do you mean?
Jesus Christ, Joe!
I don't understand.
I was in the war.
W-what's the problem?
You are lying,
that's what!
You wanted
to see me?
Yeah.
What are you doing?
Nicks told me he offered
a deal on the Paris case,
and you turned him down.
Is that true?
I know what I'm doing.
Hudson, the man is
as guilty as hell.
Now, who the f***
do you think you are,
f. Lee Bailey?
You've got a man's life
in your hands.
Are you willing
to take responsibility
for a guilty verdict?
Are you that sure of how well
you'll do in a trial?
You better be
damn sure, Hudson.
You know, one of the reasons
I use old pros
Translation
Translate and read this script in other languages:
Select another language:
- - Select -
- 简体中文 (Chinese - Simplified)
- 繁體中文 (Chinese - Traditional)
- Español (Spanish)
- Esperanto (Esperanto)
- 日本語 (Japanese)
- Português (Portuguese)
- Deutsch (German)
- العربية (Arabic)
- Français (French)
- Русский (Russian)
- ಕನ್ನಡ (Kannada)
- 한국어 (Korean)
- עברית (Hebrew)
- Gaeilge (Irish)
- Українська (Ukrainian)
- اردو (Urdu)
- Magyar (Hungarian)
- मानक हिन्दी (Hindi)
- Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Italiano (Italian)
- தமிழ் (Tamil)
- Türkçe (Turkish)
- తెలుగు (Telugu)
- ภาษาไทย (Thai)
- Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
- Čeština (Czech)
- Polski (Polish)
- Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Românește (Romanian)
- Nederlands (Dutch)
- Ελληνικά (Greek)
- Latinum (Latin)
- Svenska (Swedish)
- Dansk (Danish)
- Suomi (Finnish)
- فارسی (Persian)
- ייִדיש (Yiddish)
- հայերեն (Armenian)
- Norsk (Norwegian)
- English (English)
Citation
Use the citation below to add this screenplay to your bibliography:
Style:MLAChicagoAPA
"Physical Evidence" Scripts.com. STANDS4 LLC, 2024. Web. 24 Nov. 2024. <https://www.scripts.com/script/physical_evidence_15860>.
Discuss this script with the community:
Report Comment
We're doing our best to make sure our content is useful, accurate and safe.
If by any chance you spot an inappropriate comment while navigating through our website please use this form to let us know, and we'll take care of it shortly.
Attachment
You need to be logged in to favorite.
Log In