Red Lights Page #4
you just did a test.
That's right.
Were you facing
your subject?
Sure.
What about them?
Uh, they were in the control
booth, monitoring the subject.
Who was monitoring you?
to be monitoring me?
It's a joke.
So were you at the same
eye level as the subject?
Approximately, yes
- Under a light, I guess.
- Yes.
The way we are now?
More or less, I guess.
- You have the cards with you?
- No, I-I don't have them here.
- Oh. Yeah, here.
- Okay.
Okay.
Shoot
What do you
mean, "shoot"?
Go ahead. Shoot.
- T-To you?
- Sure.
- Here?
- Why not?
Okay.
Square.
Cross.
Square.
Square.
Star.
- Wave.
- How are you doing that?
- Methodological defects--
- No, w--w--they're not transparent, we make sure--
improper controls, the inadvertent
inclusion of relevant data
or, in this case,
all three at
the same time.
Congratulations.
Next time, try taking
them off first.
So why'd you hold the
card up to the light?
So you wouldn't think
about your glasses.
made during the Cold War--
under conditions controlled
by the Soviet authorities,
so there was no
independent investigations.
Leningrad, 1970.
Here Katia Novikova
carries out
one of her more
controversial experiments.
As you can see,
she concentrates intensely
on the heart of the frog,
at the beginning
making it beat faster,
then slower,
and then, stopping
it beating altogether.
Katia asserted that she had, she had
inherited her powers from her mother--
and that during her childhood,
she would see objects...
Only God is right
all the time, Dr. Matheson.
And yes, there are sensitives
who are impostors,
just like
there are skeptics.
Uh, you know, even scientists
But you, the
professional skeptics,
you also seem to be
experts in rhetoric.
Don't--don't bite off
my finger, doctor.
Look where
I'm pointing.
Scientists' mistakes are
usually random, Mr. Cohen.
Pseudo-scientists' mistakes
tend to be directional.
Dr. Matheson seems
to forget that she
set up her stall
on this over 30 years ago.
Most professionals are fully
aware of the dangers of fraud
and design their experiments with
every imaginable precaution.
We're believers, doctor,
not simply credulous.
often the most credulous
and are taken in by all
kinds of phenomena.
They're easy victims of fraud
because they think logically,
and professional magicians
count on that.
Like your client, for instance.
He's certainly one of them.
You should've told me
she would be here.
Oh, you said you wouldn't
speak to my client.
Are you scared of me too?
The question is why does every
parapsychological phenomenon vanish
when there's a qualified
skeptic in the room?
Three to four Americans say they've had
some kind of metaphysic experience
and an even
higher percentage say--
He's gotta be in on it.
He's in on it.
Doctor, this is a question for you.
Don't you think--?
Margaret, just
get out of there.
-and even my colleagues,
the experimental
psychologists--
They're just gonna box her in.
They're just boxing her in.
...about their approach
to strange occurrences.
This is just what I'm
saying, it's just rhetoric.
It's just
pure rhetoric,
it's just talking the talk,
but to refute the role
that all crows are black you need
just one single white one. Actually--
I've never seen a
white crow, have you?
Look a bit harder.
Miss Hansen, I believe that
you're Simon Silver's agent,
are you not?
gotten to know him pretty well
over the years,
is that true?
I'm privileged.
He's a constant inspiration.
Silver's comeback has turned
into an event.
His recent sell-out performances
in both Atlanta and Dallas
can only be described
as an unbelievable success.
Today he will be
performing in our city,
at the Columbus Theater, less than
Now, Miss Hansen, is "perform"...?
That's a funny word.
Do you think that's the right word
to describe what's going on here?
I would say "share."
Simon has never been ashamed of
sharing his extraordinary abilities.
I think that "perform"
I beg to disagree.
Why allow for
a rigorous study
when the mass spectacle
is there to be embraced
and there's money
to be made?
A lot of money,
I would imagine.
The word "choice."
Was subjected to rigorous studies
by at least two different--
Oh, come on!
Universities of
unquestionable renown.
But I guess
you know this, doctor,
since you were on one
of those committees.
on the findings however.
- Are you okay?
- Sh--sh--sh.
The
experiments weren't done
under proper
controlled conditions.
Yeah,
controlled conditions.
Those of us born different
feel real safe.
Complete inspection
of all body orifices,
locked away like animals,
And--and you're
surprised that Silver
refused to subject
himself to that.
No, I'm not
at all surprised
that he refused to
follow the one protocol
that would effectively eliminate
any possibility of fraud.
All this sounds very convincing,
doctor, but in actual fact,
telepathic experiments...
No, no, no, no, do not
go on the defensive.
Margaret, do not go
on the defensive!
She's going
on the defensive.
Can you see this?
This is what she does.
She goes on the defensive and
-in light of
my considerable experience
investigating these phenomena,
Aw, don't give
'em an edge.
...Of the existence
of paranormal powers...
She's gonna
mention the bone.
Just wait, she's gonna
mention the bone.
Do not
mention the bone.
I've spoken to some
whose eyes you
claim to have opened,
and, believe me, they don't
have very nice things
to say about you.
Telling people they've been
victimized by these crazy ideas
and then trying to get
the ideas away from them
it's like trying to take
a bone away from a dog.
They don't
want to let go.
Maybe / don'!
know my place but'-
How did
you know that?
Because I'm psychic.
Yes, she did,
that's exactly what we are to you.
We were animals.
What I'm saying is give me
proof that a photon of light
can pass through
a human body
and I will start to
believe in invisibility.
Until that happens,
is simple subjective beliefs.
What do you
believe in, Dr. Matheson?
Do you have a transcendent
view of life?
A what?
Well, you
talk about beliefs.
What do you
believe in?
Well, I don't really see what
that has to do with anything.
Well, it's a very
simple question
that maybe
you can answer.
I'm just asking you,
do you believe or don't you?
Well, I try to
understand, not believe.
So you accept that it's possible
there's something out there?
No, I didn't say that.
You're a
religious person?
No. You know, once, long
ago, I suppose I was.
Translation
Translate and read this script in other languages:
Select another language:
- - Select -
- 简体中文 (Chinese - Simplified)
- 繁體中文 (Chinese - Traditional)
- Español (Spanish)
- Esperanto (Esperanto)
- 日本語 (Japanese)
- Português (Portuguese)
- Deutsch (German)
- العربية (Arabic)
- Français (French)
- Русский (Russian)
- ಕನ್ನಡ (Kannada)
- 한국어 (Korean)
- עברית (Hebrew)
- Gaeilge (Irish)
- Українська (Ukrainian)
- اردو (Urdu)
- Magyar (Hungarian)
- मानक हिन्दी (Hindi)
- Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Italiano (Italian)
- தமிழ் (Tamil)
- Türkçe (Turkish)
- తెలుగు (Telugu)
- ภาษาไทย (Thai)
- Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
- Čeština (Czech)
- Polski (Polish)
- Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Românește (Romanian)
- Nederlands (Dutch)
- Ελληνικά (Greek)
- Latinum (Latin)
- Svenska (Swedish)
- Dansk (Danish)
- Suomi (Finnish)
- فارسی (Persian)
- ייִדיש (Yiddish)
- հայերեն (Armenian)
- Norsk (Norwegian)
- English (English)
Citation
Use the citation below to add this screenplay to your bibliography:
Style:MLAChicagoAPA
"Red Lights" Scripts.com. STANDS4 LLC, 2024. Web. 24 Nov. 2024. <https://www.scripts.com/script/red_lights_16700>.
Discuss this script with the community:
Report Comment
We're doing our best to make sure our content is useful, accurate and safe.
If by any chance you spot an inappropriate comment while navigating through our website please use this form to let us know, and we'll take care of it shortly.
Attachment
You need to be logged in to favorite.
Log In