Saving Capitalism Page #6
- Year:
- 2017
- 90 min
- 2,322 Views
want a law passed,
there's nearly a 60% chance
it will be passed.
And if they don't want a certain law,
it doesn't pass.
Then they looked at everyday voters.
Issues that almost no one supports
having 30% chance of becoming law.
Issues that almost everyone supports
also have a 30% chance of becoming law.
They concluded, in their own words...
"The preferences of the average American
appear to have only a miniscule -
near zero -
statistically non-significant impact
upon public policy."
how close you can come,
as just an average American,
to the White House.
But,
the decision-makers in the White House.
Over the last 50 years,
Washington has become an Emerald City.
It's capital money.
Money that is there for only one purpose,
and that is to influence outcomes.
It's apparent to me
that certain judges are alleging
that somehow corporations
have the same rights as citizens.
I don't accept that premise.
overturned laws on the books
for nearly a century,
and ruled that corporations
on political campaigns.
What's the point in individual people
trying to influence politics
with their donations
if Exxon or some other company
and therefore, cancel out,
the combined donations of every single
individual donor in the nation?
The cacophony now...
of special interests...
with...
with...
megaphones larger
than you've ever seen in your life,
will drown out...
the voice of the people.
The bottom line is this.
The Supreme Court
has just predetermined the winners
of next November's elections.
It won't be Republicans.
It won't be Democrats.
It will be corporate America.
Whose streets? Our streets!
Whose streets? Our streets!
Whose streets? Our streets!
Whose streets? Our streets!
There was a giant show of support
for the "Occupy Wall Street" movement
on Wednesday.
Approximately 10,000 people
marched through lower Manhattan.
We got sold out!
The truth is,
many of the reasons
they're hitting the streets
are similar to the reasons
the Tea Partiers began their protest:
crony capitalism,
bailouts to big business.
Washington should listen
to their message because it is similar
to the Tea Party's message.
That is crony capitalism needs to stop.
We have a voice!
We have a voice!
They're spending our children's money,
our grandchildren's money.
They're just going to continue
to push the country into debt.
They're gonna destroy
the economy of America.
It's not working for 99%
of our society anymore.
The 1% keep getting richer
and everyone else
It seems to me that the blame
has to be placed on both parties.
And it's time
we sent a clear message to them.
You either stop railroading our people
and our country,
or we're gonna throw all you bums out.
It is 9:
00 p.m. on the East Coast.And the moment of truth has arrived.
Welcome to the first debate night
of the 2016 presidential campaign
live from Quicken Loans Arena.
Mr. Trump, you have also
donated to several Democratic candidates.
You explained away those donations,
saying you did that
to get business-related favors.
You said recently, quote,
"When you give, they do
whatever the hell you want them to do."
-It's true.
- What did they do?
I will tell you that our system is broken.
I gave to many people.
Before this, two months ago,
I was a businessman.
I give to everybody.
When they call, I give.
And you know what?
When I need something from them
two, three years later, I call them.
They are there for me.
-What did you get?
-That's a broken system.
I've never heard a candidate, never,
who's received huge amounts of money
from oil,
from coal, from Wall Street,
from the military industrial complex...
Not one candidate.
"All these campaign contributions
will not influence me.
I'm gonna be independent."
But why do they make millions of dollars
of campaign contributions?
They expect something.
Everybody knows that.
You've received millions of dollars
in contributions and speaking fees
from Wall Street companies.
How do you convince voters
that you're gonna level the playing field
when you're indebted
to its biggest players?
Well, I think it's pretty clear
that they know that I will.
You've got two billionaire
hedge fund managers...
They want to hear
your thoughts on Donald.
Oh, yeah.
Trump.
Brutally honest?
Go for it. Yeah!
I think he's a great businessman.
Oh.
a businessman's standpoint.
Yeah?
-Do you know, he's against the union?
-A lot of people...
Yeah, I do. I do.
A lot of people don't like...
like to hear it, but I think
that's what this country needs.
A businessman.
-Not a politician.
-There you go.
we're being led too much by politics.
-"Politics"...
-Yes.
...instead of running this country
like a business.
But Donald Trump... Just...
It's a joke. He makes it into a joke.
-I agree but-
-We're a joke in other countries.
-He addresses a lot of the issues...
- The anger.
-...that are on...
- The anger.
Anger or issues.
It's anger. It's anger. He's...
He's using the people's anger
over the way government is operated.
And why do you think he's getting
the reaction that he's getting?
It's because he's saying stuff
that people are thinking.
- Oh, yeah.
-He's getting the reaction of the people.
That's the same thing with Bernie.
-Bernie's saying...
- Exactly.
That's why I like Bernie.
-And I like Trump. I'm torn.
- I know.
Bernie is a smart, intelligent man.
Bernie is my man.
So it's not Republican - Democrat.
- No!
- No, it's both.
-It is. So...
- Both of them.
If it was up to me, I would say,
"Hey, let's get a fresh stack of...
people that we can put in office."
I don't like any of them now.
- Re-elect nobody.
-Huh?
- Re-elect nobody.
- There you go!
Elect Willie Nelson.
Populism is a reaction
against those in power
But populism, let me hasten to say,
has two very different faces...
Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders.
But to be more general about it,
when people are angry
and frustrated and afraid,
and they feel economically insecure,
they tend to either move toward
authoritarian populism
which is, "Give me the strong man
who's going to fix everything
on behalf of the people."
But it's anti-Democratic
and often uses scapegoating
as a way to generate
greater and greater support.
Or, alternatively,
populism can take the form of reform.
That is "We're gonna rebuild the system.
We're going to create
a very, very different system
that is much more reflective
of the people's needs."
So populism is not necessarily good.
It depends...
on what form it takes.
Faith in our major institutions
has plummeted over the last 30 years.
And this is dangerous.
Translation
Translate and read this script in other languages:
Select another language:
- - Select -
- 简体中文 (Chinese - Simplified)
- 繁體中文 (Chinese - Traditional)
- Español (Spanish)
- Esperanto (Esperanto)
- 日本語 (Japanese)
- Português (Portuguese)
- Deutsch (German)
- العربية (Arabic)
- Français (French)
- Русский (Russian)
- ಕನ್ನಡ (Kannada)
- 한국어 (Korean)
- עברית (Hebrew)
- Gaeilge (Irish)
- Українська (Ukrainian)
- اردو (Urdu)
- Magyar (Hungarian)
- मानक हिन्दी (Hindi)
- Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Italiano (Italian)
- தமிழ் (Tamil)
- Türkçe (Turkish)
- తెలుగు (Telugu)
- ภาษาไทย (Thai)
- Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
- Čeština (Czech)
- Polski (Polish)
- Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Românește (Romanian)
- Nederlands (Dutch)
- Ελληνικά (Greek)
- Latinum (Latin)
- Svenska (Swedish)
- Dansk (Danish)
- Suomi (Finnish)
- فارسی (Persian)
- ייִדיש (Yiddish)
- հայերեն (Armenian)
- Norsk (Norwegian)
- English (English)
Citation
Use the citation below to add this screenplay to your bibliography:
Style:MLAChicagoAPA
"Saving Capitalism" Scripts.com. STANDS4 LLC, 2024. Web. 5 Nov. 2024. <https://www.scripts.com/script/saving_capitalism_17516>.
Discuss this script with the community:
Report Comment
We're doing our best to make sure our content is useful, accurate and safe.
If by any chance you spot an inappropriate comment while navigating through our website please use this form to let us know, and we'll take care of it shortly.
Attachment
You need to be logged in to favorite.
Log In