Silenced Page #6
- NOT RATED
- Year:
- 2014
- 102 min
- 90 Views
my secret life
in the cia's war on terror."
why would you
keep doing the torture
if you got information
that you thought was --
-'cause i think people
were panicked at the time
and they just couldn't
bring themselves to stop
in case that information
came out.
in the case
and the third prisoner
who was waterboarded, nashiri,
it turned out that
the information they provided
was not true.
they simply provided
what they thought
the interrogator wanted to hear
to stop
the waterboarding.
i can think of,
everything from grocery stores
to toys r us to starbucks.
you name it,
i've applied there.
haven't gotten
even an e-mail or a call back.
i'll be honest with you --
i really miss working,
and so, regardless
of what the job is,
i'm gonna be happy, i think,
just passing eight hours a day.
there were things
i said in that book
and i used a lot
of true names in the book, too,
people who weren't undercover.
i wanted to be
on the record
as saying that i thought
they were wrong.
this was
this is something that
the u.s. government and the cia
should not be involved in.
and a lot of people
at the cia disagree with me,
and i don't care.
not anymore.
i don't care.
[ toy playing
"brahms' lullaby" ]
-when he's awake
inside the house,
you know,
it's almost an obsession.
-"ruby puts..."
-you know, he's always
on the computer,
he's always on the phone.
there's really no moment
the kids know nothing
about what's going on.
and i try
and just protect them
and give john the space
to do what he needs to do.
he does put on, i think,
a really good, optimistic face,
but i know
it bothers him deep down.
-we're in the middle of what
are called cipa hearings,
stands for the classified
information procedures act.
we have identifies 100, maybe,
documents that are classified
that we believe are critical
to my ability to defend myself.
-ultimately, in this case,
judge brinkema
makes a determination
as to what will actually
be admissible and relevant
at trial
before a jury of his peers.
so, it's a critical phase.
on one side or the other
or maybe
somewhere in the middle.
so, i'm serious when i say
i've read every one of these
documents
and i can't defend myself
without them.
in the very beginning,
it would not be untruthful
to say that i felt suicidal.
i gave serious thought one day
to jumping in front
of a subway train.
that's how --
that's how...
how depressed i was
and how hopeless i felt.
-hello!
-in my very first meeting
with my attorneys,
they told me that
if i took a plea,
somewhere in the $50,000
to $100,000 range.
but they said,
"if you elect to go to trial,
that's gonna be
closer to $500,000."
so, here we are,
my bill is already $1 million,
and if we go
all the way through trial,
they told me to expect it now
to be as much as $2 million.
i can't pay
that kind of money.
yeah, we don't
need that anymore.
i don't know how i'll ever
have that kind of money
to pay that bill.
[ baby giggles ]
what?
-i knew that the white house
and hayden
had placed themselves
above the law,
and instead of choosing
to follow the constitution,
they had chosen
to not follow the constitution,
that they were now in violation
of the oath that they took
to support and defend
and, for the president,
to also protect.
i blew every whistle
there was internally.
early 2002,
i am a witness for this 9/11
congressional investigation.
i gave them incredibly
classified information
that was given to me.
and what's important
to understand is,
not only did i share everything
i knew about thinthread,
i also was given information
during this time period,
information that nsa had,
information that if it
had been shared
with the proper authorities,
what is called
national command authorities,
could have stopped 9/11.
i shared all that
with the committee.
prima facie, al qaeda and
associative movement information
that would have gone a long ways
to rolling up the plot.
it was in the database.
it was there.
no one knew it was there
because the systems
they had in place were abysmal.
nsa had abysmally failed
the nation.
now, i was charged
with putting together
the statement for the record
to find out
everything we could
about what nsa knew,
should have known,
or could have known
prior to 9/11.
and i was given
some extraordinary information
as a result of that --
the team.
that information was put into
the statement for the record --
the draft.
and then, while i was in england
on another assignment,
got this frantic
phone call saying,
"tom, we've been taken
off the effort."
i said, "why?"
"when you come back,
you'll have to find out."
[ big ben tolls ]
they did not want to tell
the truth to congress.
so, as soon as i got back,
i was pulled aside,
and in no uncertain terms,
i was told, "be careful.
they're looking for leakers."
this was not leakers
to the press.
they were looking
for leakers
to the congressional
9/11 investigations.
-they're coming down.
-they're in violation
of fisa.
they're in violation
of the fourth amendment.
they're now engaged
in an active coverup
at the highest levels.
i knew that i had been tagged
as someone who was a threat
to their ability
to keep from congress
what they knew
about 9/11.
and, in fact, there was
an edict that went out
from the highest levels of nsa,
through the deputy director,
to bury all the critical truth
about what nsa
actually knew about 9/11
and never let any investigator
period.
so, you know,
here i am, seeing all this,
the massive fraud,
waste, and abuse.
i had blown all the whistles
i knew per statute,
followed that all to the t.
nothing had happened.
it was clearly,
congress, institutionally,
had become complicit.
the primacy
of national security
was now trumping
the constitution.
and so, i made a fateful
decision in february of 2006
to make contact anonymously
with a reporter,
detailing with her
and i was doing so
for a period of a year.
an article
was written by her
in which, for the first time
as public reveal,
the existence
of a legal alternative
to the secret program
called thinthread.
the set of people that knew
about the secret program,
whether they were read into
or not, was very, very small.
associated with the program,
even if they were
peripheral.
i had been told
by very well-placed sources
that cheney personally said
Translation
Translate and read this script in other languages:
Select another language:
- - Select -
- 简体中文 (Chinese - Simplified)
- 繁體中文 (Chinese - Traditional)
- Español (Spanish)
- Esperanto (Esperanto)
- 日本語 (Japanese)
- Português (Portuguese)
- Deutsch (German)
- العربية (Arabic)
- Français (French)
- Русский (Russian)
- ಕನ್ನಡ (Kannada)
- 한국어 (Korean)
- עברית (Hebrew)
- Gaeilge (Irish)
- Українська (Ukrainian)
- اردو (Urdu)
- Magyar (Hungarian)
- मानक हिन्दी (Hindi)
- Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Italiano (Italian)
- தமிழ் (Tamil)
- Türkçe (Turkish)
- తెలుగు (Telugu)
- ภาษาไทย (Thai)
- Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
- Čeština (Czech)
- Polski (Polish)
- Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Românește (Romanian)
- Nederlands (Dutch)
- Ελληνικά (Greek)
- Latinum (Latin)
- Svenska (Swedish)
- Dansk (Danish)
- Suomi (Finnish)
- فارسی (Persian)
- ייִדיש (Yiddish)
- հայերեն (Armenian)
- Norsk (Norwegian)
- English (English)
Citation
Use the citation below to add this screenplay to your bibliography:
Style:MLAChicagoAPA
"Silenced" Scripts.com. STANDS4 LLC, 2024. Web. 22 Nov. 2024. <https://www.scripts.com/script/silenced_18127>.
Discuss this script with the community:
Report Comment
We're doing our best to make sure our content is useful, accurate and safe.
If by any chance you spot an inappropriate comment while navigating through our website please use this form to let us know, and we'll take care of it shortly.
Attachment
You need to be logged in to favorite.
Log In