Survivors Guide to Prison Page #6
- TV-MA
- Year:
- 2018
- 102 min
- 211 Views
"So, did you do it?"
Well, you have to say yes
because it has to be
consistent with everything.
"Well, how'd you do it?"
I didn't have adequate answers
for these questions.
So, they didn't buy it,
in a sense.
And, you know, rightly so.
And they sent a report
that was dispositive,
a negative report
back to the judge.
And he said, "I didn't realize
that youth authority
wouldn't be able to help you,
and so I'll allow you
to take back your guilty plea
and go ahead with trial.
Or I'll sentence you
So that began
another period of waiting.
[Susan] It would be well
over a year
before Bruce would get
another trial date.
23 hours a day in a cell
in isolation,
no contact with other juveniles,
only counselors,
one hour out for recreation.
able to introduce
an alternate suspect,
Bruce demanded his lawyer
knock down every argument
the prosecution could make.
The prosecutor said Bruce could
not have seen his mother's body
through the back window
of the house.
The sun's reflection
in the glass
and the furniture
would've blocked his view.
His defense
was the crime scene pictures
were taken
on a much sunnier day.
The prosecution claimed
all the bloody footprints
in the house
matched Bruce's shoes.
Bruce's defense said
his fingerprints
were not found anywhere
in the crime scene.
There was no evidence
that he wiped anything down
or made any attempt
to cover his tracks
because Bruce
had nothing to hide.
The prosecution
called Robert Hughes,
who claimed Bruce confessed
in the 7000 module
of county jail,
and the defense compared
Robert Hughes
to a used car salesman
who wasn't to be trusted.
Then, one day, they rapped
their keys on the door
and they said,
"Lisker, it's a verdict."
And my dad was there.
He was there
just every court day,
and he was right there
in the front row,
and we were just, you know...
eye contact,
but you can't really talk
because you're not allowed to...
it's not a visit, you know,
you're not allowed to visit
with your...
But he was... he was there,
and the jury comes in
one by one, you know,
excruciatingly slow,
sits down,
and the judge speaks.
"Have you reached a verdict?"
"Yes, we have.
In the matter of
People vs. Bruce Lisker,
we the jury find
the defendant..."
and they said "guilty."
And it was just...
the bottom literally fell out
of my world.
That's it.
It's over, isn't it?
It's my life.
When you've been
falsely accused,
your only hope
is for your attorney
to directly challenge
the veracity of the police.
My attorney seemed unwilling
to go that far.
"Isn't it true
that you're just lying
about all of this?
Here's the investigatory work
that I did
that proves
that you're just a liar."
And he never did that.
[Matthew] And this
is part of a larger problem
that David Sirota
calls the authority bias.
Authority bias meaning
the government, an institution
says somebody did something,
and they must've done it.
And what's strange about it
is that this is a country
that in one way
the American zeitgeist is,
"I don't trust... the government
can't do anything right.
I don't trust anything
the government says."
And yet at another level,
at the very same time
that that's the dominant
rhetorical paradigm
in our politics,
there is this authority bias
where, when the government
accuses somebody of a crime
or says somebody's a wrongdoer,
reflexively, millions
and millions of Americans
think it must be true.
- Am I free to go?
- No, you're not.
Your freedom is secondary.
You're not allowed
to be holding me.
Would you like to be placed
under arrest?
You're not allowed
to arrest me.
In the 1960s, Yale University
psychologist Stanley Milgram
ran an experiment to see how
often human beings
would obey an authority figure
and follow orders,
even if doing so
ran completely against
their personal code
of morality.
How is it possible,
I asked myself,
that ordinary people
who are courteous and decent
in everyday life
can act callously, inhumanely,
without any limitations
of conscious?
450 volts.
In Milgram's experiment,
participants were told
by a scientist in uniform
to electrocute a subject
for each wrong answer on a test
at ever increasing voltages.
Are you all right?
[man]
Please continue, teacher.
- Do I keep giving him shocks?
- Continue.
- I'm up to 390.
- Continue, please.
[buzzer buzzes]
The participants had no idea
the subjects were just actors.
And although many protested,
Milgram
found a strong majority,
over 65% of participants
would shock the subject
if instructed
by an authority figure.
- 330 volts.
- [lever clicks]
[man screams]
Let me out of here!
Let me out of here!
My heart's bothering me!
Let me out, I tell you!
Let me out of here!
You have no right
to hold me here!
Let me out! Let me out!
Let me out!
Milgram concluded
that very few people
have the psychological capacity
to resist authority.
[man] The way we have
the system set up,
the policeman's uniform,
gun at their side, the badge,
they're treated with the same
deference as our military.
It's like they're infallible.
With judges, we drape them
in robes like priests
and literally put them up
on a pedestal.
The system hierarchy,
which has almost
no real checks and balances,
no accountability...
Or transparency, is so deeply
entrenched in our culture...
We never see how flawed it is.
How do we resist
Don't blindly trust
authority figures.
If you're given an order
that feels questionable,
check your conscience.
The time to argue
with a police officer
is not the side of the road.
Pick your battles wisely.
If you can challenge authority
without risking more
than you're willing to lose
don't obey.
Don't obey
even the smallest commands
if you feel that they're wrong.
The more that we accept
and obey, the more we become
- blind followers.
- And now you're under control.
[Matthew] In a world
which is absolutely insane.
To free ourselves
from this authoritarian system
in which
we've now found ourselves
is going to take
a massive effort.
And if you're afraid, I get it.
Find an ally.
Milgram's experiment told us
there's is great
psychological power
against authoritarianism
in groups.
Unfortunately, these techniques
are not taught in school.
[Bruce] And so if you're innocent
and you find yourself in prison,
it's hard to have
any hope at all.
[Susan] A year later,
Mike Ryan robbed
and was sentenced
to six years for armed robbery.
But other than Bruce
and his father,
nobody had connected Mike Ryan
to the murder
besides other inmates
like Jeff Deskovic,
another wrongfully convicted
man trying to prove
Translation
Translate and read this script in other languages:
Select another language:
- - Select -
- 简体中文 (Chinese - Simplified)
- 繁體中文 (Chinese - Traditional)
- Español (Spanish)
- Esperanto (Esperanto)
- 日本語 (Japanese)
- Português (Portuguese)
- Deutsch (German)
- العربية (Arabic)
- Français (French)
- Русский (Russian)
- ಕನ್ನಡ (Kannada)
- 한국어 (Korean)
- עברית (Hebrew)
- Gaeilge (Irish)
- Українська (Ukrainian)
- اردو (Urdu)
- Magyar (Hungarian)
- मानक हिन्दी (Hindi)
- Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Italiano (Italian)
- தமிழ் (Tamil)
- Türkçe (Turkish)
- తెలుగు (Telugu)
- ภาษาไทย (Thai)
- Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
- Čeština (Czech)
- Polski (Polish)
- Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Românește (Romanian)
- Nederlands (Dutch)
- Ελληνικά (Greek)
- Latinum (Latin)
- Svenska (Swedish)
- Dansk (Danish)
- Suomi (Finnish)
- فارسی (Persian)
- ייִדיש (Yiddish)
- հայերեն (Armenian)
- Norsk (Norwegian)
- English (English)
Citation
Use the citation below to add this screenplay to your bibliography:
Style:MLAChicagoAPA
"Survivors Guide to Prison" Scripts.com. STANDS4 LLC, 2024. Web. 23 Dec. 2024. <https://www.scripts.com/script/survivors_guide_to_prison_19188>.
Discuss this script with the community:
Report Comment
We're doing our best to make sure our content is useful, accurate and safe.
If by any chance you spot an inappropriate comment while navigating through our website please use this form to let us know, and we'll take care of it shortly.
Attachment
You need to be logged in to favorite.
Log In