The Court-Martial of Billy Mitchell Page #8
- APPROVED
- Year:
- 1955
- 100 min
- 180 Views
to listen to her...
and to anyone else who may
have pertinent testimony.
I agree with MacArthur.
Well, I don't.
We're here to try Mitchell
for insubordination.
We're not here to listen
to a lot of wailing
about the navy...
or to hear people try to
justify his behavior.
You just said it.
We're here to try Mitchell.
And to give him a fair trial,
we have to listen
to every bit of evidence...
whether or not it's
technically called
a justification.
Did you hear
what that girl said
about theShenandoah?
Suppose other witnesses
had equally positive
testimony.
The trial would go on for weeks,
and the publicity would be bad
for everybody.
Well, that's the chance
we have to take.
The whole foundation
of our legal system
and of our country...
rests
on the right of a man
to defend himself,
on his right
to use every means
to defend himself.
He may be wrong, but
at least he's entitled
to tell his story.
And the minute
we forget that,
we're in grave danger.
I mean that, gentlemen.
Very grave danger.
I agree wholeheartedly
with General MacArthur.
Anybody else
have any thoughts?
I haven't.
No.
I think not.
Then I suggest
we vote on it.
[ Guthrie ]
Court will
come to order.
Under the 31st
Article of War,
it's the court's ruling...
that the motion to strike
Mrs. Lansdowne's testimony
is overruled...
and that the defense
may proceed with
its witnesses.
[ Spectators Chattering ]
Order in the court.
- Are your witnesses
present?
- Yes, sir.
One witness, Mr. Reid,
will not be here.
The president has declined
your kind invitation
to appear at this court.
The defense wishes
to thank Mr. Coolidge...
for his gracious
consideration
of our request.
Our other witnesses,
however, I'm sure,
will compensate
for his absence.
[ Man ]
Major Hap Arnold.
Major Arnold,
how many pilots have we lost
in peacetime flying?
The total is 517,
sir.
That is from
January 1919
to date.
How many of them
met their deaths
in modern planes?
In machines built
since the war,
To your knowledge, Major,
have there been
any recommendations...
made to the general staff
with respect to safety measures
for the air service?
Yes, sir. Dozens of them,
most of them
by Col. Mitchell.
Do you know
what became of them?
Yes, sir.
They've beenfiled.
[ Spectators Murmuring ]
Captain Rickenbacker,
will you tell the court...
how many enemy planes
you brought down
in the last war?
Yes, sir.
Twenty-six.
Approximately how many hours
did you spend flying
over enemy lines?
About 300.
Now, based on your experiences
in the World War,
I should like to ask you
three questions.
First, is it proper
to send an aviator up
without a parachute?
It's suicidal. It's like
sending a man to sea
without a life preserver.
Second, what is your opinion
of the aircraft presently
being used by our flyers?
The graveyards
around our airfields
prove their worth.
Third, do you happen to know
what the aviation rank
in comparison
with other nations?
According to the latest
information I have,
we're now in eighth place.
[ Spectators Murmuring ]
Thank you,
Capt. Rickenbacker.
Your witness.
Would it surprise you
to know, Captain,
that the latest
official reports contradict...
most of your so-called
informedstatements?
I wouldn't be surprised
at anything in the official
reports you refer to.
I would be surprised
No further questions.
Major Spaatz,
what is your present
military assignment?
I am chief of the
tactical unit section
of the training command.
Now, Major Spaatz,
can you inform this court...
as to how many planes
have for combat purposes?
Yes, sir. Nine.
But the War Department
carries on the army list
That is technically
correct, sir.
But of that number,
which are obsolete
and of little
serviceable use.
And the remaining 400?
were flown in France
in 1917...
and have not
been modified
or improved since.
And the remaining 69?
Sixty are used
for training purposes.
That leaves nine
for use against
a possible enemy.
And of that number, not one
pursuit ship is equipped
for wartime service.
So you believe the organization
of the tactical unit
of the air service...
is being retarded
by the War Department.
- I do.
-Thank you, Major.
Thank you very much.
Is it your experience,
Mr. La Guardia,
as a member of the Congress,
that younger officers
invariably want to carry out
the wishes of the general staff?
Well, let me put it
this way.
When the army testifies
before Congress,
it operates like
a self-greasing axle.
[ Spectators Laugh ]
Thank you, Congressman.
Your witness.
Mr. La Guardia, is it true
you made a speech in New York...
in which you said Col. Mitchell
is not being tried
by a jury of his peers?
- That is correct.
- By what logic do you
arrive at the conclusion...
that general officers
are not equals to Col. Mitchell?
That's easy. Their feet
are stuck in the mud.
[ Spectators Laugh ]
Not one of them has ever
flown in an airplane.
Isn't it possible, Congressman--
having flown a plane yourself--
that your judgment is clouded
by the natural sympathy
you feel...
for another man
who also flies a plane?
I have no more
natural sympathy
for an airplane pilot...
than I do for some
of my colleagues
in Congress.
[ Spectators Laugh ]
Yet you say that officers
who have never flown...
are not equals
to Col. Mitchell.
In that respect only.
It's as reasonable
to have them judge him...
as it is for you
to run for Congress.
[ Spectators Laughing ]
No further questions.
Admiral Sims, how does
handle its aircraft?
What is its policy?
Well, it has no policy.
It bumps along
from day to day.
[ Spectators Laugh ]
Does the navy
consider the airplane
a major weapon?
The Navy Department
is ignoring the airplane...
in the hope that,
if they don't notice it,
maybe it'll disappear.
[ Laughter ]
Thank you, Admiral.
Your witness.
Admiral, how do you account for
this difference of opinion...
between you and your
colleagues of the navy?
Well, they are just not
educated about the air.
Surely,
they're capable officers...
who can inform themselves
on the problems of aviation.
Reading a lot of golf books
doesn't make a man
a good golf player.
[ Laughter ]
As I understand it, Admiral, you
are no longer in active service.
- Is that right?
- Yes, sir.
I am retired.
myself, and I'd like to tell
this court one thing, sir.
This row on air power
is not a row between
the army and navy.
It is a clash between
men who love to fly
and men who don't,
men who think
in terms of air power...
and men who can't
think at all.
Col. Moreland,
this Mitchell business
is getting out of hand.
It looks as though
he's put the army on trial.
Mr. President, the army
Translation
Translate and read this script in other languages:
Select another language:
- - Select -
- 简体中文 (Chinese - Simplified)
- 繁體中文 (Chinese - Traditional)
- Español (Spanish)
- Esperanto (Esperanto)
- 日本語 (Japanese)
- Português (Portuguese)
- Deutsch (German)
- العربية (Arabic)
- Français (French)
- Русский (Russian)
- ಕನ್ನಡ (Kannada)
- 한국어 (Korean)
- עברית (Hebrew)
- Gaeilge (Irish)
- Українська (Ukrainian)
- اردو (Urdu)
- Magyar (Hungarian)
- मानक हिन्दी (Hindi)
- Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Italiano (Italian)
- தமிழ் (Tamil)
- Türkçe (Turkish)
- తెలుగు (Telugu)
- ภาษาไทย (Thai)
- Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
- Čeština (Czech)
- Polski (Polish)
- Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Românește (Romanian)
- Nederlands (Dutch)
- Ελληνικά (Greek)
- Latinum (Latin)
- Svenska (Swedish)
- Dansk (Danish)
- Suomi (Finnish)
- فارسی (Persian)
- ייִדיש (Yiddish)
- հայերեն (Armenian)
- Norsk (Norwegian)
- English (English)
Citation
Use the citation below to add this screenplay to your bibliography:
Style:MLAChicagoAPA
"The Court-Martial of Billy Mitchell" Scripts.com. STANDS4 LLC, 2024. Web. 22 Nov. 2024. <https://www.scripts.com/script/the_court-martial_of_billy_mitchell_5988>.
Discuss this script with the community:
Report Comment
We're doing our best to make sure our content is useful, accurate and safe.
If by any chance you spot an inappropriate comment while navigating through our website please use this form to let us know, and we'll take care of it shortly.
Attachment
You need to be logged in to favorite.
Log In