The Day Before Disclosure Page #9

---

get local news coverage,

but that doesn't mean

that it gets covered

on the wire services.

That's a very different

situation altogether.

Skeptics will argue,

well this phenomenon

is so big, it

would've been covered.

But really what that betrays

is a lack of understanding

of how news media

has been related

to intelligence communities

around the world for decades.

- And I call upon our

government to open up,

like other governments have,

and you'll hear about

that this morning.

- [Terje] When CNN

covered a press conference

in Washington D.C. in 2009,

where Dr. Edgar Mitchell

encouraged U.S. government

to release its UFO files,

the hope was that

the issue finally

was given serious news coverage.

- [Reporter] Former Apollo

astronaut, Edgar Mitchell,

the sixth man to

walk on the moon,

told the National Press

Club he's convinced.

But there isn't

convincing proof that's

gonna convince the entire

world at this point.

- That is correct, that is

what we're trying to open up.

- We're about to go

out do our little hoax.

- [Terje] But CNN

chose to let two boys

with air balloons have just

as much time in the report,

demonstrating how they

managed to fool UFO believers.

- Again, we're not trying to

prove or disprove anything,

but it's okay to be skeptical.

- (chuckling) Okay then.

Jim, thank you very

much indeed for that.

Jim Acosta there.

- You bet.

- Well the role of the media

in the flying saucer phenomenon

is a very, very important one.

I think it's very clear

that, in the United States

at the very least,

that there were efforts

during the very earliest

days to try to get the media

to basically dampen

down expectations

and dampen down

public enthusiasm

concerning extraterrestrial life

and the flying

saucer phenomenon.

And this is actually documented.

And ever since that we have

seen many, many examples

of how the media

doesn't really explore

or doesn't really investigate

flying saucer reports

and that various media

organs have been bought out

by the CIA, for example,

the National Enquirer

was actually bought

out by a CIA asset,

who used it as a very clever way

to debunk flying saucer reports

by basically sensationalizing

it, making it part

of a kind of tabloid media,

whereby serious media

investigators would not

do any research into

a flying saucer report

that had been in any way,

covered by the National Enquirer

or these tabloids.

So that was a very clever

piece of psychological warfare

in my opinion to try

and get the mass media

disinterested in the

flying saucer phenomenon.

- So it's a very,

very complex issue.

The secrecy isn't

that hard to maintain

if you have this

sort of infiltration

into major institutions, media.

And also the ability simply

to float nonsensical

stories out there,

because people hear the word

UFO and extraterrestrial,

they think somebody from a

trailer park in West Virginia,

who's floated onboard a

spacecraft, had sex with someone

from Mars, and claims they

have a baby in an incubator.

Or you know, just all

kinds of nonsense.

The truth of it is

actually more interesting.

The truth of the

technologies and the fact

that the extraterrestrial

technologies

are so advanced that

they interface directly

with coherent thought.

Like we have coherent

light in a laser,

the have technologies that

interface with thought,

that interface with

conscious mind.

The development of

artificial intelligence

that's integrated

into these spacecraft

is so advanced that they

pick up on a directed...

It's fascinating and

this is what we've

been experimenting with

and the whole paradigm

becomes a new paradigm

of understanding the

structure of the cosmos.

But most of the information

that's out in the public

on this issue has been

a carnival of silliness.

And that keeps

most serious people

sort of in the closet on it.

- [Terje] Is this the

reason why so few scientists

engage in the UFO subject?

The fear of being associated

with the silly

side of the issue.

Is this also why it's

never commented on

by astronomers or by space

organizations such as NASA.

- This is not just a simple

civilian organization.

There's a great military

connection there

and there's a lot of

classified security clearances

involved in being

able to work at NASA.

You can't just stroll in there.

So these are people who fit a

certain personality profile.

That is, they know

how to follow orders,

they know how to keep

their mouth shut,

and keep their head down and

their career will do just fine.

That's how most people are who

live in a bureaucratic world.

This is how secrets are kept.

There are open

secrets that are kept

for years and years and years.

Because people agree just

not to talk about it.

And I think that within NASA

this is very likely the case

regarding the UFO issue.

- [Terje] But like

Dr. Edgar Mitchell,

people retired from NASA

have commented on the issue.

Astronaut Gordon Cooper has

told the world straight out

about encountering

a UFO at close range

during his flight in the

Mercury capsule in 1963.

And before he died,

he also stated,

"For many years I have

lived with a secret,

"in a secrecy imposed on all

specialists in astronautics.

"I can now reveal that

every day, in the USA,

"our radar instruments

capture objects of form

"and composition unknown to us."

- I would like to

believe that we could

invite serious scientists

into this arena,

because it will be changing

the paradigm of science

as we know it.

We know that these

craft are not traveling

with fossil fuel gas,

that there is a technology

behind them, that

maybe this technology

could help the earth

in renewable fuels.

If we could get scientists

just to use that motivation

to look at the technology

behind the craft,

then maybe we could

invite science to come

and change the paradigm of,

of transportation,

of electromagnetism,

of all these really

advanced technologies.

But we need to invite them.

I think too many are

afraid of ridicule.

Too many, I have encountered

many that are curious,

but are not willing

to go public.

So we're changing times now.

And for the sake of our

children, our grandchildren,

and the future, some

scientists are going to have

to take the risk.

- Well, it's my hope that

we open this whole issue up

and as I have said frequently,

we're at a point in

history where we have

to become a part of

the neighborhood of

inhabited planets,

rather like a neighborhood

of a community,

which we have not

even acknowledged

that that community exists

up until this point.

(eerie horn music)

- [Terje] An event

with the power

to institute a global

revolution in technology,

communications, energy supply,

environmental concerns,

and even the way we regard

ourselves and our fellow beings.

A paradigm shift of

unprecedented proportions

impacting nearly every

part of our existence,

Rate this script:0.0 / 0 votes