The Great Global Warming Swindle Page #4
- Year:
- 2007
- 74 min
- 952 Views
so for example if somebody says:
"Oh, I'm seeing changes
in the North Atlantic,
...this must mean that the
climate system is changing",
it may only mean that
something happened...
...in a remote part of the ocean
decades or hundreds of years ago
whose effects are now beginning
to show up in the North Atlantic.
The current warming
began long...
...before people had cars
or electric lights.
In the past 150 years,
the temperature has risen
just over half a degree celsius.
But most of that rise
occurred before 1940.
Since that time, the
temperature...
has fallen for four decades,
and risen for three.
There's no evidence at all...
...from Earth's long
climate history...
...that CO2 has ever determined
global temperatures.
But if CO2 doesn't drive
Earth's climate, what does?
is at odds with much of
the available scientific data.
Data from weather
balloons and satellites,
the historical temperature records.
But if CO2 isn't driving climate,
what is?
Isn't it bizarre the thing
that it's humans,
you know when we're filling apart car,
turning on our lights,
that we are the ones
controlling climate?
Just look in the sky, look at
that massive thing, the Sun.
Even humans, at
our present 6.5 billion
In the late 1980's, solar physicist
Piers Corbin decided to try...
a radically new way of
forecasting the weather.
Despite the huge resources
of the official Met Office,
Corbin's new technique consistently
produced more accurate results;
He was held in the national press
as the super weatherman.
The secret of his success
was the Sun.
The origin of solar weather technique
of long range forecasting...
came originally from study of sunspots
and the desire to predict those,
...and then I realized there was
actually much more interest in...
...to use the Sun to
predict the weather.
Sunspots, we now know,
are intense magnetic fields...
...which appear at times
But for many hundreds of years,
long before this was
properly understood,
the astronomers around
the world used to count...
...the number of
sunspots in the belief,,,
...that more spots
heralded warmer weather.
In 1893 the British astronomer
Edward Maunder observed...
that during the Little Ice Age
there were barely
...the Maunder Minimum.
But how reliable are sunspots
as an indicator of the weather?
I decided to test it by gambling
on the weather through William Hill,
against what the Met Office
said was, you know,
a normal expectation.
month after month after month.
Last winter the Met Office
said it could be...
...or would be an
exceptionally cold winter;
We said:
"no, that is nonsense,it's gonna be close to normal"
and we specifically said
when it would be cold,
after Christmas and February:
we were right, they were wrong.
In 1991, senior scientists of the
Danish Meteorological Institute
decided to compile a record
of sunspots in the 20th century...
and compare it with the
temperature record.
What they found, was an
incredibly close correlation...
between what the
Sun was doing...
and changes in temperature
on Earth.
Solar activity they found
rose sharply to 1940,
fell back for four decades
until the 1970's...
...and then rose again after that.
When we saw this correlation...
between the temperature and
solar activity or sunspot cyclings,
then the people said to us:
"OK, it can be just a coincidence",
so how can we prove that
it's not just a coincidence?
to have a longer timeseries...
...or different timeseries
and we went back in time.
So Professor Friis Christensen
and his colleagues examined...
...four hundreds years
of astronomical records...
to compare sunspot activity...
...against temperature variation.
Once again, they found...
that variations in solar activity...
were intimate linked...
...to temperature
variation on Earth.
It was the Sun, it seemed,
not CO2, or anything else,
that was driving changes
in the climate.
In a way, it's not surprising:
the Sun affects us directly...
...of course when it
sends down its heat.
But we now know...
the Sun also affects
indirectly through clouds.
Clouds have a powerful cooling effect,
but how are they formed?
In the early 20th century
scientists discovered that...
the Earth was constantly
being bombarded...
...by subatomic particles.
These particles, which
originated (it was believed)
from exploding supernovae,
When the particles coming down
up from the sea,
they form water droplets
and make clouds.
But when the Sun
is more active...
and the solar wind is strong,
fewer particles get through
Just how powerful
this effect was,
became clear only recently,
when an astrophysicist,
Professor Nir Shaviv...
...decided to compare
his own record...
of cloud-forming
cosmic rays...
with the temperature record
created by a geologist,
Professor Jan Veizer...
...going back six hundred
million years.
What they found was that
when cosmic rays went up,
...the temperature went down;
when cosmic rays went down,
the temperature went up.
Clouds and the Earth's climate
were wery closely linked.
To see how close,
you just flip the lines.
We just compared the graph,
just put them one upon the other
and it was just amazing
and Jan Veizer looked at me and said you know,
We have very explosive data here.
I've never seen such a
vastly different records...
coming together
so beautifully...
to show really what's happening
over that long period of time.
The climate was controlled
by the clouds.
The clouds were controlled
by cosmic rays,
and the cosmic rays were
controlled by the Sun.
It all came down to the Sun.
If you had X-ray eyes
what appears as a nice
friendly yellow ball...
...would appear like a raging tiger.
The Sun is an incredibly
violent beast...
..and is raying out great
explosions...
and puffs of gas...
that's forever rushing
past the Earth.
There, in a certain sense,
inside the atmosphere
of the Sun...
the intensity of its magnetic
field...
more than doubled...
...during the 20th century.
In 2005, astrophysicists
from Harvard University...
published the following graph...
in the official Journal of the
American Geophysical Union:
The blue line represents
temperature change...
in the Arctic over the
past hundred years...
and here is the rising CO2
over the same period.
The two are not
obviously connected.
But now look again at
the temperature record...
and at this red line...
which depicts variations
in solar activity...
over the past century as recorded
Translation
Translate and read this script in other languages:
Select another language:
- - Select -
- 简体中文 (Chinese - Simplified)
- 繁體中文 (Chinese - Traditional)
- Español (Spanish)
- Esperanto (Esperanto)
- 日本語 (Japanese)
- Português (Portuguese)
- Deutsch (German)
- العربية (Arabic)
- Français (French)
- Русский (Russian)
- ಕನ್ನಡ (Kannada)
- 한국어 (Korean)
- עברית (Hebrew)
- Gaeilge (Irish)
- Українська (Ukrainian)
- اردو (Urdu)
- Magyar (Hungarian)
- मानक हिन्दी (Hindi)
- Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Italiano (Italian)
- தமிழ் (Tamil)
- Türkçe (Turkish)
- తెలుగు (Telugu)
- ภาษาไทย (Thai)
- Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
- Čeština (Czech)
- Polski (Polish)
- Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Românește (Romanian)
- Nederlands (Dutch)
- Ελληνικά (Greek)
- Latinum (Latin)
- Svenska (Swedish)
- Dansk (Danish)
- Suomi (Finnish)
- فارسی (Persian)
- ייִדיש (Yiddish)
- հայերեն (Armenian)
- Norsk (Norwegian)
- English (English)
Citation
Use the citation below to add this screenplay to your bibliography:
Style:MLAChicagoAPA
"The Great Global Warming Swindle" Scripts.com. STANDS4 LLC, 2024. Web. 23 Nov. 2024. <https://www.scripts.com/script/the_great_global_warming_swindle_9303>.
Discuss this script with the community:
Report Comment
We're doing our best to make sure our content is useful, accurate and safe.
If by any chance you spot an inappropriate comment while navigating through our website please use this form to let us know, and we'll take care of it shortly.
Attachment
You need to be logged in to favorite.
Log In