The Post Page #10
- PG-13
- Year:
- 2017
- 116 min
- $80,369,969
- 5,403 Views
that the newspaper
will be dedicated
to the welfare of the nation
and to the, uh...
principles of a free press.
Yes, but...
So,
one could argue
that the bankers
were put on notice.
But Kay, these are
extraordinary circumstances.
Are they? Are they?
For a newspaper?
One that covers the
Nixon White House?
Can you guarantee me that
we could go to print
without endangering
any of our soldiers--
You can't be considering--
I'm talking to Mr. Bradlee now.
Fritz, you're not gonna let
her do this, she can't--
Oh, no, she can, Arthur.
And it's entirely her decision.
Kay, you're allowing Mr. Bradlee
to uh, t-t-to lead you to folly.
The legacy of the
company is at stake.
-And if you want to
-Arthur.
protect that legacy,
This company has been in my life
for longer than most of the people
working there have been alive
so I don't need the
lecture on legacy.
And this is no longer
my father's company.
It's no longer my
husband's company.
It's my company.
And anyone who thinks otherwise
probably doesn't
belong on my board.
Can you guarantee
me that we--
One hundred percent.
All right then.
My decision stands.
And I'm
going to bed.
It's Ben Bradlee.
Run it.
Yes, sir.
Start it up.
Here we go.
Let's go! Let's go!
More here!
I've got the Assistant
Attorney General.
Put him on.
Good morning.
Good morning, this
is William Rehnquist
from the office of legal
counsel at Justice.
Yes, sir.
Mr. Bradlee, I have been advised
by the Secretary of Defense
that the material published in
The Washington Post this morning
contains the
information relating
to the national defense
of the United States
and bears a top secret
classification.
As such the publication
of this information
is directly prohibited
by the Espionage Act,
Title 18 of the
United States Code,
Section 793.
As publication will cause
irreparable injury
to the defense interests
of the United States,
I respectfully request that
you publish no further
information of this character.
And advise me that you
have made arrangements
for the return of
these documents
to the Department of Defense.
Well, thank you for the call,
Mr. Rehnquist.
But I'm sure you understand,
I must respectfully decline.
I appreciate your time.
What's next?
We're going to court.
Today.
If we get a ruling in our
favor or The Times does,
we'll be at the Supreme
Court sometime next week.
We're focusing on Johnson.
I don't want any more arguments,
it's about shoes and about dresses.
Sorry.
Your Honor, the stories
published in The Times
and now The Post have created a
diplomatic and security disaster
for the United States.
created a diplomatic disaster?
talk to us in confidence
if secrets like these
can be leaked?
So, does this make it difficult
for the President to govern?
If the President can't keep
secrets, he can't govern.
Nothing less than the integrity
of the presidency is at stake.
Yes, I know.
I'm sure it has rattled
investors, Terry.
That's why I'm calling you.
Yes, I understand a number of
them have considered pulling out
but we feel...
Of course. I stand
behind the decision.
Well, you know,
raising the profile of The Post.
Would The Post have published
military plans for D-Day
if they'd had them in advance?
Well, I don't think
there's any comparison
between a pending
invasion of Europe
and a historical survey of American
involvement in the Vietnam war.
The Supreme Court has decided to
hold a hearing tomorrow morning
conflicting decisions
over what of the Pentagon
papers can be published
and more broadly, the issue
of freedom of the press
versus government security.
But in agreeing
to hear the cases
of The New York Times and
The Washington Post--
emergency expedited basis--
We're in court with
The Times tomorrow.
What are you so happy about?
of a small rebellion.
I ask him what he considers the
most important revelations to date
from the Pentagon documents.
people of this country
can't afford to let the President
run the country by himself--
more than domestic affairs
without the help of Congress.
I was struck in fact by
President Johnson's reaction
to these revelations
as close to treason.
Because it reflected
to me the sense
that what was damaging
to the reputation
of a particular administration--
a particular individual
was, in itself, treason
which is very close to saying,
"I am The State."
Ben.
What on Earth are you doing?
Oh.
Oh.
They all followed your lead,
published the papers.
At least we're not alone.
No matter what happens tomorrow,
we are not a little
local paper anymore.
Hm.
I'm sorry.
Mrs. Graham, there's an entrance
over on the side for the appellates.
Oh, thank you very much.
I'm sorry I'm walking so fast.
I was supposed to be
here half hour ago
but then I had to make
copies of the brief
and there was so
much traffic and I
just wouldn't think there'd
be all these people.
Well, no, you wouldn't.
You work for Roger Clark, then?
I work for the government.
the Solicitor General's office.
Oh, you're on the other team.
Mrs. Graham,
I probably shouldn't say this.
Um...my brother...
he's still over there.
And...
Well, I hope you win.
Besides, I like someone telling
these guys what's what.
But don't tell my
boss I said that.
He'd fire me just
for talking to you.
I told you to be here at 8:00.
Yes, I was here at 8:00,
but Richard sent me back.
Is Richard your boss?
No, but you weren't here, so--
I don't want excuses.
Just take a seat.
-Mrs. Graham.
-Morning.
Morning, gentlemen.
-Morning.
-Punch, Ed.
Nice to be on the same side
for a change.
I'll tell you what's nice.
Making the front page of your
newspaper on the daily basis.
Must be a lot of people from Boston
to Washington reading about us.
Yes, well, I suppose
it's appropriate
given what's at stake.
All rise.
The Honorable the Chief Justice
and the Associate Justices
of the Supreme Court
of the United States.
All yea, all yea, all yea.
before the Honorable...
Mr. Rosenthal! Mr. Rosenthal!
Sulzberger!
Sulzberger, do you think
they'll side to your favor?
Overall we feel encouraged.
27 congressmen filed amicus
briefs on our behalf.
As well as the ACLU...
-We should make a statement.
-I think that's her job.
I believe everything we had
to say we've already said.
Meg Greenfield.
Okay.
Everyone, listen up!
Listen up.
We've got a decision.
We've got a decision.
The Supreme Court,
the decision's in.
The vote is...
Six to three...
Six to three, we win!
We win!
And so does The Times!
Whoo!
Yes!
No sh*t.
Nice job, Gene.
Whoo!
-No gloating.
-I'm just satisfied.
What?
I can't hear you, it's too loud.
Translation
Translate and read this script in other languages:
Select another language:
- - Select -
- 简体中文 (Chinese - Simplified)
- 繁體中文 (Chinese - Traditional)
- Español (Spanish)
- Esperanto (Esperanto)
- 日本語 (Japanese)
- Português (Portuguese)
- Deutsch (German)
- العربية (Arabic)
- Français (French)
- Русский (Russian)
- ಕನ್ನಡ (Kannada)
- 한국어 (Korean)
- עברית (Hebrew)
- Gaeilge (Irish)
- Українська (Ukrainian)
- اردو (Urdu)
- Magyar (Hungarian)
- मानक हिन्दी (Hindi)
- Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Italiano (Italian)
- தமிழ் (Tamil)
- Türkçe (Turkish)
- తెలుగు (Telugu)
- ภาษาไทย (Thai)
- Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
- Čeština (Czech)
- Polski (Polish)
- Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Românește (Romanian)
- Nederlands (Dutch)
- Ελληνικά (Greek)
- Latinum (Latin)
- Svenska (Swedish)
- Dansk (Danish)
- Suomi (Finnish)
- فارسی (Persian)
- ייִדיש (Yiddish)
- հայերեն (Armenian)
- Norsk (Norwegian)
- English (English)
Citation
Use the citation below to add this screenplay to your bibliography:
Style:MLAChicagoAPA
"The Post" Scripts.com. STANDS4 LLC, 2024. Web. 19 Nov. 2024. <https://www.scripts.com/script/the_post_21092>.
Discuss this script with the community:
Report Comment
We're doing our best to make sure our content is useful, accurate and safe.
If by any chance you spot an inappropriate comment while navigating through our website please use this form to let us know, and we'll take care of it shortly.
Attachment
You need to be logged in to favorite.
Log In