The Real Eve Page #4
- Year:
- 2002
- 103 min
- 1,375 Views
they belonged to that group...
we need to look at their genetic
lines. The mitochondrial DNA...
will tell us whether or not
they come straight out of...
the two daughters of Eve
that originated just outside Africa.
If they have their own
unique lines that suggests...
they've been isolated since
that time, 70 or 80,000 years ago.
And that they have developed
completely on their own.
If on the other hand, we might even
find that their lines are ancestral...
to people further down the line, like
the Australians or the New Guineans.
Again, our genetic tracing will
help us to see if that's the case.
the Semang are an ancient race...
but it can't tell us exactly
when they were here.
We have to look for other
evidence to validate the theory.
These crude tools were found in a
wooded valley called Kota Tampan...
near Penang. There are other sites
nearby with the same sort of tools.
What makes these so interesting
is that they are embedded...
in a fall of Toba ash
dated 74,000 years ago.
looking for an ancient river terrace...
when she stumbled upon
the Kota Tampan site.
What Professor Najeek had actually
found was a stone tool workshop...
which could be pinpointed
to 74,000 years ago.
The ash covered
the working floor.
That ash has been dated
to 74,000 years ago.
This is a hammer stone
that they used...
and you can see that it's very
comfortable to hold it in the hand.
And this is the edge
that was used.
This is a chopper.
A type that is seen
in a lot of Asia...
and Southeast Asia.
What they were after
was the edge angle.
The edge angle
had to be right...
and the edge had to be sharp.
This was used for heavy-duty work.
It's heavy, it's got a sharp edge...
probably for felling trees.
Najeek is convinced that
they were left by modern man.
Kota Tampan also revealed
man who had a complex mind.
His total technology
reveals a rational...
systematic and
organized mind.
The mind of Homo-sapiens.
These Kota Tampan tools
are crucial...
for the dating of modern man's
presence in Southeast Asia.
They're the first tangible evidence
we have of the whole journey...
from Africa to Australia. Combined
with Steven Oppenheimer's...
genetic tests, they could be real
proof of our ancient migration.
Has he found the
evidence he needs?
For the first time, archeology and
genetics gives us the same answer...
at this crucial point
in our journey.
Now we can be sure our ancestors
came this way 74,000 years ago.
The results are very exciting.
The 0rang Asli...
have their own...
unique genetic lines
which suggest...
that they may have been in that
first trip 75,000 years ago.
They have their
own unique lines...
coming out of the first
two daughters of Eve outside Africa.
And they trace right back there, and
are not shared with anyone else...
in Southeast Asia
or in East Asia.
At that time, the sea levels
were 160 feet lower.
Most of the islands of Southeast
Asia were joined together...
into the single landmass
of the Sunda continent.
The survivors of the volcanic winter
would take our genetic journey...
onto its next great move,
the unknown continent of Australia.
100 miles of shark-infested sea
separated them from the new land.
This is the second great exodus
in the migration of mankind.
But this time there are no
green hills in the Yemen...
to give them the comfort
of a safe arrival.
Why did they risk all
on such a dangerous venture...
not even knowing if they would
make landfall at the end?
Some scientists believe
they were blown off course...
and arrived in the
unknown shore accidentally.
But new clues from the
genetic evidence says no.
It shows that Australian aborigines
have a number of genetic lines...
unique only to them, leading straight
back to the first daughters...
of our new Out of Africa Eve.
So many lines,
carried by so many women...
arriving in such a short time
suggest deliberate intention...
not accidental raft raid.
70,000 years ago.
More followed
over the next 5,000 years.
All descendants
of our Out of Africa Eve.
These were the first people to walk
on this vast and empty continent.
They would stay undisturbed
for thousands of years.
The Australia they entered
was home to giant creatures...
megafauna, 3 meter high kangaroos
and tortoises as big as cars.
The cave of this vanished world
has been dated to 61,000 years ago.
But suddenly,
10,000 years later...
this fantastical creature and all
the other megafauna were extinct.
The climate didn't alter. There are
no sites indicating over-hunting.
wherever they are.
This sudden extinction
is evidence of their presence.
destroyed the leafy habitat...
with fire and the larger plant-eating
animals simply died away.
This dry lakebed is one of the places
where the theory might fall apart...
in spite of the matching
of archeology and genes...
back up on the trail
in Malaysia.
Mungo Man 3.
When he was found, the earth around
him was dated 62,000 years old.
When the bones were tested
for DNA, sensationally...
anywhere in the world.
To those who don't believe
in the Out of Africa theory...
this seems to be proof
that modern humans...
had evolved at different times
and at different places in the world...
into the people we are today.
But other scientists, like Professor
Chris Stringer, are doubtful.
There are many problems in extracting
DNA from a skeleton 60,000 years old.
the DNA that's been picked up...
is contamination, we're not sure.
But even if it's genuine DNA...
other analyses have shown that
it can reasonably be derived...
from an 0ut of Africa ancestor
just as the rest of us can.
So, in my view, the Mungo evidence
both from the bones...
and from the DNA,
if it's genuine...
still supports a recent African
origin for our species.
Australian aborigines
are an ancient people.
But they no longer look like
their ancestors...
who arrived all those
thousands of years ago.
Their bodies adapted, retaining the
characteristics needed to survive...
as hunter-gatherers
in the harsh desert environment.
Under the skin,
we are all very much alike.
from one very small gene pool.
If we look at the DNA of all of us,
Australians, Africans...
Europeans, we find that comparing
the mitochondrial DNA of all of us...
we show less variation, even though
we're spread over the whole world...
we show less variation in the
mitochondrial DNA than we'd find...
in a small group of chimpanzees
or orangutans or gorillas.
Those apes show more variation,
But if all the people from
around the world...
descend from such
a small gene pool...
Translation
Translate and read this script in other languages:
Select another language:
- - Select -
- 简体中文 (Chinese - Simplified)
- 繁體中文 (Chinese - Traditional)
- Español (Spanish)
- Esperanto (Esperanto)
- 日本語 (Japanese)
- Português (Portuguese)
- Deutsch (German)
- العربية (Arabic)
- Français (French)
- Русский (Russian)
- ಕನ್ನಡ (Kannada)
- 한국어 (Korean)
- עברית (Hebrew)
- Gaeilge (Irish)
- Українська (Ukrainian)
- اردو (Urdu)
- Magyar (Hungarian)
- मानक हिन्दी (Hindi)
- Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Italiano (Italian)
- தமிழ் (Tamil)
- Türkçe (Turkish)
- తెలుగు (Telugu)
- ภาษาไทย (Thai)
- Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
- Čeština (Czech)
- Polski (Polish)
- Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Românește (Romanian)
- Nederlands (Dutch)
- Ελληνικά (Greek)
- Latinum (Latin)
- Svenska (Swedish)
- Dansk (Danish)
- Suomi (Finnish)
- فارسی (Persian)
- ייִדיש (Yiddish)
- հայերեն (Armenian)
- Norsk (Norwegian)
- English (English)
Citation
Use the citation below to add this screenplay to your bibliography:
Style:MLAChicagoAPA
"The Real Eve" Scripts.com. STANDS4 LLC, 2024. Web. 22 Nov. 2024. <https://www.scripts.com/script/the_real_eve_21166>.
Discuss this script with the community:
Report Comment
We're doing our best to make sure our content is useful, accurate and safe.
If by any chance you spot an inappropriate comment while navigating through our website please use this form to let us know, and we'll take care of it shortly.
Attachment
You need to be logged in to favorite.
Log In