The Revisionaries Page #5
as you go up those...
from old rock layers
to new ones,
all of a sudden, something appears.
Stasis is just the term
that it's equal.
It just stays the same,
and when it disappears,
it's still the same.
And that's just a fact
in the fossil record.
OK, the question is...
Mr. Chairman, I...
Now, we're taking the vote.
We call... the vote... I'm sorry.
I'm gonna abstain from this vote.
I haven't had a chance to...
OK, that's fine. OK.
I think you need to use your brain.
You make a decision:
'yes or no', or you abstain.
We need to do it,
do it thoughtfully,
but the time comes for leadership,
and sometimes
that leadership means
you just have to make a choice.
We'll take a recorded vote on this.
So 13 'yesses' and 2 'nos'.
The motion passes.
I would like to thank
That is wonderful.
It covers the words...
'sudden appearance and stasis'
which is in the data.
It's probably a lot better
than the standard I wrote.
Thank you.
...any further amendments...
It's really disappointing
to see this happen,
because the standards
that the Board of Education
Got from the writing comittees...
were pretty decent
when it came to evolution,
And they've just amended
the dickens out of them,
And now we've got standards
that are very distinctly
compromised
in the creationist direction.
- thanks for all your work.
- you bet.
- thank you so much.
what this means is that
there's gonna be pressure
on the publishers
to put this
into the textbooks.
And that's too bad,
'cause that doesn't help
the science education
of kids in Texas very much.
The way I would understand it,
if I can speak for the other
Board members who changed their votes.
They were trying to balance
these two key demands.
They had
this pro-evolutionist side
that said this language
was unscientific.
They had this other side
that said,
"we want you to support
the strengths and weaknesses".
So they came up with a compromise.
They got rid of the bad language,
And, therefore, they voted
to support the new standards.
Frankly, it was great.
It was a failure of strategy
of the... of Eugenie Scott's,
what it was.
And Kathy Miller.
d... that's along the way
d So faith, hope, and charity d
You've been quoted as saying
That's my personal belief.
You said:
I disagree with these experts.
Someone has to stand up to them.
Scientific consensus
means nothing.
Do you at least get
that you're a point
of significant controversy
in the state of Texas?
Oh, absolutely.
And I think
you need to have a Board
that's willing
to take some controversy
and to make
some controversial decisions.
I'm embarrassed by that.
I'm embarrassed that I said it.
I wished I hadn't said that.
Can you perceive how that
might create controversy?
Can you see?
I agree.
You said education
is too important
not to be politicized.
but the only reason
I got involved in education
is because I see all children
as created in God's image.
d How do I know?
Isn't that a cool song?
very fairly.
I find him very congenial
as a person.
And he has always been,
I think,
fair in conducting
all the public testimony
in public hearings.
What I find objectionable
is the conflict between
his ethical responsibility
to foster the letter
and spirit of the law
and his personal conviction
that evolution has never happened
And that the belief in
evolution is atheistic.
Leaders must lead.
And Dr. Mcleroy
has proven conclusively
that he is less concerned
with leading the Board
than he is
with fighting the battle.
Members, let's leave him
to his battle,
and let's request the Governor
find a true leader
to chair the Texas
Board of Education.
Now here come certain preachers
on radio and TV and in the mail,
telling us,
on a bunch of political issues,
that there's just one
Christian position.
And implying, if we don't agree,
we're not good Christians.
My problem is I know my boy's
as good a Christian as me.
My wife... she's better.
So maybe there's something
wrong when people, even preachers
good Christians or bad Christians,
depending on their political views.
That's not the American way.
provided an opportunity
for what we now call
special interest groups
to come forward
and take their views and apply
them to the textbook process.
And of course
the most famous people
were Mel and Norma Gabler
from Longview.
They set up a foundation
and hired people to go through
every submitted textbook
and look for errors of either
fact or interpretation.
Humanism is prevalent
in our textbooks
from cover to cover,
in all grades and all subjects.
The Gablers were
tremendously influential.
And, as they were probably
at the peak of their influence
with the Board, into Texas comes
'People for the American Way'.
Those little tips on end...
- Right.
That's all that's proven fact.
Science rests on doubt.
Creationism rests on faith.
That is a major difference
between science and religion.
You are not interested in science.
I am absolu...
I want scientific evidence
to be shown, and if you're...
There is no scientific evidence
to disprove the theory of evolution.
...plenty of scientific evidence
which will disprove it. For instance...
if you had scientific evidence
to disprove the theory of evolution.
They've been critiquing
textbooks since 1961.
And because of the bizarre
provision in Texas law
they were basically the only people
that were able to come in
and critique the books.
And thus,
and the publishers
were almost captives
of the Gablers and their
fundamentalist allies.
In pointing out
what is going on here in Texas
with this organized effort
to restrict what goes into textbooks
and restrict
which textbooks are selected,
this not just a Texas phenomenon.
It may be more apparent here
but the same type of thing
is going on in Iowa and Ohio
New York and other places.
The Gablers who operate
here in Texas
and are very influential
sell their reviews, their critiques
of books all over the country.
Since the Moral Majority under Falwell
and then Pat Robertson's
Christian Coalition
issues of education and what
across the country have been
a central focus
for culture warriors on the right.
If you truly, truly follow
there's no way you can look at
education as not being important.
And it's kind of the viewpoint
that I've said, you know,
Abraham Lincoln was credited
with saying that
the philosophy of the
schoolroom in one generation
will become the philosophy of
the government in the next.
Liberty University is very young.
Translation
Translate and read this script in other languages:
Select another language:
- - Select -
- 简体中文 (Chinese - Simplified)
- 繁體中文 (Chinese - Traditional)
- Español (Spanish)
- Esperanto (Esperanto)
- 日本語 (Japanese)
- Português (Portuguese)
- Deutsch (German)
- العربية (Arabic)
- Français (French)
- Русский (Russian)
- ಕನ್ನಡ (Kannada)
- 한국어 (Korean)
- עברית (Hebrew)
- Gaeilge (Irish)
- Українська (Ukrainian)
- اردو (Urdu)
- Magyar (Hungarian)
- मानक हिन्दी (Hindi)
- Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Italiano (Italian)
- தமிழ் (Tamil)
- Türkçe (Turkish)
- తెలుగు (Telugu)
- ภาษาไทย (Thai)
- Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
- Čeština (Czech)
- Polski (Polish)
- Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Românește (Romanian)
- Nederlands (Dutch)
- Ελληνικά (Greek)
- Latinum (Latin)
- Svenska (Swedish)
- Dansk (Danish)
- Suomi (Finnish)
- فارسی (Persian)
- ייִדיש (Yiddish)
- հայերեն (Armenian)
- Norsk (Norwegian)
- English (English)
Citation
Use the citation below to add this screenplay to your bibliography:
Style:MLAChicagoAPA
"The Revisionaries" Scripts.com. STANDS4 LLC, 2024. Web. 13 Nov. 2024. <https://www.scripts.com/script/the_revisionaries_21200>.
Discuss this script with the community:
Report Comment
We're doing our best to make sure our content is useful, accurate and safe.
If by any chance you spot an inappropriate comment while navigating through our website please use this form to let us know, and we'll take care of it shortly.
Attachment
You need to be logged in to favorite.
Log In