The Revisionaries Page #8
into heaven and we say:
"on this day Your kingdom come,
Your will be done in
public education once again".
We draw the line in the sand today.
And we say, no more.
Lord, I ask that You would
invade our schools.
Invade our country.
Invade our homes.
Invade our churches
with Your presence,
that we would
truly be hunger
for righteousness
and for truth.
Because truth is not a thing.
It is a person.
And it is the person
of Jesus Christ.
And Your word tells us
that if You be lifted up,
You will draw
all men unto you.
And so, God,
that's what we do right now.
We repent on behalf
of our nation.
We repent on behalf of ourselves
and our families, God.
And we lift You up.
And we want
to see you exalted, God.
In Jesus' name, we pray,
Amen.
[applause]
Amen!
As we're here
at the Lincoln Memorial,
I think it's very fitting.
I think ours is the
greatest nation on earth,
and I think that the framework
of a Constitutional Republic
that our founders crafted
is brilliant
and has preserved for us
the greatest protection
of our liberties.
And I just want to make sure
that that historical effort
is documented. As it is
in these memorials in stone,
I want it to be crafted
in stone in our textbooks.
Explain the impact
of the writings of John Locke,
Thomas Hobbes, Voltaire,
Charles de Montesquieu,
Jean-Jacques Rousseau,
Thomas Aquinas, John Calvin,
and Sir William Blackstone
on political revolutions
from 1750 to the present.
It does take out reference
to Thomas Jefferson,
but the reason is not
that I don't think
his ideas were important;
it's just that
this is a list
of political philosophers
from which
the founding fathers
based their ideologies
and their principles.
Mr. Craig.
It appears to me that
the work group members
had specifically the desire
to talk about
the Enlightenment ideas
and also to mention
these particular individuals.
still needs to be there,
so I will support
what the work group members
had recommended.
My intent was in no way
to strike at Jefferson,
to 'minimalize' his impact.
I love Jefferson.
I'm a huge fan.
The problem
is that Enlightenment,
current day,
is understood
from the viewpoint
of the Secular
Humanistic ideology.
If you want to see how those
philosophers played out,
look at the distinction
between the French revolution
and the American revolution.
One was a Secular
Humanistic... Voltaire,...
Anti-Judeo-Christian beliefs.
The other was
what Jefferson put forward
in the Decloration
of Independence:
"the laws of nature
and nature's God. "
When you have added
people like Thomas Aquinas
and John Calvin
to the standards...
the standard says,
"the student understands
"how contemporary
political systems have developed
from earlier systems
of government"...
where does Thomas Aquinas
fall in that?
Yeah, uh, sir...
He doesn't.
Absolutely, Thomas Aquinas
is the philosopher
that started
the original ideology
of the laws of nature.
And it's from that
that was developed
all the political philosophies
that brought forward
the foundations
of civil jurisprudence.
And the same thing
with Calvin.
No one knows anything
of American liberty
if they don't know
of the writings of Calvin.
The fact that they have not
been included up to this point
shows that there's a dearth
of understanding
of any kind of philosophy
beyond 'Enlightenment'.
Well, I think
you're stretching it a bit.
Certainly Plato in his
'Republic' had a lot to say
about government relationships
to citizens
that could have been added here
as well.
Why isn't Thomas Jefferson
seen as a leader
of revolutionary thinking
in the 18th and 19th century?
He wrote the Declaration
of Independence.
Right, well, and, actually,
I'm really glad
that you even put that forward,
because it's been misrepresented
in the media a lot,
that Thomas Jefferson
was actually stricken
from the TEKS,
which is not accurate.
He's actually listed
throughout the document,
including the political
philosophies
of the founding fathers.
I'm with Don McLeroy.
He's considered the leader
of the conservative bloc.
Mr. Mcleroy,
how is the meeting going?
We're a bunch
of lay citizens
on the State Board
of Education,
and we want to make sure
that our children
are taught good,
solid American history.
And I think we're in step
with most of the majority
of Americans.
Most gracious Heavenly Father,
as we look to our past
to guide us,
let us reflect
on the convictions
of those who have
gone before us.
I believe no one can read
the history of our country
without realizing
that the Good Book
and the spirit of the Savior
have, from the beginning,
been our guiding geniuses.
Whether we look to
the first Charter of Virginia
or the Charter of New England
or the Fundamental Orders
of Connecticut,
the same objective
is present:
a Christian land governed
by Christian principles.
I like to believe
we are living today
in the spirit
of the Christian religion.
I like, also, to believe
that as long as we do so,
no great harm can come
to our country.
All this I pray in the name
of my Lord and Savior,
Jesus Christ.
Amen.
Mrs. Cargill.
18 F.
This would also be new.
"formulate generalizations
"on how economic freedom
improved the human condition
compared to communist command
communities".
This is really
the last minute.
Today we're gonna vote...
Final vote on this.
Have not been able
to consult with anybody,
And then here we are today
at the last minute
looking at new language.
I've read it.
I am thinking,
and it is highly appropriate
for students to learn
to the value of the
free enterprise system.
Is there any further
discussion?
I hear things like,
"this is our privilege. "
And we are changing the intent
of the writers.
Speak to the issue
of the privilege of members
to make amendments.
I tend to remember this was
in my job description.
Striking John Calvin and
inserting Thomas Jefferson.
The amendment fails.
Mr. Mercer.
After John Calvin,
I'd like to insert
Thomas Jefferson
and James Madison.
Thomas Jefferson comma
James Madison.
We're changing everything
in this section.
I am proposing
we delete
"constitutional republic"
and insert
"democratic society. "
All those opposed.
The amendment fails.
You have to have
an objective
in the standard.
That's how you write
standards.
I guess
I just have to say,
you have to trust me on this,
but I actually do teach
political philosophies
at the Doctoral level.
The amendment carries
11 to 3.
I wish to re-insert
the name Oscar Romero.
I would like to offer
an amendment,
a motion to insert
the name 'Hussein'
in between 'Barack' and 'Obama'.
I feel that I have let down
the students in our state.
Because all those kids
that are in school right now,
and they get to college,
Translation
Translate and read this script in other languages:
Select another language:
- - Select -
- 简体中文 (Chinese - Simplified)
- 繁體中文 (Chinese - Traditional)
- Español (Spanish)
- Esperanto (Esperanto)
- 日本語 (Japanese)
- Português (Portuguese)
- Deutsch (German)
- العربية (Arabic)
- Français (French)
- Русский (Russian)
- ಕನ್ನಡ (Kannada)
- 한국어 (Korean)
- עברית (Hebrew)
- Gaeilge (Irish)
- Українська (Ukrainian)
- اردو (Urdu)
- Magyar (Hungarian)
- मानक हिन्दी (Hindi)
- Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Italiano (Italian)
- தமிழ் (Tamil)
- Türkçe (Turkish)
- తెలుగు (Telugu)
- ภาษาไทย (Thai)
- Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
- Čeština (Czech)
- Polski (Polish)
- Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Românește (Romanian)
- Nederlands (Dutch)
- Ελληνικά (Greek)
- Latinum (Latin)
- Svenska (Swedish)
- Dansk (Danish)
- Suomi (Finnish)
- فارسی (Persian)
- ייִדיש (Yiddish)
- հայերեն (Armenian)
- Norsk (Norwegian)
- English (English)
Citation
Use the citation below to add this screenplay to your bibliography:
Style:MLAChicagoAPA
"The Revisionaries" Scripts.com. STANDS4 LLC, 2024. Web. 23 Dec. 2024. <https://www.scripts.com/script/the_revisionaries_21200>.
Discuss this script with the community:
Report Comment
We're doing our best to make sure our content is useful, accurate and safe.
If by any chance you spot an inappropriate comment while navigating through our website please use this form to let us know, and we'll take care of it shortly.
Attachment
You need to be logged in to favorite.
Log In