The Thin Blue Line Page #7
- NOT RATED
- Year:
- 1988
- 101 min
- 883 Views
that they will commit
violent crimes in the future.
You can't tell what
somebody's gonna do years from now.
Not really.
Except based on your past record,
which anybody can do.
Randall never had any prior record.
And as far as we know, he never had
any history of violence whatever.
Grigson testified for...
two and a half hours
about all these degrees he's got.
He's been here, and he's been there,
and he's studied here.
He said I'm the type of personality...
that can work all day and creep all night.
He testified, Grigson...
that the future seriousness...
of my mental state...
would be such that if they released me...
probably butcher half of Dallas County.
Even though he talked to me 15 minutes...
I have no prior convictions,
no prior arrests...
I was nonviolent for 28 years.
On one instance...
and that's saying if I did this,
which I didn't...
he's stating that, that's enough...
For the rest of my life, watch me.
Don't ever turn your back on me.
And he talked to me 15 minutes.
He's crazy.
You can understand why a man
might steal if he needs money...
to put food on the table.
I can understand why a 17-year-old
boy who doesn't have a car...
would steal one to ride around in.
I can understand
why the heroin addict needs heroin.
But it's very hard to understand
why anybody has to kill a police officer.
It just doesn't have to be.
When I'm asleep
and I close my eyes and think...
"Why would he do it?
"He had no background
that would lead to murder...
"no reason to commit a murder. "
And I look at the facts of the case and say...
David Harris knew the car was stolen,
knew the guns were there...
knew the guns were stolen...
was on a crime spree...
had had a criminal record prior to
stealing this car and these guns.
He was the one
that wanted to commit the murder...
and get away from the scene.
He was the one that,
after the murder was committed...
went right back home
and bragged about it to his friends.
I looked at all the evidence...
and I found that I believed
that David Harris committed murder.
The jury looked at the same evidence...
Randall Adams committed murder.
And it was their verdict that counted.
You have a D. A...
he doesn't talk about...
when they convict you
or how they convict you...
he's talking about
how he's going to kill you.
He don't give a damn if you're innocent.
He don't give a damn if you're guilty.
He's talking about killing you.
You get numb. You get...
It's like a bad dream. You want
to wake up, but you can't do it.
Fifteen times, 20 times a day,
I hear this same story...
about what happens
when a man is electrocuted.
His eyeballs pop out.
His fingernails pop out.
His toenails pop out.
He bleeds out of every orifice he's got.
They don't care...
They don't care.
All they want to do is talk about
how they're going to kill you.
That's the only thing that they cared
about and talked about.
At that point, that's all they're wanting.
I didn't have any idea
what happened to him.
After I testified, I was gone.
I never really concerned myself with it.
Maybe I didn't want to know. I don't know.
I didn't have any interest in knowing...
otherwise I might have tried to find out.
Dennis filed the motion for a new trial...
then we filed an amended motion
for a new trial.
About 20 days later,
we were to have a hearing on it.
Both Robert Miller and his wife
testified there.
But we could not bring out the fact...
that they had said that they were
gonna get that reward money...
and that they didn't care
whether they saw anything or not...
but their car was too steamed up.
We were not allowed to get any of that in...
because it was held
that it was impeaching testimony...
and therefore it came too late.
We kept running into blank walls.
A reporter from the Dallas Morning News...
discovered that one week
after the trial was over with...
the daughter of this woman
had a robbery case in this court.
She offered her testimony...
at a time when her daughter
was in danger of going to jail for life...
and got her daughter out of jail.
How can you believe her...
when the very next week
the same judge dismisses that case?
The Millers are the kind of people
that would do anything...
if there was something to be gained...
such as her daughter not being sent
to the penitentiary for armed robbery...
or for money.
When we went to court that day,
the District Attorney was hard-nosed.
Wouldn't let me answer any questions.
He'd ask me questions,
but then he'd cut me off real short.
And that's when he said something
about my big fat nose.
If I'd kept my big fat nose
out of their business...
the Millers would be better off.
When I started to leave
out of the courtroom...
he started laughing, like:
"Didn't do you any good to get up here. "
It really didn't. Didn't help the guy at all.
To the best of my recollection...
the brief conversations
I have had with Mr. Adams...
and they have been brief...
I don't even recall ever asking him,
or my having told me...
that he did not do it.
Because, for my purposes,
representing him on appeal...
it's totally irrelevant.
When the Court of Criminal Appeals
of Texas...
voted 9-0 against us,
I was a little upset about that.
I felt we, A:
Should have won...B:
Certainly shouldn't have beenslapped so hard...
with the unanimous decision against us.
I was with my family in an ice-cream parlor...
and the judge and his family
happened to come at the same time.
And he came over to me
and made the comment...
"I see where the Court of Criminal
Appeals gave me an 'A'...
"in the Adams case. "
Our highest state appellate court...
in Austin affirmed the case, 9-0.
Then it was reversed by the
United States Supreme Court, 8-1...
When the Appellate Court reverses a case...
they are never saying
the trial judge was right or wrong.
They are saying
they disagree with the judge.
You can't, for instance,
in the Adams appeals...
say the appellate courts
were saying I was right or I was wrong.
After all, if in Austin...
I was 9-0 correct...
and in Washington, I was 1-8 incorrect.
If you tally all those votes, I come out 10-8.
Yet the case was reversed.
Eight justices of the Supreme Court
were the first people to agree with me.
They're the only people anywhere
that ever agreed about that statute...
were eight justices of the Supreme Court.
had a very nice front-page story...
either the same day...
or the day after the reversal was
announced by the Supreme Court...
in which Henry Wade, the District Attorney...
vowed a retrial of Randall Dale Adams...
because there was no room
in his book for a cop-killer...
getting off with anything less
than the death penalty.
I took that to heart. I thought
Translation
Translate and read this script in other languages:
Select another language:
- - Select -
- 简体中文 (Chinese - Simplified)
- 繁體中文 (Chinese - Traditional)
- Español (Spanish)
- Esperanto (Esperanto)
- 日本語 (Japanese)
- Português (Portuguese)
- Deutsch (German)
- العربية (Arabic)
- Français (French)
- Русский (Russian)
- ಕನ್ನಡ (Kannada)
- 한국어 (Korean)
- עברית (Hebrew)
- Gaeilge (Irish)
- Українська (Ukrainian)
- اردو (Urdu)
- Magyar (Hungarian)
- मानक हिन्दी (Hindi)
- Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Italiano (Italian)
- தமிழ் (Tamil)
- Türkçe (Turkish)
- తెలుగు (Telugu)
- ภาษาไทย (Thai)
- Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
- Čeština (Czech)
- Polski (Polish)
- Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Românește (Romanian)
- Nederlands (Dutch)
- Ελληνικά (Greek)
- Latinum (Latin)
- Svenska (Swedish)
- Dansk (Danish)
- Suomi (Finnish)
- فارسی (Persian)
- ייִדיש (Yiddish)
- հայերեն (Armenian)
- Norsk (Norwegian)
- English (English)
Citation
Use the citation below to add this screenplay to your bibliography:
Style:MLAChicagoAPA
"The Thin Blue Line" Scripts.com. STANDS4 LLC, 2024. Web. 22 Nov. 2024. <https://www.scripts.com/script/the_thin_blue_line_21754>.
Discuss this script with the community:
Report Comment
We're doing our best to make sure our content is useful, accurate and safe.
If by any chance you spot an inappropriate comment while navigating through our website please use this form to let us know, and we'll take care of it shortly.
Attachment
You need to be logged in to favorite.
Log In