The Weight of Chains Page #10

Synopsis: The Weight of Chains is a Canadian documentary film that takes a critical look at the role that the US, NATO and the EU played in the tragic breakup of a once peaceful and prosperous European state - Yugoslavia. The film, bursting with rare stock footage never before seen by Western audiences, is a creative first-hand look at why the West intervened in the Yugoslav conflict, with an impressive roster of interviews with academics, diplomats, media personalities and ordinary citizens of the former Yugoslav republics. This film also presents positive stories from the Yugoslav wars - people helping each other regardless of their ethnic background, stories of bravery and self-sacrifice.
 
IMDB:
8.2
NOT RATED
Year:
2010
125 min
96 Views


closed last year. 80 people from the village Mezozombora lost their jobs.

factory break down.

I think to notice pattern here.

places like the Balkans and the rest of Eastern Europe should not have been colleagues

and equal in the brotherhood of nations, but for them market is intended to be

for the western industrial goods, to be a source of cheap labor.

Keep in mind that it takes time to join the EU.

But you will not hear anything about these things in the media.

EU spends around two billion euros a year for his advertising in the media.

They spozorisu show programs on TV, radio, various other programs and so on.

They organize conferences, especially for journalists. It is a massive industry

You almost never hear criticism by EU journalists.

In Serbia has never been any real debate on the EU's

and even attempt to start such a debate would be sentenced

from the very beginning as an anti-European.

Those who attempt to begin such discussions are terminated.

I remember that man, was the party of neo G-17 +

He told me:
'Yes, you criticize the EU, and you live in the EU. Slovenia in the EU is good '.

No, I really do not. This is a standard propaganda, do you understand?

We are not better because we in the EU, but the other way around.

We are in the EU because we are better than others, eg., The former Yugoslav republics.

After the death of Yugoslavia, the former Yugoslav republics, each wanted to become a EU member.

Slovenia became the first who joined in 2004., But was not thrilled.

We have not more states, we are the only EU region. Why are you hard?

We do not have monetary policy, we practically have no fiscal policy

because we are limited by EU rules.

Are things better now that Slovenia is in EU?

No, I think not.

No, it seems to me that it is not.

I do not think so.

prices have doubled, everything is more expensive.

The clothing is more expensive.

I voted 'no' when we had a referendum on EU accession.

As you know, if you are part of the EU, you give something in common EU coffers.

A lot of social rights that we had earlier has now narrowed.

In my personal opinion, I believe that the EU is more corporations

than a political organization that provides human rights.

right across Slovenia, Croatia has dropped out of applying

Ecological and Fisheries Protection Zone (ZERP) to the EU countries

since the third Italian fishing activities were based in this area.

Croatia is also thrown into the water its banking sector.

On the other hand, citizens of Serbia hardly cease to believe in everything that comes from the west in

often believing the propaganda to the west really like

and that even if the Serbs were bombed, they do so for the good of the Serbs.

I think it is a situation where we are today a result of

something that I call predatory capitalism. He started in the 70's

when I was an economic killer, and then we were using predatory capitalism

in the developing world at large. The first principle of the

that the only responsibility of business to maximize profits regardless of the consequences for society and the environment.

After the breakup of Yugoslavia, the federal debt is divided between the successor states.

In Montenegro, the debt was 416 million figure reached 4.7 billion dollars.

Macedonia has jumped from 890 million to 6.7 billion dollars in debt in

and Bosnia has gone from 2.1 billion to 16.5 billion dollars in debt.

Long Serbia has risen from 5.5 billion to 38 billion dollars in

Slovenia from 2.6 billion to a staggering 56 , 3 billion.

And Croatia, the absolute winner of the 1017 debt nagomilanju 01:42:44,111 -- 01:42:49,811 with $ 4.6 billion to a staggering $ 69 billion.

Eh, Yugoslavs like to say that they lived well during Tito's Yugoslavia in

because they had been in charge. And now is not?

OK, they were bought by foreigners. What's so bad?

Here's an example to the west with Yugoslavia robbed minus debts.

First, it imposed a severe sanction.

Miroljub Labus, otherwise, a member of the G17 +, one of those so-called. pro-IMF experts.

which is about 29% of Croatia's total GDP. This would be great

that the money and stayed in Croatia.

tax on goods and services from 19% euros and wishes of the restaurants, cafes and private accommodation

and the profits went to Germany.

Thank you Germany, my soul on fire.

And if macroeconomic stability is threatened in all the republics in

The IMF and World Bank come into play in order to 'save the situation' .

And how do they do? Let's say you IMF and World Bank provide a loan in

than 300 million dollars that pay interest of 5.5 to 7%.

But money is not going anywhere, no no, it stays in the big American and German banks in

and the Republican foreign exchange reserves , to which the payment of interest of 2 to 2.5%.

Then, that same bank, in essence, with the Republican money, provide investment loans republics

through the various development funds, which again increases the debt to be repaid in

only with new borrowing. So it's all in a circle.

What does it mean for ordinary people? If we look at statistics, so much each citizen in

Yugoslavia owes international financiers. However, many people still think

of the factors that come to help us.

Foreign banks used the desperate state of the Yugoslav peoples in

for personal interests, sometimes by criminal means.

desperate situation has become worse due to the global financial crisis in

and Croatia look into what else could sell, and that abound.

That's right, the island!

Brijuni national park, where there is Tito's luxurious villa.

In the meantime, the colony of Bosnia, the IMF said Section 7 a new Bosnian constitution in

laid down in Dayton, Ohio. They decided the following:

'Board of Directors of the Central Bank shall consist of a Governor will ask the IMF "1053 01:49:18,438 -- 01:49:25,178 and that' The Governor shall be a citizen of Bosnia and Herzegovina or any neighboring countries. "

So, the government of Bosnia has no control over their own economy.

It would not be fair to say that all the money invested in Bosnia Otplacivanje used for its debts.

No, a lot of money is gone and the Bosnians.

The only thing that could have gone into the hands of a very small number of Bosnians. Very, very few.

According to the Unit for Combating Corruption, which established the Office

High Representative, a billion dollars has disappeared from public funds and international

charitable projects for assistance, between the 1995th and 1999. year.

Wondering where all that money go? For example, in the town of Sanski Most in

money went to the track for horse racing, rather than economic development or infrastructure.

If you're going to steal public funds and aid, which does not go one step further in

and gambles them, right? Mayor of Sanski Most also gave 450 000 1065 01:50:15,896 -- 01:50:21,101 from his brother, Saudi Arabia, that guy has opened a new bank.

Rate this script:0.0 / 0 votes

Boris Malagurski

Boris Malagurski (Serbian Cyrillic: Борис Малагурски; born 11 August 1988) is a Serbian-Canadian film director, producer, writer, political commentator, television host and activist, known for his movie The Weight of Chains. He is the owner of Malagurski Cinema. more…

All Boris Malagurski scripts | Boris Malagurski Scripts

0 fans

Submitted on August 05, 2018

Discuss this script with the community:

0 Comments

    Translation

    Translate and read this script in other languages:

    Select another language:

    • - Select -
    • 简体中文 (Chinese - Simplified)
    • 繁體中文 (Chinese - Traditional)
    • Español (Spanish)
    • Esperanto (Esperanto)
    • 日本語 (Japanese)
    • Português (Portuguese)
    • Deutsch (German)
    • العربية (Arabic)
    • Français (French)
    • Русский (Russian)
    • ಕನ್ನಡ (Kannada)
    • 한국어 (Korean)
    • עברית (Hebrew)
    • Gaeilge (Irish)
    • Українська (Ukrainian)
    • اردو (Urdu)
    • Magyar (Hungarian)
    • मानक हिन्दी (Hindi)
    • Indonesia (Indonesian)
    • Italiano (Italian)
    • தமிழ் (Tamil)
    • Türkçe (Turkish)
    • తెలుగు (Telugu)
    • ภาษาไทย (Thai)
    • Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
    • Čeština (Czech)
    • Polski (Polish)
    • Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
    • Românește (Romanian)
    • Nederlands (Dutch)
    • Ελληνικά (Greek)
    • Latinum (Latin)
    • Svenska (Swedish)
    • Dansk (Danish)
    • Suomi (Finnish)
    • فارسی (Persian)
    • ייִדיש (Yiddish)
    • հայերեն (Armenian)
    • Norsk (Norwegian)
    • English (English)

    Citation

    Use the citation below to add this screenplay to your bibliography:

    Style:MLAChicagoAPA

    "The Weight of Chains" Scripts.com. STANDS4 LLC, 2024. Web. 23 Dec. 2024. <https://www.scripts.com/script/the_weight_of_chains_23200>.

    We need you!

    Help us build the largest writers community and scripts collection on the web!

    Watch the movie trailer

    The Weight of Chains

    The Studio:

    ScreenWriting Tool

    Write your screenplay and focus on the story with many helpful features.


    Quiz

    Are you a screenwriting master?

    »
    Who played the character "Forrest Gump"?
    A Tom Hanks
    B Brad Pitt
    C Matt Damon
    D Leonardo DiCaprio