Treasures of the Louvre Page #6
- Year:
- 2013
- 90 min
- 85 Views
Emperor explained that he hadn't got
the Pontiff all the way from the
Vatican just to sit and do nothing.
So, David changed this to Pope
Pius VII blessing the coronation.
And there's mischief here too.
Look at the wily survivor
Talleyrand and his turned up nose.
This is the man that
Bonaparte famously called,
"a piece of sh*t
in a silk stocking."
The female figure on the balcony,
that's Napoleon's mother,
who couldn't stand Josephine
and actually wasn't
there on the big day.
But on instruction,
David put her in the picture anyway.
And there, of course, sketchbook in
hand, is the great artist himself.
Despite the success
of this painting,
there was a prickly
relationship between David
and the courtiers
around the Emperor.
the first of four
celebrating the coronation,
but the project was never completed
So it's perhaps no coincidence
that in 1806, the great general
gave David and fellow painters
their marching orders.
They had just 24 hours
the Cour Carree and get out.
And when Napoleon married
for the second time in 1810,
David wasn't asked
to record the ceremony
when it took place in the Louvre.
The close relationship between
painter and despot was over
David to new rivals
Napoleon to the hubris that
led to his fall from power
and the return of
the Bourbon monarchy.
The rule of Napoleon was ended in
1815 with the Battle of Waterloo,
and the Restoration of the
Bourbon dynasty was secured.
The Louvre was renamed
Le Musee Royal,
and all of the visual
propaganda changed too.
Out went the Napoleonic N
and the bees and the eagles
that had been his symbol,
and in came the image of the lily
and the monogram LL for Louis XVIII,
and there was other
interesting stuff.
If you look up here, you can see
that this is the face of Napoleon.
What happened was that the new King
had a wig placed
on Bonaparte's head,
transforming him into the image of
his illustrious forebear, Louis XIV.
The Restoration was a challenging
period for the Louvre, forced
to concede to demands that 5,000
pieces of plundered art be returned.
The bronze horses on top of the
Arc de Triomphe went back to Venice,
and were replaced by
these grey imitations.
Some treasures did remain.
The Wedding at Cana was kept,
simply too big to be moved again,
the museum argued.
An elderly David was now in exile
like his former patron Bonaparte,
but a new generation
of painters was emerging
and producing
stunning works of art.
One is to be found
in the Salle Rouge.
This painting, Le Radeau de la
Meduse, The Raft of the Medusa
by Gericault, is one of the
great treasures of the Louvre.
It was the talk of the Salon when
it was first exhibited in 1819,
and it was very quickly acquired
by the then-director of the Louvre,
the Compte de Forbin. I think it's
an extraordinary, complex painting.
It's realistic but
it's not quite real,
constructed as a kind of pyramid.
It's very romantic,
but also about
the impossibility of hope.
But what you really feel
is that you're in the painting,
you're in that pyramid
of human suffering.
And you can see the kind of
forensic nature of Gericault's work.
He was the kind of man who
spent hours in mortuaries
and hospitals
sketching out dead bodies
and he wasn't even afraid to take
home the limbs to work out the
tricky bits, and that's what makes
this painting so stark, so powerful.
There was no bigger scandal
than the shipwreck of the frigate
Meduse off the West African coast,
captained by the hapless
Viscount Chaumareys.
Of the 147 crew, only 13 survived.
This was headline news,
and the public lapped up lurid
tales of cannibalism and madness.
good for the career
of the 20-year-old artist.
I asked curator Sebastien Allard
about the painting.
HE SPEAKS FRENCH
TRANSLATOR:
'It was, and has beentaken as a form of allegory,
'since Gericault's depicting
a ship that was wrecked
incompetence of its captain.
'Survivors were stranded on a raft
without food, water or hope,
'and people took all this as an
allusion to the French State
'after the fall of the Empire,
governed by incompetence.'
There are more intense, romantic
sensibilities at work here.
TRANSLATOR:
'We can see here a tastefor rather dark and sinister painting
'that's in stark contrast to the
relatively clear and bright paintings
'of David, and which, of course,
'acts as a tool towards the
dramatic effect of the painting.
'And it's a rather macabre style,
'with a penchant
for death and corpses.'
As well as bringing the best of
contemporary art into the Louvre,
these decades of the Restoration
saw the arrival from Egypt
of mysterious and magical objects
that were old yet very new.
On the 25th of October 1836,
the great obelisk
behind me here was unveiled.
It came from a temple in Luxor
and was the gift
of the Khedive of Egypt.
Its original base featured monkeys
who had suspiciously
large erections,
and obviously this had to be
replaced by something
much more austere, in granite
and fashioned in Brittany.
But nonetheless, this latest
monument was a great success,
and the most important thing was
that it announced a new mania in
France for all things Oriental.
The man who arranged the passage
of the obelisk to Paris,
and who brought so much
to the story of the Louvre,
was Jean-Francois Champollion.
Now Champollion worked here
in the Louvre, and he established
the superb and stunning
collection that we see here today.
But not only that, Champollion
was the first person to decipher
hieroglyphics, and in doing so, he
invented the science of Egyptology.
Inspired by Napoleon's
Egyptian Campaigns,
Champollion devoted his life to
understanding this ancient culture.
By the age of 16, he knew
and with this
extraordinary facility,
he began the long task
of deciphering hieroglyphs.
In 1824, in the
Precis du systeme hieroglyphique,
Champollion revealed that he had
By this time, Champollion had
persuaded the King to buy three
private collections for the Louvre,
When it opened, Champollion wrote
an open letter to visitors saying,
"I'm thrilled just thinking
about what I have to show you."
And he was dead right
to be thrilled.
Along with statues
of Egyptian pharaohs,
there were religious artefacts
and everyday objects.
Today, we take these for granted,
but in 1826, this was
the shock of the new.
on this moment in our story,
because it signals another
important transformation
for the Louvre.
Before, it was a
palace with paintings.
Translation
Translate and read this script in other languages:
Select another language:
- - Select -
- 简体中文 (Chinese - Simplified)
- 繁體中文 (Chinese - Traditional)
- Español (Spanish)
- Esperanto (Esperanto)
- 日本語 (Japanese)
- Português (Portuguese)
- Deutsch (German)
- العربية (Arabic)
- Français (French)
- Русский (Russian)
- ಕನ್ನಡ (Kannada)
- 한국어 (Korean)
- עברית (Hebrew)
- Gaeilge (Irish)
- Українська (Ukrainian)
- اردو (Urdu)
- Magyar (Hungarian)
- मानक हिन्दी (Hindi)
- Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Italiano (Italian)
- தமிழ் (Tamil)
- Türkçe (Turkish)
- తెలుగు (Telugu)
- ภาษาไทย (Thai)
- Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
- Čeština (Czech)
- Polski (Polish)
- Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Românește (Romanian)
- Nederlands (Dutch)
- Ελληνικά (Greek)
- Latinum (Latin)
- Svenska (Swedish)
- Dansk (Danish)
- Suomi (Finnish)
- فارسی (Persian)
- ייִדיש (Yiddish)
- հայերեն (Armenian)
- Norsk (Norwegian)
- English (English)
Citation
Use the citation below to add this screenplay to your bibliography:
Style:MLAChicagoAPA
"Treasures of the Louvre" Scripts.com. STANDS4 LLC, 2024. Web. 23 Nov. 2024. <https://www.scripts.com/script/treasures_of_the_louvre_22236>.
Discuss this script with the community:
Report Comment
We're doing our best to make sure our content is useful, accurate and safe.
If by any chance you spot an inappropriate comment while navigating through our website please use this form to let us know, and we'll take care of it shortly.
Attachment
You need to be logged in to favorite.
Log In