Watergate Trial Conversations Page #2
- Year:
- 1971
- 353 Views
believe it, I don't believe it.
UNIDENTIFIED:
I'll, I'llCONNALLY:
They just raised and paid twenty thousanddollars for a meeting in Brownsville not too
long ago. And this means -they've got
security. And, uh, they're doing some
things that I think are a little strongarmed
tactics, perhaps, in, uh, the
organizing, uh. But, uh, I don't criticize
that unless we are prepared to take on
business and labor and all at the same time.
There's no point in denying the farmer
what's the practice for labor. And, uh, so
I'm not, I wouldn't judge it on a moral
basis. I judge it on the basis of, uh
HARDIN:
You've heard all the rest of itCONNALLY:
I'm addressing myself to the narrow aspects,to the political aspects of it. I don't
think there's a better organization in the
United States. If you can get it, uh, you
can get more help from, that, uh, will be,
uh, be more loyal to you. And, uh, and I
think they've got a worthy case to begin
with. And uh, that being true, I just think
you ought to stretch the point. I wouldn't
wait till next year, so that -- I know that
there's been some advice given to you, to
wait till next year. Uh, that's -- I will
differ with that, simply because they're
going to make their association and -their
alliances this year and they're going to
spend a lot of money this year in various
Congressional and Senatorial races all over
this United States. And, you don't want to
be in a position -- as you well know better
than I -- you got no questions when people
think they forced you into doing something
for them. And they're not now in that
position. If, if you do something for them
this year, they think you've done it because
they got a good case and because you're
their friend. If you wait till next year, I
don't care what you do for them. They're
going to say, "Well, we put enough pressure
on them this election year, they had to do
it." And you, you get no credit for it. So
it's still going to cost you an enormous
amount of money next year, and you get no
political advantage out of it. And, I just
think that, uh, that unless you just, uh --
the economics of it are just beyond reach,
or beyond question that, uh, if you ought to
really seriously think about doing it this
year.
PRESIDENT:
That's the problem. I have two problems --is that you have it in the House and the
Senate.
CONNALLY:
What you are going -to do on that?UNIDENTIFIED:
[Unintelligible]PRESIDENT:
What I mean is, that if you don't do it,they're going to do it anyway.
CONNALLY:
I think if you don't do itPRESIDENT:
If they do,CONNALLY:
they're going to pass it.PRESIDENT:
I think they do.HARDIN:
I think it'sPRESIDENT:
We have a damn near insoluble problem.HARDIN:
I think it's, as it stands today, it'salmost certain to pass.
CONNALLY:
Uh, I think -that's right.EHRLICHMAN:
Is that what Belcher told you?HARDIN:
Yes, yes, I think they got a hundred andfifty names on the bill.
UNIDENTIFIED:
You sure?HARDIN:
And, uh,UNIDENTIFIED:
What is it?HARDIN:
and, uh, the Speaker's all out for it.CONNALLY:
Absolutely. Wilbur's all out for it.UNIDENTIFIED:
Yeah.CONNALLY:
Well, they're going to pass it through theHouse. Beyond any question in the world.
HARDIN:
And, uh, and, uh, they'll pull the liberalson this one, uh, because they're, they'll
say they're going to embarrass the
President,
PRESIDENT:
That's right.HARDIN:
Uh, the liberals might attract the consumersin any other situation. But they won't do
it now.
PRESIDENT:
That'll raise the price, you see. I mean,that's the way they'll cut the liberals off.
They'll say: No, they're going to -- we
guarantee, we won't -- like they told us
this morning, we won't raise the price;
we'll cut back on production -- we'll have a
voluntary --
HARDIN:
Uh, I spoke, I spoke a little bit with them,this morning, uh, but 1 just don't quite know --
UNIDENTIFIED:
[Unintelligible]CONNALLY:
Now they've already figured out and how --They're circulating -- I've had it for days
they're circulating how they're going to cut
you up this year. And that's what they're
going to do. They got it all figured out.
They're passing this out on the Hill, just
exactly how many electoral votes they're
going to cost you if you veto the 85% bill -
- which they think they're going to pass.
And I think they're going to pass it. And
they say that it'll cost you Missouri,
Wisconsin, South Dakota for sure. Veto will
probably cost you Ohio, Kentucky and Iowa.
And, then they go on down and they take the
states and they figure what percentage of
the states it's going to cost you and
they're going to [unintelligible]
HARDIN:
Well, if it does pass, I don't think thePresident has any choice but to sign it.
PRESIDENT:
Well-, all right.CONNALLY:
Well, then, what do you do? If you do,you've cost yourself the money -- you've
lost your political advantage. You, you're,
you're infinitely worse off.
PRESIDENT:
Probably.CONNALLY:
That's where you are.HARDIN:
I think so.PRESIDENT:
What's the cost?HARDIN:
Oh, it's just a wild guess. They saidthirty-five million and I would suggest that
it's, uh, nearer a hundred.
PRESIDENT:
You would?HARDIN:
Now if they could get, if they need to wehad a little talk after you left and
UNIDENTIFIED:
Right.HARDIN:
uh, about whether they really couldinfluence production. And they could, if
they went all out to do it. And what they
would do, a year from now, would be end up
with a hundred and twenty million -- billion
pounds of milk produced. Uh, they'd be a
mature enough organization that they could,
uh, recognize that they had made a mistake
and could go out and tell their members they
had to survive. Uh, well, they're -- maybe
we won't talk about that. Uh, it's a fact
of life. Uh
PRESIDENT:
Uh, it seems to me that the problem we have,Cliff, is this. That, uh, and as you know
we have decided on a different course of
action in the cheese business and all the
other --
HARDIN:
Well that has to be done. That has, has tobe done anyhow.
PRESIDENT:
Oh, what I mean isn't that what we decidedthat, and that was all we could do.
UNIDENTIFIED:
Yeah.SHULTZ:
The higher you raise the price, the morecertain it is that you have to be strict
about the imports, otherwise, all we're
doing is paying the money to the foreigners.
UNIDENTIFIED:
Yeah.SHULTZ:
You have to make a judgment on the importbusiness.
UNIDENTIFIED:
Yeah.PRESIDENT:
Uh, I see yourSHULTZ:
See that high price here throughout the
Translation
Translate and read this script in other languages:
Select another language:
- - Select -
- 简体中文 (Chinese - Simplified)
- 繁體中文 (Chinese - Traditional)
- Español (Spanish)
- Esperanto (Esperanto)
- 日本語 (Japanese)
- Português (Portuguese)
- Deutsch (German)
- العربية (Arabic)
- Français (French)
- Русский (Russian)
- ಕನ್ನಡ (Kannada)
- 한국어 (Korean)
- עברית (Hebrew)
- Gaeilge (Irish)
- Українська (Ukrainian)
- اردو (Urdu)
- Magyar (Hungarian)
- मानक हिन्दी (Hindi)
- Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Italiano (Italian)
- தமிழ் (Tamil)
- Türkçe (Turkish)
- తెలుగు (Telugu)
- ภาษาไทย (Thai)
- Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
- Čeština (Czech)
- Polski (Polish)
- Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Românește (Romanian)
- Nederlands (Dutch)
- Ελληνικά (Greek)
- Latinum (Latin)
- Svenska (Swedish)
- Dansk (Danish)
- Suomi (Finnish)
- فارسی (Persian)
- ייִדיש (Yiddish)
- հայերեն (Armenian)
- Norsk (Norwegian)
- English (English)
Citation
Use the citation below to add this screenplay to your bibliography:
Style:MLAChicagoAPA
"Watergate Trial Conversations" Scripts.com. STANDS4 LLC, 2024. Web. 21 Nov. 2024. <https://www.scripts.com/script/watergate_trial_conversations_1022>.
Discuss this script with the community:
Report Comment
We're doing our best to make sure our content is useful, accurate and safe.
If by any chance you spot an inappropriate comment while navigating through our website please use this form to let us know, and we'll take care of it shortly.
Attachment
You need to be logged in to favorite.
Log In