We Are Many Page #8
- Year:
- 2014
- 110 min
- 33 Views
a people-powered campaigning movement.
That did come out of the experience,
I think, of feeling the failure.
I got the sense from the people on the podium
that they in a way felt the job was done,
that this was gonna change
the government's opinion.
Now, we will never know
what Tony Blair and his advisers
were thinking on the eve of that day.
I'm sure they gambled on us not coming back.
if we'd have come back the next weekend,
they may not have changed then,
but they would have certainly been nervous.
But if we'd have come back
then you never know what would have happened.
And in that sense,
I feel very frustrated
and a deep sense of regret
about the fact
that we just didn't finish the job.
I did believe, I think as many of us
believed on that march,
that we could actually change something,
and the fact that we couldn't
has stuck in our craws ever since.
It was a huge missed opportunity
because I don't think the march
in itself would ever stop the war
because people go home
and the government can live with that.
What they can't live with
is serious organization,
and that's what we needed out of that.
You have a couple of days
of mass demonstrations
during a weekend in London.
What does that do to the powers that be?
Nothing, nothing.
You need to escalate.
We had this decision
that on the day of the attack,
on 1:
00pm, we're going to assemblein Tahrir Square.
Once the strikes begin, we all go to Tahrir.
Once the war starts, at 12 noon,
everybody would go out
on the streets towards Tahrir.
So I went with my high heels,
thinking it was going to be
just an hour-Iong demonstration
and that the anti-riot police
and, you know, I had evening plans,
and, uh, I went home at midnight.
That's when hell broke loose in Egypt.
You had the biggest protests
that this capital had witnessed since 1977.
Young people, old people.
Poor people, rich people,
middle class people.
Men, women, students.
Everybody was there. Everybody was there.
I arrived on Tahrir Square with 15 people.
14 out of the 15
never demonstrated in their lives
before 20th March 2003.
It was like, for the first time,
we could see a popular movement.
From 30,000 to 40,000
or 50,000, even, protestors
were in run-in clashes in with the police.
Briefly taking over Tahrir.
That really was a turning point.
The protests here were huge
on the night of the Iraq invasion.
It was the first time I had ever seen
that protestors had overwhelmed
the security forces.
They withdrew,
and I remember a comrade, a friend,
said, "Oh, my God, oh, my God, oh, my God."
For the first time, the really first time,
we are able to win this small victory.
The American occupation of Iraq
is the occupation of the entire Arab world,
including Egypt,
and therefore, the impotency
of our regime is very clear.
That's exactly when I was thinking,
and others,
that if we were triple that number,
or four times that number,
we could take down Mubarak.
Little did we know
that that was a rehearsal
for the 2011 revolution.
That spring of 2003
was really the beginning
of the democracy movement.
Iraq was torn to shreds.
It was a consequence of the invasion,
but it wasn't presented that way.
Like the Fallujah attack,
which was a major war crime.
For example, I haven't seen a word
in the United States,
in the mainstream, at least,
about the fact that the radiation levels
and effects of excessive radiation
in Fallujah
are apparently worse than Hiroshima.
We know exactly how many people were
killed on September 11th, exactly.
We have no idea how many civilians
were killed in Iraq.
Why is that?
Hey, back up! Back up!
Sure, Saddam Hussein was awful.
He was a murderer.
But when Saddam was harming
his own people, that was on him.
But the American invasion is on us,
and the people who are harmed
post-invasion is on us.
It's on our collective national conscience.
Every person is important,
and we should know exactly
how many people have died
as a result of this invasion.
This was a total failure.
Cost, most of all for the Iraqis,
lives and property
and now ten years near anarchy.
My father fled Iraq
when I was barely a year old.
I have all my life been an opposition
figure to the Baathist regime.
But as horrendous and as dark
and as bad and as miserable
as things got in Iraq under Saddam Hussein,
incredibly enough,
now they are far, far worse.
That's what we were there for
on 15th February 2003.
To stop this from happening.
My husband is going
to make a short statement.
He has felt extremely upset
of the injustice of the war,
and he remains very upset.
Professor Stephen Hawking.
The war was based on two lies.
The first was that we were in danger
from weapons of mass destruction.
The second was that Iraq
was somehow to blame for 9/11.
It has been a tragedy for all
the families that have lost members.
As many as 100,000 may have died,
half of them women and children.
If that is not a war crime, what is?
The deaths in Iraq mount daily,
but we haven't had a running total
or indeed an accurate body count.
Now we have a shocking figure.
American and Iraqi
public health experts calculate
that about 600,000 Iraqis have been
killed as a result of the invasion.
by the Iraq war, 1.25 million.
chronic malnutrition, 28 percent.
The number of refugees created
by the Iraq war, four million.
So tonight I'm gonna do one of my slideshows.
These are actual unstaged photos
pulled from the files
of the White House photo office.
Those weapons of mass destruction
have got to be somewhere.
Nope. No weapons over there.
Maybe under here.
Yes, there are consequences of war.
People will die and some will be innocent,
and we must live with the consequences
of our actions,
even the unintended ones.
I wanted to ask him,
"Have you ever seen what happens
as somebody rolls a grenade into a tent?"
"Have you ever imagined what it would be like
to kneel down beside a soldier
you sent into battle
and tell him why he's dying?"
Well, I'd never say that the mass loss
of life of those in the conflict,
civilians, is worth intervention.
But I would say that,
were I in the same situation
with the same information
and the same perspective,
I would have done the same again.
I mean, now we know so much more.
I believed, and I believe,
that the decision was right.
The Secretary General of the United Nations,
a man who's always insisted
that America and Britain went to war
without the legally required authority
of the UN.
Well, Kofi Annan was asked
whether he thought that the action was legal.
I have stated clearly
that it was not in conformity
with the Security Council,
with the UN Charter.
And then the next question was,
"So you mean it was illegal?"
Translation
Translate and read this script in other languages:
Select another language:
- - Select -
- 简体中文 (Chinese - Simplified)
- 繁體中文 (Chinese - Traditional)
- Español (Spanish)
- Esperanto (Esperanto)
- 日本語 (Japanese)
- Português (Portuguese)
- Deutsch (German)
- العربية (Arabic)
- Français (French)
- Русский (Russian)
- ಕನ್ನಡ (Kannada)
- 한국어 (Korean)
- עברית (Hebrew)
- Gaeilge (Irish)
- Українська (Ukrainian)
- اردو (Urdu)
- Magyar (Hungarian)
- मानक हिन्दी (Hindi)
- Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Italiano (Italian)
- தமிழ் (Tamil)
- Türkçe (Turkish)
- తెలుగు (Telugu)
- ภาษาไทย (Thai)
- Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
- Čeština (Czech)
- Polski (Polish)
- Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Românește (Romanian)
- Nederlands (Dutch)
- Ελληνικά (Greek)
- Latinum (Latin)
- Svenska (Swedish)
- Dansk (Danish)
- Suomi (Finnish)
- فارسی (Persian)
- ייִדיש (Yiddish)
- հայերեն (Armenian)
- Norsk (Norwegian)
- English (English)
Citation
Use the citation below to add this screenplay to your bibliography:
Style:MLAChicagoAPA
"We Are Many" Scripts.com. STANDS4 LLC, 2024. Web. 22 Nov. 2024. <https://www.scripts.com/script/we_are_many_23146>.
Discuss this script with the community:
Report Comment
We're doing our best to make sure our content is useful, accurate and safe.
If by any chance you spot an inappropriate comment while navigating through our website please use this form to let us know, and we'll take care of it shortly.
Attachment
You need to be logged in to favorite.
Log In