We Feed the World Page #4
- Year:
- 2005
- 96 min
- 327 Views
The taste is not a criterion.
We are in one of our 80 factories
fattening.
This is a very large plant
and its equipment is modern.
Everything is computer controlled.
Can be monitored by aeration,
heating and water consumption.
If you look at the hen house
we see that there
many animals inside.
It is an obligation
because the problem,
is that a farmer makes a living
that raising a large number of parts.
During a harsh winter,
eg
heating costs increasing,
margin
the breeder may be near zero.
It varies
between almost nothing
and 20 cents per piece.
To be able to live his activity
it must produce an adequate number of parts.
Here is the delivery area
poultry.
The live chickens are delivered
In these baskets transportation.
The room has light blue
undetectable in the eyes of animals.
They feel
to be in a dark
which the calm.
The goal is that animals are not stressed
before slaughter.
The cages are emptied on conveyor
and animals are directed towards
the slaughter line.
Here the electric stunner.
Inside there is a pool of water so! voltage us.
The heads of the birds are dipped in
and they lose consciousness.
When they leave the stunner,
they are killed by the rotating blade.
In our slaughterhouse
we kill about 12 million birds a year,
which corresponds to an average
OOO 50 cattle per day.
Poultry consumption
is much larger
than in the past.
It is indeed an affordable meat
can be produced easily.
When you look at the amounts currently consumed
one wonders whether it could
to produce as much biologically.
It is now proved that
in the agrarian sector,
any globalizing
and that relocating production.
Is not made, where people eat
but in regions
where you can
produce cheap food.
In our industry
Ie greatest danger
comes from Asia and South America
where the largest producers of poultry
.
They have the possibility
can both export
poultry parts as the international market research
and for disposal of other
their domestic market.
Free trade does not exist.
This is a lie.
Only dominates the fittest.
For example, when Nestl opposes a union
African peasant
it's like Mike Tyson, Ie
world champion boxing
was sent on ring
against a Bengali unemployed
starving.
The power of the largest multinational
expressed through a single digit
as the World Bank published last year.
In 2005
520 / o of gross world product,
ie
wealth produced in a year worldwide,
Was checked
by five hundred companies.
And the sole purpose of these multinationals
is profit maximization.
The largest company
food,
one that employs almost 300 people OOO,
which is active on five continents
and control 8000 marks
is Nestl.
Nestl is currently headed
a friendly Austrian bronzed
UV:
obeys itself
to the internal logic of the enterprise:
maximize
profits by avoiding taxes.
And if it fails,
annually
astronomical profits
for...
Shareholders
then, it will be ejected.
And the enormous power it has today
Hundreds of millions of people
will do him no help.
Profit maximization
deadly is strategy
hierarchies multinationals.
My name is Peter Brabeck
and I was born in Villach in Carinthia.
For seven years now,
I am responsible
Nestl Group
's largest food group
world.
Our turnover is about
90 billion Swiss francs
approximately $ 65 billion
and we directly employ
275 OOO employees about.
It is therefore
a fairly large ship.
We are global company
27th Ia.
It is believed that
now all that is natural is good.
This is a big change,
because, until recently,
We were taught that nature is ruthless.
The man is now able
manage the balance of nature,
but despite this,
doctrine spreads
that instills the idea
all that comes
nature is good.
The bio is a good example.
Ll there would be nothing better.
The bio is not better.
After 15 years of
consumption of genetically modified foods
no disease appeared
United States until now.
But in Europe, we were worried
what could happen to us.
We swim, I think, in full
hypocrisy.
A folk song
from home says:
hollera holleri.''
Do you remember?
The water is of course
Ia raw
largest on Earth.
The question is:
whether to privatize or not
water supply.
Two views clash on this issue.
The first
that I would call extreme
is represented by NGOs,
for whom access to water
should be nationalized.
Other words, every human being
must have access to water.
This is an extreme solution.
And the other says
that water is a foodstuff
and that, like any commodity,
it has a market value.
It is preferable, in my opinion,
to give a value to a commodity
so that we are all aware
it has a cost,
And we take appropriate measures
for
segments of the population who do not have access to this water.
Ll
are solutions that should be implemented.
I sincerely believe
that the primary responsibility of a CEO
is to ensure and preserve
a profitable future and every success
its company.
For only if we can sustain our business
we can
participate actively in solving problems
worldwide.
We can create jobs.
We created 275 by OOO
with a further 1.2 million
Ies
that directly depend on us.
What makes a total of 4.5 million people
:
Each employee depends
Indeed, three other people.
It is therefore
4.5 million people
directly dependent on us.
To create jobs,
you have to work yourself.
And no, as before,
distribute working time.
The main argument, remember,
supporters
the week of 35 hours
work that was available was limited
.
It was therefore necessary that we work less
to improve its allocation.
A proof of the facts,
it proved a bad solution.
To create more jobs, more work is needed
.
Ll need to create a positive image of the world
and I see no reason
not see the future positively
.
We have never had such easy lives
we have never had much money
,
we have never been healthier
and we have never lived so long
that right now.
We have everything we want
, and yet we
of melancholy.
Japanese.
You can see here
how these companies are
modern, ultra robotic
and employ few people...
Translations asshide
Translation
Translate and read this script in other languages:
Select another language:
- - Select -
- 简体中文 (Chinese - Simplified)
- 繁體中文 (Chinese - Traditional)
- Español (Spanish)
- Esperanto (Esperanto)
- 日本語 (Japanese)
- Português (Portuguese)
- Deutsch (German)
- العربية (Arabic)
- Français (French)
- Русский (Russian)
- ಕನ್ನಡ (Kannada)
- 한국어 (Korean)
- עברית (Hebrew)
- Gaeilge (Irish)
- Українська (Ukrainian)
- اردو (Urdu)
- Magyar (Hungarian)
- मानक हिन्दी (Hindi)
- Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Italiano (Italian)
- தமிழ் (Tamil)
- Türkçe (Turkish)
- తెలుగు (Telugu)
- ภาษาไทย (Thai)
- Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
- Čeština (Czech)
- Polski (Polish)
- Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Românește (Romanian)
- Nederlands (Dutch)
- Ελληνικά (Greek)
- Latinum (Latin)
- Svenska (Swedish)
- Dansk (Danish)
- Suomi (Finnish)
- فارسی (Persian)
- ייִדיש (Yiddish)
- հայերեն (Armenian)
- Norsk (Norwegian)
- English (English)
Citation
Use the citation below to add this screenplay to your bibliography:
Style:MLAChicagoAPA
"We Feed the World" Scripts.com. STANDS4 LLC, 2025. Web. 19 Jan. 2025. <https://www.scripts.com/script/we_feed_the_world_23157>.
Discuss this script with the community:
Report Comment
We're doing our best to make sure our content is useful, accurate and safe.
If by any chance you spot an inappropriate comment while navigating through our website please use this form to let us know, and we'll take care of it shortly.
Attachment
You need to be logged in to favorite.
Log In