Whitey: United States of America v. James J. Bulger Page #8
in the 1980s by the name
of Lawrence Sarhatt.
In this memorandum, Sarhatt says
that he had a conversation
with James Bulger when they met
at a hotel. And the government pretends
that this memorandum somehow shows
James Bulger is an informant.
So, during the trial
we learn information
that there's a secret safe
in the Boston SAC,
that's Special Agent in Charge's office
in the C3 unit of the FBl,
the criminal division, and in that safe,
supposedly documents will go into
and never come out again.
We also learned
that there was a secretary
who had worked for decades
in the Boston FBI.
She's 82 years old, and still working
for the Boston FBI.
So, she is the person who knows
whether or not a secret safe exists.
Brennan:
When we calledthis secretary as a witness,
mysteriously new documents appeared.
While they told the jury
and the public
- This is the truth at this trial...
- Man:
At this trial.what we learned
when we called the secretary
that existed.
The same exact memo
that the government introduced
at this trial from the same person,
exact copy of it,
we learned that the memo
was not complete,
because there's
an observation section.
Mr. Sarhatt says, "I am not certain
that I am convinced
the informant is telling
the full story of his involvement.
Consideration should be given
to closing him
and making him a target."
So what do they do
with this information?
Well, the government at this trial,
leaves that part out until we expose it.
What else did they do with
the information back in 1980?
We'd learn from the secretary exactly
what they did with that information.
The actual memorandum
that was given to her,
she put in an envelope
by direction of Mr. Sarhatt,
and put in the safe.
And it says, "Strictly Eyes-Only."
Nobody other than the Special Agent
in Charge should see it.
And anytime a new Special Agent
In Charge would come in
and take the place of an old one
who was resigning or moving on,
she would tell them
about this document in the safe,
and it stayed in that safe
for generations
of Special Agents in Charge
when they took each other's spot.
And one Special Agent In Charge
said, "Get rid of this,
or we'll all get fired."
What could be so terrible
about this document
that they would lose their job?
That James Bulger was an informant?
Would that be so terrible
everybody would get fired?
Or that they knew
he wasn't an informant,
they knew that he
should've been targeted,
and he was being protected.
Kelly:
The defense complainingabout the Sarhatt memo
is another desperate tactic by them,
which is another version of,
"Let's pretend,"
because they are pretending
they didn't have these documents,
which they did. There's nothing sinister
about it, it was disclosed.
They had it. And it didn't...
it didn't prove anything,
other than the fact that
there was a head of the FBI
who was concerned about
keeping Bulger open as an informant.
If anything, the Sarhatt memo
proves Bulger was an informant.
He sat with the head of
and gave them all sorts of information,
most of which was useless,
but in fact, he was
reporting it to the FBl,
and that makes him an informant.
Woman:
The latest twist in the trialof James Whitey Bulger.
Man:
On Tuesday, Stephen Rakes wasdropped from the witness list.
Woman 2:
Rakes had been set to testify,but prosecutors told him he was
take the stand.
Thirty years of torment, and
now it's coming to an end.
(phone ringing)
Hello. No, I haven't been
able to get...
because I haven't been able
to get a hold of him or anything.
Yeah, he's probably
They took him off the witness list.
I tried calling him after court,
and his phone went right to voicemail.
I call him all day yesterday,
same, after court, same thing.
So, I'm going to go over.
I figure, give him
a little time to cool down.
Yeah.
(indistinct voice on phone)
Yeah.
Where?
I don't know, what was
the body described like?
That's him.
That's him.
Motherf***er.
I'm going by his house right now.
Yeah, I'll call you
right back, bye.
- He's dead.
- Woman:
He's dead?What, what?
What? What happened?
They found him on
the side of the road in Lincoln.
Woman:
In Lincoln, Massachusetts?Yeah.
Woman:
Who's in Lincoln,Massachusetts?
I gotta go by his house right now.
Woman:
Who's in...Oh, my God, no way.
Man:
Stephen Rakes is a courthouseregular, coming each day
to the Whitey Bulger trial, waiting
for the day when he would testify,
but Rakes would never
get that chance.
See the corruption?
Woman:
Well, wait,let's not jump to conclusions.
Let's say a prayer that he's okay.
- He's not here.
- Woman:
Oh, my God.- Woman:
Is his car here, Stephen?- No.
Woman:
Oh, my God. Can you goknock on the door and see?
Davis:
I knew something was wrong,because I talk to him every day,
we meet for coffee.
(ringing doorbell)
You know, and that's got
my stomach turned, thinking,
"Is anyone else in danger?"
With his testimony,
I used to say to him,
"Steve, what do you have to say?
I mean, what is it?"
"Oh, you'll see, you'll see.
Believe me, you'll see how deep
the people... you'll see."
Woman:
Key witness inthe Whitey Bulger trial is dead.
Woman 2:
A source tells CNN,authorities called the death suspicious.
Man:
We don't know what the causeof death was, no sign of trauma.
Don't know if this was a suicide.
Man 2:
It's a very suspicious death.And the body is seven miles away
from where his automobile was,
and he did not have
any identification on him.
death was a heart attack,
an aneurysm, you know, and is it?
Do you believe what they tell you,
or did something really happen?
Do you trust your people that are
supposed to serve and protect
when you know
what we're living through,
and what's happened in this family?
What is the truth anymore,
and who do you believe?
Sometimes, you know, I wish
that this never happened.
This life... because all the hurt.
I've had a lot of hurt, Joe,
I mean, from...
I'm talking from... I can remember
far back as four or five years old.
I don't have any faith no more.
I want the truth.
This has tied me up for 32 years.
They say, you know, ease your pain.
And honestly, Joe, I got to tell you this,
and I say it with my throat,
I'd kill this cocksucker
if they ever let him go free,
and I'd tell the...
Tell the judge that and I wouldn't
give a f*** about going away for it.
This prick here is never gonna
run free, because I...
I mean it, I'd take him out.
Man:
Prosecutors put former hit manJohn Martorano on the stand
to prove that Bulger's reign
was murderous.
Woman:
Martorano was perhapsthe most feared member
of Bulger's Winter Hill Gang.
Translation
Translate and read this script in other languages:
Select another language:
- - Select -
- 简体中文 (Chinese - Simplified)
- 繁體中文 (Chinese - Traditional)
- Español (Spanish)
- Esperanto (Esperanto)
- 日本語 (Japanese)
- Português (Portuguese)
- Deutsch (German)
- العربية (Arabic)
- Français (French)
- Русский (Russian)
- ಕನ್ನಡ (Kannada)
- 한국어 (Korean)
- עברית (Hebrew)
- Gaeilge (Irish)
- Українська (Ukrainian)
- اردو (Urdu)
- Magyar (Hungarian)
- मानक हिन्दी (Hindi)
- Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Italiano (Italian)
- தமிழ் (Tamil)
- Türkçe (Turkish)
- తెలుగు (Telugu)
- ภาษาไทย (Thai)
- Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
- Čeština (Czech)
- Polski (Polish)
- Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Românește (Romanian)
- Nederlands (Dutch)
- Ελληνικά (Greek)
- Latinum (Latin)
- Svenska (Swedish)
- Dansk (Danish)
- Suomi (Finnish)
- فارسی (Persian)
- ייִדיש (Yiddish)
- հայերեն (Armenian)
- Norsk (Norwegian)
- English (English)
Citation
Use the citation below to add this screenplay to your bibliography:
Style:MLAChicagoAPA
"Whitey: United States of America v. James J. Bulger" Scripts.com. STANDS4 LLC, 2025. Web. 19 Jan. 2025. <https://www.scripts.com/script/whitey:_united_states_of_america_v._james_j._bulger_23409>.
Discuss this script with the community:
Report Comment
We're doing our best to make sure our content is useful, accurate and safe.
If by any chance you spot an inappropriate comment while navigating through our website please use this form to let us know, and we'll take care of it shortly.
Attachment
You need to be logged in to favorite.
Log In