Who Killed The Electric Car? Page #4
the Bush administration
made another announcement.
Tonight, I'm proposing 1.2 billion
dollars in research funding
so that America can
lead the world in developing clean,
hydrogen-powered automobiles.
The federal government joined
the car and oil industries
to embrace a new
clean car of the future.
With more than a billion
federal dollars up for grabs,
over the next few years,
the campaign for hydrogen fuel cell vehicles
began to sway California.
Hello there and welcome
to the California Fuel Cell Partnership
where we're fuelling the future in
a new and enviromentally friendly way.
Automakers, energy
and technology providers,
along with government agencies
are voluntarily working together
to commercialize the
fuel cell for cars and buses.
Soon you may see some of these cars
cruising through your
very own neighborhood.
We will not just dream about
the hydrogen fuelling stations.
We will not just dream about the
hydrogen cars. We will build it.
The hydrogen Hummer is not a production
vehicle, it's a concept vehicle.
It's a way for governor
Schwarzenegger to have a property
at various events that ge
goes to when he unveils
a new hydrogen refuelling station.
At LAX for example.
building of a hydrogen highway
to take us to the
environmental future.
While hydrogen fuel cells offered an exciting
alternative sometime in the future
the technology of today?
What would happen to the electric car?
It all came down to a decisive meeting
at California's Air Resources Board.
Citizens and industry alike
vote on the fate of the electric car.
I'd also like to thank
all the other stakeholders,
particularly also,
the auto industry
who is going to have a major impact here.
I like the fact that
hydrogen might be in a position
to displace the petroleum products.
I share your optimism on fuel cells,
just not to the extent.
I think it's a bait and switch
strategy. I hope I'm wrong.
I'm concerned that we've picked numbers
that are based entirely on fuel cells.
What if fuel cells don't work?
It seems that most of the
recent changes to the mandate
have been designed to ease
the burden on the automakers.
You're part of the
environmental protection agency,
not the corporate profit protection agency.
I think that we've been a
contributor to this marketplace to...
I agree. But remember
there are many of you.
We're not giving more time
to the auto manufacturers.
Lou Browning had the job
to present the report,
and he'd been promised ten minutes.
- One of the things we've found is...
- Dr Browning,
I would appreciate if you could
summarize this in three minutes.
Okay, I thought I had ten, but...
Alan Lloyd cut him off,
whereas he had given the automakers
unlimited time earlier in the day.
The improvements we need in
fuel cells are mainly to get the cost down.
In addition, we have recently certified and
introduced the Honda FCX fuel cell vehicle.
Largely this work has been pushed forward
through the California Fuel Cell Partnership
which has been very valuable in
pulling together the diverse interests.
Any new information on
batteries that didn't mesh
with overall conclusions was just
shut out very fast by Alan Lloyd.
Let's get it clear. I'm not trying
to show any bias or anything here.
There were 80 people who came
and only two industry representatives
on the side to kill the mandate.
We have four people out of 78
who are supporting this proposal.
How did we end up with this?
This is a tough, tough program.
It's a revolutionary program.
It pushes the automakers hard.
And they don't like it,
and they push back hard.
As you deliberate today
on the fate of this program,
I urge you to summon
all of your political courage
to make the hard choices that you
know you need to make on this program.
Because when it comes to protecting
the health of the people of California,
there are simply no more
easy choices to make.
I saw this as losing
a wonderful opportunity
that we have really invested a great
deal in the infrastructure, in the technology...
It was like the rug was pulled out.
They gave it away.
And to me that is just sad.
It's a sad commentary on
the way our society
and our system in the United States works.
When GM introduced the EV1,
California was setting the toughest auto
pollution standards in the nation.
were to be zero emission vehicles.
But California dropped those standards
after being sued by automakers.
A lot of the vehicles, the Honda vehicles,
were all leased, and
nobody had the option to buy.
So the automakers took advantage of
that and pulled all the cars off the road.
They weren't willing to
let people take the cars
and actually drive them and
keep driving them like normal cars.
When I noticed that GM was losing interest
was when I wanted to re-lease
my car, and they wouldn't let me.
I've never had a product
I've had to beg and fight
and cajole and persist so much to get.
And then I had to try and beg and fight
and find any way
possible to try and keep.
- They didn't give you the option...
- They didn't give you an option to buy.
They said:
"Thank you for leasing the car.Goodbye. That's it."
"Turn it in by such and such a date,
or you're going to be held liable."
GM had very quietly gone about taking
cars back, without anybody saying very much
other than some of the drivers
that complained
but never in a big, organized fashion.
They had no choice but to turn them in
or face legal consequences of stealing a car.
To my knowledge all the cars were
turned in because people had too much to lose.
To this day, the automakers
have fought anyone understanding
how much demand there was,
and how much demand that there is.
So we decided we were going to fight them
in whatever way we could,
and we became organized.
Across California drivers held
protests to save electric cars.
"...it turned my head around
about electric cars."
"And it broke me of my addiction to oil. "
Unable to change policy,
activists staged a funeral
to raise public awareness.
It was the same month as
in southern California in five years.
I was an EV1 driver, still am, from
when GM will have to pry it
out of my charger's dead cold hands.
What the detractors and the critics of
electric vehicles have been saying for years
is true. The electric vehicle
is not for everybody.
Given the limited range, it can only meet
the needs of 90% of the population.
People used to ask me:
"Why do you do what you do?"
And I say, especially
after my son had told them:
"I figure if I do my job well enough,
"my son will never know a time before
there were electric cars on the road."
And he rode in an EV1 on the
way over here, and he said:
"I wish we could keep the EV1 for a long time."
Translation
Translate and read this script in other languages:
Select another language:
- - Select -
- 简体中文 (Chinese - Simplified)
- 繁體中文 (Chinese - Traditional)
- Español (Spanish)
- Esperanto (Esperanto)
- 日本語 (Japanese)
- Português (Portuguese)
- Deutsch (German)
- العربية (Arabic)
- Français (French)
- Русский (Russian)
- ಕನ್ನಡ (Kannada)
- 한국어 (Korean)
- עברית (Hebrew)
- Gaeilge (Irish)
- Українська (Ukrainian)
- اردو (Urdu)
- Magyar (Hungarian)
- मानक हिन्दी (Hindi)
- Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Italiano (Italian)
- தமிழ் (Tamil)
- Türkçe (Turkish)
- తెలుగు (Telugu)
- ภาษาไทย (Thai)
- Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
- Čeština (Czech)
- Polski (Polish)
- Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Românește (Romanian)
- Nederlands (Dutch)
- Ελληνικά (Greek)
- Latinum (Latin)
- Svenska (Swedish)
- Dansk (Danish)
- Suomi (Finnish)
- فارسی (Persian)
- ייִדיש (Yiddish)
- հայերեն (Armenian)
- Norsk (Norwegian)
- English (English)
Citation
Use the citation below to add this screenplay to your bibliography:
Style:MLAChicagoAPA
"Who Killed The Electric Car?" Scripts.com. STANDS4 LLC, 2024. Web. 22 Dec. 2024. <https://www.scripts.com/script/who_killed_the_electric_car_23420>.
Discuss this script with the community:
Report Comment
We're doing our best to make sure our content is useful, accurate and safe.
If by any chance you spot an inappropriate comment while navigating through our website please use this form to let us know, and we'll take care of it shortly.
Attachment
You need to be logged in to favorite.
Log In