WikiRebels: The Documentary Page #2
- Year:
- 2010
- 58 min
- 96 Views
However, the word spreads
among activists far and wide on the Net,
eventually reaching the German Chaos Computer Club,
for hackers in the world.
from a couple of friends.
but I started to understand
the value of such a project to society.
The politically engaged Chaos Computer Club
has been fighting a long-term battle
for free access to information.
One of its members, Daniel Domscheit-Berg,
is quick to recognise the common ground
between his view of society and that of WikiLeaks'.
He quits his job as a computer consultant
so as to devote all of his time to the new organisation.
The question is the attitude.
What attitude do you have to society?
Do you look at what there is
and you accept that as God given?
Or do you see society
as something where you identify a problem
and then you find a
creative solution for that problem?
So it is a matter of, are you a spectator
or are you actively participating in society?
The computer club has put the skills of some of
in the world at WikiLeaks' disposal.
What's needed now is a physical haven.
Hackers linked to the Swedish file
sharing site Pirate Bay
have what they need -
considerable technical skills
in a place where
freedom of speech is unusually free.
A lot of the countries in today's world
do not have really strong laws for the media anymore.
But a few countries -
like, for instance, Belgium,
also the United States with the First Amendment,
and especially, for example, Sweden -
have very strong laws protecting the media
and the work of investigative or general journalists.
So, from our perspective, this is something.
you have to make sure that your country
is really one of the strongholds of freedom of information.
Sweden has an enviable,
although far-from-perfect record
in protecting publications.
It has a practical record within the past few years
of protecting internet publications
against censorship.
And it's precisely Sweden's
that prompts WikiLeaks
in this unpretentious basement
in one of Stockholm's inner suburbs.
PRQ offer their customers total secrecy.
from eavesdropping
either WikiLeaks chat pages
or finding out who sent what to who.
been uh...the hardest ISP you can find in the world.
There's just no-one else
that bothers less about lawyers harassing them,
about content they are hosting.
And it's just the attitude that, let's say,
works very well with
what WikiLeaks was set out to do.
One reason why WikiLeaks need PRQ is
that their operations
are protected by Sweden's strict freedom of expression laws -
laws which PRQ exploit to the full.
And we aren't talking about any old information.
It's from these servers at PRQ
that WikiLeaks has,
for example, made public a manual
from the United States Guantanamo Bay detention centre.
A military manual leaked on the internet
is revealing details of the way
terror suspects are being treated
at the US naval base at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba.
It tells of the use of solitary
confinement and humiliation
to break down the detainees mentally.
Human rights groups have for years
been asking the US administration
for access to this manual.
If you censor
important material of this type,
we're not just gonna criticise you,
we're going to take the material
that you try to censor
and we're going to spray it all over the world.
And we're gonna stick it in our archives
in a way that it's never gonna disappear,
and encourage everyone to get copies of it.
WikiLeaks' battle against censorship
knows no geographical frontiers.
Their next step is to publish an internal report
commissioned by the multinational trading company Trafigura,
who are alleged to have dumped toxic waste in the Ivory Coast
that caused tens of thousands of people to seek medical care.
'The Guardian' newspaper
was going to produce a big story on this,
and, as a result, they were gagged.
The company obtained a secret order in court
to gag all the press in the UK
from reporting anything related to the content of that report
and the fact that they had been gagged.
In the US, hackers discover
that the Republican presidential
candidate Sarah Palin
is apparently bypassing US transparency laws
by using a private email account to conduct government business.
WikiLeaks publishes her messages.
After just two years
the site's made public
over a million secret documents.
But WikiLeaks, as an organisation,
continues to be largely shrouded in secrecy.
Daniel Domscheit-Berg appear in public -
the latter under the pseudonym 'Schmidt'.
OK. Hello, everybody.
My name is Daniel Schmidt. This is Julian Assange.
We're here to make a short presentation
about the WikiLeaks project.
According to 'The National',
which is something we are kind of proud,
it's one of the last quotes we had,
so 'The National' has said that we have produced
more scoops in our short existence
than the 'The Washington Post' in the last 30 years.
Their publication activities
soon lead to counterattacks.
When WikiLeaks released lists of censored websites,
internet service providers in a number of countries,
including Thailand, China
and Iran, shut them down.
The more sensitive the material they publish,
the more often WikiLeaks
become the object of lawsuits and threats.
WikiLeaks now attracts the attention
of the US intelligence,
who, in a classified report,
claimed that the site is a threat to national security
and suggest ways of shutting it down.
Priority is put on finding
the individuals leaking the information.
The US intelligence, however,
only manage to keep the report secret a short while
before it's leaked to WikiLeaks.
WikiLeaks need to find more and safer havens
from which they can publish their information.
A sequence of events now starts
on an island in the middle of the North Atlantic,
which, while it leads to more censorship efforts,
will also create new opportunities for WikiLeaks.
October came, October 2008,
and the Icelandic banking system imploded.
It lost seventeen-eighteenths of its mass
over the course of about a week or two.
It was essentially one bank per week went bankrupt.
WikiLeaks obtain material that show
how Iceland's catastrophic bank collapses
were partly due to
cronyism, or favouritism,
carelessness and secretiveness.
When this highly detailed
document is put out on the Net,
the bank launches a counterattack.
Well, the first time I ever heard of WikiLeaks
was in the beginning of August 2009.
I was working as a reporter for the state television
when I got a tip that this website
Translation
Translate and read this script in other languages:
Select another language:
- - Select -
- 简体中文 (Chinese - Simplified)
- 繁體中文 (Chinese - Traditional)
- Español (Spanish)
- Esperanto (Esperanto)
- 日本語 (Japanese)
- Português (Portuguese)
- Deutsch (German)
- العربية (Arabic)
- Français (French)
- Русский (Russian)
- ಕನ್ನಡ (Kannada)
- 한국어 (Korean)
- עברית (Hebrew)
- Gaeilge (Irish)
- Українська (Ukrainian)
- اردو (Urdu)
- Magyar (Hungarian)
- मानक हिन्दी (Hindi)
- Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Italiano (Italian)
- தமிழ் (Tamil)
- Türkçe (Turkish)
- తెలుగు (Telugu)
- ภาษาไทย (Thai)
- Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
- Čeština (Czech)
- Polski (Polish)
- Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Românește (Romanian)
- Nederlands (Dutch)
- Ελληνικά (Greek)
- Latinum (Latin)
- Svenska (Swedish)
- Dansk (Danish)
- Suomi (Finnish)
- فارسی (Persian)
- ייִדיש (Yiddish)
- հայերեն (Armenian)
- Norsk (Norwegian)
- English (English)
Citation
Use the citation below to add this screenplay to your bibliography:
Style:MLAChicagoAPA
"WikiRebels: The Documentary" Scripts.com. STANDS4 LLC, 2024. Web. 21 Nov. 2024. <https://www.scripts.com/script/wikirebels:_the_documentary_23458>.
Discuss this script with the community:
Report Comment
We're doing our best to make sure our content is useful, accurate and safe.
If by any chance you spot an inappropriate comment while navigating through our website please use this form to let us know, and we'll take care of it shortly.
Attachment
You need to be logged in to favorite.
Log In