Witness for the Prosecution Page #7
- NOT RATED
- Year:
- 1957
- 116 min
- 4,779 Views
taken and the premises fingerprinted.
- What fingerprints did you discover?
- I found the fingerprints of Mrs French,
those of Janet McKenzie, and some which
later proved to be those of Leonard Vole.
- No others?
- No others.
Did you say the room had the appearance
that a robbery had been committed?
Yes. Things were strewn about and the
window had been broken near the catch.
There was glass on the floor,
and fragments were found outside.
The glass outside was not consistent with
the window being forced from the outside.
You're saying that someone made it look
as if it had been forced from the outside?
My lord, I must object. My learned friend
is putting words in the witness' mouth.
After all, if he insists
on answering his own questions,
the presence of the witness
would seem superfluous.
Quite. Don't you think so, Mr Myers?
Yes, my lord.
Inspector,
did you ascertain if any of the murdered
woman's property was missing?
According to the housekeeper,
nothing was missing.
In your experience, Inspector,
when burglars or burglaresses
break into a house,
do they leave without taking anything?
No, sir.
- Do you produce a jacket, Inspector?
- Yes, sir.
Is that the jacket?
- Yes, sir.
- That is exhibit P1, my lord.
Where did you find this, Inspector?
That is the jacket
found in the prisoner's flat,
which I handed to our lab
to test for bloodstains.
- And did you find any bloodstains?
- Yes.
Though an attempt
had been made to wash them out.
What tests were made?
First to determine
if the stains were human blood,
then to classify it by group or type.
And was the blood
of a particular group or type?
Yes, sir. It is type O.
And did you subsequently
test the blood of the dead woman?
- Yes, sir.
- What type was that?
- The same. Type O.
- (murmuring)
Thank you, Inspector.
No further questions.
Inspector, you say the only fingerprints
you found were those of Mrs French,
Janet McKenzie and Leonard Vole.
In your experience, when a burglar breaks
in, does he usually leave fingerprints
- or does he wear gloves?
- He wears gloves.
So the absence
of fingerprints in a robbery
- No, sir.
Can't we surmise the burglar might have
entered a presumably empty house,
suddenly encountered
then, realising she was dead,
I submit, my lord,
that it is entirely impossible
to guess what went on in the mind
of some entirely imaginary burglar.
With or without gloves.
Let us not surmise, Sir Wilfrid,
but confine ourselves to facts.
Inspector, when you questioned
the prisoner as to the stains on his jacket,
did he not show you
a recently-healed scar on his wrist,
- saying he had cut himself slicing bread?
- Yes, sir, that is what he said.
And were you not told
the same thing by his wife?
- Yes, sir. But afterwards...
- Just a simple yes or no, please.
Did the prisoner's wife show you a knife
and tell you that her husband
had cut his wrist while slicing bread?
- Yes, sir.
- I will ask you to examine this knife.
Just test the edge of it
with your finger. Carefully!
You agree that the point
and the cutting edge are razor-sharp?
- Yes, sir.
- Now, if such a knife were to slip,
might it not inflict a cut
Yes, sir, it might.
Inspector, you stated that the bloodstains
on the prisoner's jacket were analysed,
as was the blood of Mrs French, and
they were both found to be of group O.
- That is correct.
- However,
if the prisoner's blood
were also of this same group,
then the stains on his jacket
may well have resulted
from the household accident
he described to you.
Yes, sir.
Did you examine
the prisoner's blood, Inspector?
No, sir.
I have here a certificate
stating that Leonard Stephen Vole
is a blood donor
And that his blood is group O.
(murmuring)
Thank you, Inspector.
Inspector, granted that the cut
on the wrist was caused by that knife,
whether it was an accident
or done deliberately after the murder
to account for the bloodstains?
- Oh, really, my lord!
- I withdraw the question.
You may stand down.
- Call Janet McKenzie.
- Janet McKenzie.
- Janet McKenzie.
- Janet McKenzie.
that the evidence...
(buzzer)
...the truth, the whole truth
and nothing but the truth.
Carter. Carter. Pill. Pill.
- Your name is Janet McKenzie?
- Aye, that's my name.
- When did you first come to London?
- That was many years ago. 28 years ago.
- Where do you live?
- Now that Mrs French, poor soul, is dead,
I've moved in with my niece
at 19 Glenister Road.
You were companion-housekeeper
to the late Mrs Emily French?
I was her housekeeper!
I've no opinion of companions,
poor feckless bodies, afraid
of a bit of honest domestic work.
I meant you were on friendly terms, not
altogether those of mistress and servant.
Aye. Ten years I was with her
She knew me and she trusted me.
Many's the time
I prevented her doing a foolish thing.
Please tell us, in your own words, about
the events of the evening of October 14.
It was a Friday and my night out. I was
going to see my niece at Glenister Road,
which is about five minutes' walk.
I left the house at half past seven.
I promised to take her
a dress pattern that she admired.
- Och, is this thing necessary?
- An excellent question.
However, it has been installed at
considerable expense to the taxpayers,
so let us take advantage of it.
Please continue.
Well, when I got to my niece's,
I found I'd left the pattern behind.
back to get it as it was no distance.
I got back to the house at 25 past 9.
I let myself in
and went upstairs to my room.
As I passed the sitting room, I heard the
prisoner in there, talking to Mrs French.
- No, it wasn't me! It wasn't my voice!
- (court murmurs)
Talking and laughing they were.
But it was no business of mine,
so I went upstairs to fetch my pattern.
Now, let us be very exact as to the time.
You say that you
re-entered the house at 25 past 9?
Aye. The pattern was on a shelf in my
room next to my clock so I saw the time.
- And it was 25 past 9.
- Go on, please.
I went back to my niece. Och,
she was delighted with the pattern. Si...
Simply delighted. I stayed until 20 to 11,
then I said good night and I come home.
I went into the sitting room to see
if the mistress wanted anything
before she went to bed.
And there she was, dead.
And everything tossed hither and thither.
Did you really think
that a burglary had been committed?
My lord, I must protest!
I will not allow that question
to be answered, Mr Myers.
Miss McKenzie, were you aware
that Leonard Vole was a married man?
No, indeed.
And neither was the mistress.
- Janet!
- My lord, I must object.
What Mrs French knew or did not know is
Translation
Translate and read this script in other languages:
Select another language:
- - Select -
- 简体中文 (Chinese - Simplified)
- 繁體中文 (Chinese - Traditional)
- Español (Spanish)
- Esperanto (Esperanto)
- 日本語 (Japanese)
- Português (Portuguese)
- Deutsch (German)
- العربية (Arabic)
- Français (French)
- Русский (Russian)
- ಕನ್ನಡ (Kannada)
- 한국어 (Korean)
- עברית (Hebrew)
- Gaeilge (Irish)
- Українська (Ukrainian)
- اردو (Urdu)
- Magyar (Hungarian)
- मानक हिन्दी (Hindi)
- Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Italiano (Italian)
- தமிழ் (Tamil)
- Türkçe (Turkish)
- తెలుగు (Telugu)
- ภาษาไทย (Thai)
- Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
- Čeština (Czech)
- Polski (Polish)
- Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Românește (Romanian)
- Nederlands (Dutch)
- Ελληνικά (Greek)
- Latinum (Latin)
- Svenska (Swedish)
- Dansk (Danish)
- Suomi (Finnish)
- فارسی (Persian)
- ייִדיש (Yiddish)
- հայերեն (Armenian)
- Norsk (Norwegian)
- English (English)
Citation
Use the citation below to add this screenplay to your bibliography:
Style:MLAChicagoAPA
"Witness for the Prosecution" Scripts.com. STANDS4 LLC, 2024. Web. 19 Nov. 2024. <https://www.scripts.com/script/witness_for_the_prosecution_23585>.
Discuss this script with the community:
Report Comment
We're doing our best to make sure our content is useful, accurate and safe.
If by any chance you spot an inappropriate comment while navigating through our website please use this form to let us know, and we'll take care of it shortly.
Attachment
You need to be logged in to favorite.
Log In