Derrida
[ Derrida, In French ]
[ Woman On TV] Good evening.
Later on tonight's late show...
we look at the French
philosopherJacques Derrida...
founder of the post-structuralist
mode of analysis...
known as deconstruction...
and internationally acknowledged by many
as one of the most innovative...
and inspiring
of contemporary philosophers.
[ Siren Wailing ]
[ Chattering ]
My theory is that Americans exist to
the degree that they're being filmed...
or believe themselves
to be filmed.
- Yeah.
- This is their natural condition.
[ Mumbles ] You see
how Americanized I am now.
Careful.
[ Chuckles ]
She sees everything around me,
but she's totally blind.
That's the image of the philosopher
who falls in the well. You say?
- [ Woman ] Yes.
- While looking at the star.
- Watch it.
Watch--
Uh-uh-uh-uh-uh.
[ Derrida ]
all the time, day and night.
Wherever I am, for two weeks now
they have been constantly...
- Mm.
- tracking me.
[ Woman ]
Are you getting used to it?
- Sometimes I forget. I just forget.
- Yeah?
[ Derrida ] We should not neglect
the fact that some biographies--
written by people who have
authority in the academy--
finally invest
this authority in a book...
which, for centuries sometimes...
after the death of an author,
represent the truth.
Huh? The truth.
Someone...
interested
in biography writes...
Life and Works of Heidegger.
Well documented...
apparently consistent...
and it's the only one...
published by--
under the authority of a good press.
Okay? And then,
Heidegger's image--
Heidegger's life image--
is fixed and stabilized
for centuries.
That's why I would say
that sometimes...
the one who reads a text
by a philosopher...
for instance,
a tiny paragraph...
- and interprets it in a rigorous...
inventive and...
powerfully deciphering fashion...
is more of a real biographer...
than the one who knows
the whole story.
[ Derrida ]
This is the blue jacket I have.
That's nice.
But this doesn't fit with the--
This is black, this is not blue. Okay?
- And I usually can't--
- I know.
Can I-- We won't get your bottom half.
Can I see what it looks like?
Is that okay?
As you know, the traditional
philosophy excludes biography...
considers biography as
something external to philosophy.
You remember, uh...
Heidegger's statement...
about Aristotle.
Heidegger once was asked,
I think, uh...
''What is-- What was
the life of Aristotle?''
What could we answer to the question:
What was Aristotle's life?
Well, the answer
is very simple.
Aristotle was a philosopher.
The answer holds
in one sentence:
''He was born, he thought
and he died.''
And all the rest
is pure anecdote.
[ Woman ]
His mother's grave is profaned.
His parents never read
any ofhis books.
He cries out,
''Mommy, I'm scared, '"
every night until she lets him
sleep on a sofa near them.
One side ofhis face
is paralyzed for three weeks...
leaving his eye open
continuously, unblinking.
His father composes
his own death notice...
shortly before
he dies of cancer.
He's expelled from school
because he is Jewish.
He learns he was given
a secret name, Eli...
after theJewish prophet Elijah,
that isn't on his birth certificate.
He fails his first
entrance exam to the university.
at age 1 5...
about the theft of a diary
and blackmail for its return.
He pretends to learn Hebrew so as
to read it without understanding it.
He is arrested and thrown in prison
for 2 4 hours in Prague...
for transporting drugs,
which the authorities plant on him.
He receives a collect call from
someone who identifies himself as...
''Martini'"Heidegger.
He declines an offer
from Marguerite Duras...
to play a part
in one ofher films.
As an adolescent, he dreams of
becoming a professional soccer player.
He doesn't circumcise
his sons...
greatly upsetting
his mother and father.
He suffers from sleeplessness
and nervous collapse...
from the overuse of sleeping tablets
and amphetamines.
His older brother
lives only seven days...
dying just a year
before he is born.
Classical philosophers...
usually avoid
autobiography.
It is because they think
it's indecent.
That is, a philosopher should not speak
of himself as an empirical being.
And this impoliteness,
or this politeness...
is philosophy itself,
in principle.
So, if we want to break...
with this philosophical axiom,
classical philosophical axiom...
according to which a philosopher
should not present himself...
or...
[ Stammers ]
give in to autobiography...
then we have to be indecent
to some extent.
[ Woman ] We no longer consider
the biography of a philosopher...
as a set
of empirical accidents...
that leaves one with a name...
up to philosophical reading...
the only kind of reading held to be
philosophically legitimate.
Neither readings of
philosophical systems...
nor external
empirical readings...
have ever in themselves
questioned the dynamics...
of that borderline
between the work and the life...
between the system
and the subject of the system.
This borderline is neither
active nor passive.
It's neither outside
nor inside.
It is most especially not
a thin line...
an invisible
or indivisible trait...
that lies between the philosophy
on the one hand...
and the life of an author
on the other.
[ Chattering ]
- Hi. My name's Jenny.
- Hi.
Listening to you speak just elucidated
your texts just so much to me.
- [ Giggles ]
- But I just wanted to meet you.
- Thank you.
I-I read your novel, one of
your novels over the summer.
I just wanted to hear you speak
so I could understand it better.
I started reading about negative
theology... [ Garbled ]
and I was wondering
if there was any connection...
between, you said
a specific Christian discourse...
but I was wondering if there
was any connection between
that and say Hebrew cabala...
- uh, and something--
- Yeah, it never, it never finishes.
But it's not the same thing.
Cabala is full of...
[ Continues, Indistinct ]
- But it doesn't mean
there aren't a number of--
- Thank you.
[ Woman ] You're very well known
in the States for deconstruction.
Can you talk a little bit
about the origin of that idea?
[ In French ]
[ Woman ] The very condition
of a deconstruction...
may be at work in the work, within
the system to be deconstructed.
It may already be located there,
already at work.
Not at the center
but in an eccentric center...
in a corner whose eccentricity assures
the solid concentration of the system...
participating in the construction
of what it, at the same time...
threatens to deconstruct.
One might then be inclined
to reach this conclusion.
Deconstruction is not an operation
Translation
Translate and read this script in other languages:
Select another language:
- - Select -
- 简体中文 (Chinese - Simplified)
- 繁體中文 (Chinese - Traditional)
- Español (Spanish)
- Esperanto (Esperanto)
- 日本語 (Japanese)
- Português (Portuguese)
- Deutsch (German)
- العربية (Arabic)
- Français (French)
- Русский (Russian)
- ಕನ್ನಡ (Kannada)
- 한국어 (Korean)
- עברית (Hebrew)
- Gaeilge (Irish)
- Українська (Ukrainian)
- اردو (Urdu)
- Magyar (Hungarian)
- मानक हिन्दी (Hindi)
- Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Italiano (Italian)
- தமிழ் (Tamil)
- Türkçe (Turkish)
- తెలుగు (Telugu)
- ภาษาไทย (Thai)
- Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
- Čeština (Czech)
- Polski (Polish)
- Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Românește (Romanian)
- Nederlands (Dutch)
- Ελληνικά (Greek)
- Latinum (Latin)
- Svenska (Swedish)
- Dansk (Danish)
- Suomi (Finnish)
- فارسی (Persian)
- ייִדיש (Yiddish)
- հայերեն (Armenian)
- Norsk (Norwegian)
- English (English)
Citation
Use the citation below to add this screenplay to your bibliography:
Style:MLAChicagoAPA
"Derrida" Scripts.com. STANDS4 LLC, 2024. Web. 22 Dec. 2024. <https://www.scripts.com/script/derrida_6741>.
Discuss this script with the community:
Report Comment
We're doing our best to make sure our content is useful, accurate and safe.
If by any chance you spot an inappropriate comment while navigating through our website please use this form to let us know, and we'll take care of it shortly.
Attachment
You need to be logged in to favorite.
Log In