Free Radicals: A History of Experimental Film Page #5
My films are made like sculptures,
they are not made on an editing table
or with the help of the
projector because at that time -
it's not even my merit -
because I was too poor
to have a projector,
and too poor to have
an editing table.
I had just enough money
to film that minute.
In fact I had two
minutes of material,
one Arriflex reel of 60 meters
which is two minutes, that was all.
And I had one light
which I put on the wall
so I couldn't have even filmed the
faces, because there was not enough light.
It was only enough
to get silhouettes.
So an important factor in the making
of my films were my life circumstances.
So these are as much
sculptures as they are film,
but in addition, they
are their own score.
When you read the film like this,
and you know how fast you read,
and you can learn this much faster
than learning to read a musical score.
If you work on it for
two weeks you can do it.
Memorizing, you can memorize it.
And for example you
can measure the speed.
The way artworks are
handled now is very strange,
namely as a commodity
of business, you see?
It will change again, it will get
over, but today now this is horrible.
And it creates a completely
new genre of people
who do something which
they call art but it isn't,
it's commodities,
decoration, and so on.
So I wanted to ask you,
how did you guys meet?
It was December,
end of '63, December,
maybe it was the last day of the
year, in Knokke-le-Zoute Belgium,
in the experimental film festival
which was run by the great friend,
great guy, Jacques Ledoux.
-Yes, it was this guy.
So the screening of miscellaneous,
some so-so, mostly pretty bad movies
applauded and had great time.
And then this film comes up
and it says Arnulf Rainer,
and the audience is
silent. Everybody's silent.
Then some people begin
to make some noises.
were even some boos.
And then some left.
Reaction was to me so disgusting
that I left immediately, did
not want to see anything else,
and leave the theatre, and I
see this guy standing there,
sort of like he had been
beaten on the head with a board,
sort of, you know pretty quiet.
I said, that must be Peter Kubelka!
So I came and I said, boy that
was great! That was a masterpiece!
and we always are friends.
And we do different things
and we are still friends,
we are friends despite everything.
There is a question of
solidarity and recognition,
that somebody else is doing
that is not commercial, not,
though it's something
very, very, very different,
but like somebody who is doing...
you feel solidarity with somebody,
that, yeah we are in
the same area, you see.
And influence is something else.
So there is like friendship, more than
influencing, you see, which gives you,
helps you to do the
way you want to do,
because somebody else is doing
the way he or she is doing
with no compromise.
"No compromise" is how Stan
Brakhage made his life work.
Over five decades he filmed
or painted close to 400 films.
He too struggled to make a living
even though he is considered one of the
most important figures in 20th century art.
He lived in Colorado.
Here we see him filmed
and here we see him in New York
with Jonas, filmed by me in 2000.
Three years later I was invited by
French television to interview Brakhage,
sick with cancer, at
his new home in Canada.
It happened to be
his last interview.
He told me his films
were like poems,
and should be understood
and felt as poems,
an adventure in perception.
At least what my integrity was
that I did not fake being a poet
and for that reason I believe
that the muse who permits -
who is that part of human consciousness
that permits the creation of an art or not -
allowed me to do
something with film.
Huh! And you can say, what! For me?
Film for me? Thanks a lot!
Every time you turn around
it costs you a fortune,
it'll destroy your whole
life, you know, you can't...
Press the button but once and
you've spent fifty dollars, you know.
But anyway, that was the
gift that was given to me,
and so long as I remain true
to that and the other arts
(and I've always been very careful
therefore to do so, to be so),
I could be a filmmaker.
It is made with my
fingernails, with my spit.
"This is the spit of
the poet!", you know.
The spit of the filmmaker, as I
won't fancy myself as a poet, nope.
The spit of the filmmaker!
And it's made from
the nails themselves,
feeling, pressing,
making an impress
of whatever feelings there are
to them in space and shape and so.
So thus maybe a little film is
being born, maybe not, who knows.
But I'm trying, I'm trying.
I'm trying from this
sickbed to sing a song.
I miss Stan.
We had real serious shadow hunger,
and we were looking for
a movie to grab onto.
One time we walked into this theater
that was showing Green Mansions,
be happening with that movie.
And it ended up with us trying to find
just something to have an experience.
Like looking at the film - it was
a color film, a big color film -
so if somebody was sitting and had some
gap between their arm and their body,
you might want to look at
the film through the gap,
so it would have this
shape, or upside-down.
And we ended up with our heads against
the screen looking up at it like this,
and an usher came and very politely
told us that we would have to leave.
But it was out of desperation.
The film industry was even less
receptive than the galleries.
Finally the filmmakers got together
and took matters into their own hands.
Led by the Mekas brothers,
they set up their own distribution
cooperatives and networks and cinematheques,
and these are still active today.
Nobody wanted to
distribute our films.
So we had to create our
own distribution center.
Possible, not possible,
there was nobody who wanted to
distribute them to begin with.
How did everyone know everybody
else to get together at first?
I called them, my brother, myself,
we called them in January '62,
said it's time that we create our own
film cooperative distribution center.
And about 25 filmmakers,
or about 20 or so,
came and we all
said yes let's do it,
and we created our own
distribution center.
OK, you're visiting the New American
Cinema Group, the filmmakers' coop,
founded in 1961 by a group
of 22 New York artists.
The coop was founded as
part of the counterculture.
It wasn't just isolated
New York Film Coop.
It was part of a movement,
like Free Cinema in England,
or the French New Wave.
And the manifesto is that
it's a personal vision.
It's:
anyone can make a movie; youcan make a movie for fifty dollars.
So what they did is formed a network of
distribution, exhibition, publication.
With money generated
Translation
Translate and read this script in other languages:
Select another language:
- - Select -
- 简体中文 (Chinese - Simplified)
- 繁體中文 (Chinese - Traditional)
- Español (Spanish)
- Esperanto (Esperanto)
- 日本語 (Japanese)
- Português (Portuguese)
- Deutsch (German)
- العربية (Arabic)
- Français (French)
- Русский (Russian)
- ಕನ್ನಡ (Kannada)
- 한국어 (Korean)
- עברית (Hebrew)
- Gaeilge (Irish)
- Українська (Ukrainian)
- اردو (Urdu)
- Magyar (Hungarian)
- मानक हिन्दी (Hindi)
- Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Italiano (Italian)
- தமிழ் (Tamil)
- Türkçe (Turkish)
- తెలుగు (Telugu)
- ภาษาไทย (Thai)
- Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
- Čeština (Czech)
- Polski (Polish)
- Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
- Românește (Romanian)
- Nederlands (Dutch)
- Ελληνικά (Greek)
- Latinum (Latin)
- Svenska (Swedish)
- Dansk (Danish)
- Suomi (Finnish)
- فارسی (Persian)
- ייִדיש (Yiddish)
- հայերեն (Armenian)
- Norsk (Norwegian)
- English (English)
Citation
Use the citation below to add this screenplay to your bibliography:
Style:MLAChicagoAPA
"Free Radicals: A History of Experimental Film" Scripts.com. STANDS4 LLC, 2024. Web. 24 Nov. 2024. <https://www.scripts.com/script/free_radicals:_a_history_of_experimental_film_8556>.
Discuss this script with the community:
Report Comment
We're doing our best to make sure our content is useful, accurate and safe.
If by any chance you spot an inappropriate comment while navigating through our website please use this form to let us know, and we'll take care of it shortly.
Attachment
You need to be logged in to favorite.
Log In